No abstract

Introduction: The Calgary Family Medicine (FM) Residency Program implemented a competency-based curriculum in 2012 (Triple C). To meet the College of Family Physicians' accreditation standards, the Program also implemented a new assessment program. Field notes (FNs) were introduced to record feedback and to provide data for decisions around Resident competence and progress. Validation of inferences from data collected in field notes is sparse, particularly in relation to how the data can be extrapolated to competence and professional practice. This study investigates the quality and trustworthiness of FNs when their content is used to make decisions about a Resident's competence. Methods: Assessment data from over 3100 FNs, 99 inprogram progress decisions, and scores on the the SOOs and SAMPs components of the College of CFPC Certification Examination in FM were analysed for 16 randomly selected Residents who had successfully completed the Urban FM Residency Program in Calgary under the Triple C Curriculum. Six independent raters (FM community preceptors) were recruited to review copies of the same sets of FNs that were originally used by in-program preceptors to assess Resident progress. 2 independent blinded raters were randomly assigned to each set of FNs. Raters were asked to use FN data to decide on Resident progress, and indicate their level of confidence in their decisions. This was compared with Peer Review under the responsibility of Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. the actual in-program progress decision previously made for each Resident. Quality of FNs was assessed using a Formative Feedback Evaluation Tool (FFET), and were scored 1-5. Results: The quality of the FN data was found to be suboptimal (mean 2.27). The consistency of raters' progress decisions was high (89%). Correlation analyses indicated a significant weak positive relationship between quality of FNs and raters' confidence, r(196) = .201, p = .005; a significant moderate positive linear relationship between number of FNs and raters' confidence, r(196) = .30, p < .001; and a significant moderate positive linear relationship between total number of FNs received by a resident and the residents z-scores in the SAMPS component of the CFPC exam, r(14) = .55, p = .026 Conclusion: The results provide evidence supporting the validity of assessment decisions based on Field Note data. The quality and number as well as the quality of the FNs appears important in supporting the trustworthiness of summative progress decisions.

Actitud y habilidades del médico residente de pediatría en la enseñanza de los médicos internos de pregrado, experiencia en hospitales públicos y privados al noroeste de México

Background: Standardized Simulated Training (SST) has shown to improve both resident and surgeon skills. However, Simulation Centers with validated training programs are scarce and centralized. The current challenge is to provide the surgical community access to these programs. Aim: To describe the first Learning Center (LC), launched during the 90th Chilean Surgical Congress, and to assess its impact and attendees' perception on simulation in Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) in current surgery residency programs. Materials and Method: Cross-sectional study. LC characteristics are described. A Likert survey was applied to assess its impact and attendees' perception. Inclusion criteria: to have performed ≥ 1 training sessions. Exclusion criteria: incomplete surveys. Descriptive and non-parametric analytical statistics were applied. Results: The LC was composed of 10 training stations with different difficulty levels. Nine instructors monitored and gave attendees effective feedback. 84 attendees answered the survey adequately. 39% were women. The sample was composed of 41.6% General Surgery Residents, 35.7% Surgeons, 17.9% Medicine Clerks and 4.8% General Practitioners. 85% of participants agreed regarding both the positive impact of the LC as a continuous educational resource during the congress and SST usefulness in development of MIS skills. There were no significant differences according to sex or medical degree. Conclusion: The first LC was widely accepted amongst its participants, constituting a possible permanent resource in the Chilean Surgical Congress. SST in MIS seems to be an accepted resource and perceived as a necessity by the national surgical community.Introducción: El entrenamiento estandarizado mediante simulación ha demostrado mejorar habilidades de residentes y cirujanos. Sin embargo, los centros de simulación que imparten programas validados son escasos y centralizados. Favorecer el acceso de la comunidad quirúrgica a estos programas constituye el desafío actual. Objetivo: Describir el primer "Learning Center" (LC) realizado durante el 90º Congreso Chileno de Cirugía, evaluar su impacto y percepción de los asistentes sobre simulación en cirugía mínimamente invasiva (CMI) en los programas de formación actual. Materiales y Método: Estudio de corte transversal. Se describieron las características del LC. Se aplicó una encuesta tipo Likert para evaluar impacto y percepción de los asistentes. Criterios de inclusión: completar ≥ 1 sesión de entrenamiento, exclusión: encuesta incompleta. Se aplicó estadística descriptiva y analítica no paramétrica. Resultados: LC se compuso de 10 estaciones de entrenamiento con distintos niveles de dificultad. Un equipo de 9 instructores monitorizaron y entregaron feedback efectivo a los asistentes. 84 asistentes contestaron la encuesta completa, 39% mujeres. La muestra se conformó por 41,6% residentes de cirugía general, 35,7% cirujanos, 17,9% internos de medicina, y 4,8% médicos generales. 85% manifestó acuerdo con el impacto positivo del LC como recurso educacional...

No abstract