Philanthotoxin-433 (PhTX-433) is an active component of the venom from the Egyptian digger wasp, Philanthus triangulum. PhTX-433 inhibits several excitatory ligand-gated ion channels, and to improve selectivity two synthetic analogues, PhTX-343 and PhTX-12, were developed. Previous work showed a 22-fold selectivity of PhTX-12 over PhTX-343 for embryonic muscle-type nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in TE671 cells. We investigated their inhibition of different neuronal nAChR subunit combinations as well as of embryonic muscle receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Whole-cell currents in response to application of acetylcholine alone or co-applied with PhTX analogue were studied by using two-electrode voltage-clamp. α3β4 nAChRs were most sensitive to PhTX-343 (IC50 = 12 nM at −80 mV) with α4β4, α4β2, α3β2, α7 and α1β1γδ being 5, 26, 114, 422 and 992 times less sensitive. In contrast α1β1γδ was most sensitive to PhTX-12 along with α3β4 (IC50 values of 100 nM) with α4β4, α4β2, α3β2 and α7 being 3, 3, 26 and 49 times less sensitive. PhTX-343 inhibition was strongly voltage-dependent for all subunit combinations except α7, whereas this was not the case for PhTX-12 for which weak voltage dependence was observed. We conclude that PhTX-343 mainly acts as an open-channel blocker of nAChRs with strong subtype selectivity.
BackgroundLacerations account for a large number of ED visits. Is there a “golden period” beyond which lacerations should not be repaired primarily? What type of relationship exists between time of repair and wound infection rates? Is it linear or exponential? Currently, the influence of laceration age on the risk of infection in simple lacerations repaired is not clearly defined. We conducted this study to determine the influence of time of primary wound closure on the infection rate.MethodsThis is a prospective observational study of patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) with a laceration requiring closure from April 2009 to November 2010. The wound closure time was defined as the time interval from when the patient reported laceration occurred until the time of the start of the wound repair procedure. Univariate analysis was performed to determine the factors predictive of infection. A non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test was performed to compare the median differences of time of laceration repair. Chi-square (Fisher's exact) tests were performed to test for infection differences with regard to gender, race, location of laceration, mechanism of injury, co-morbidities, type of anesthesia and type of suture material used.ResultsOver the study period, 297 participants met the inclusion criteria and were followed. Of the included participants, 224 (75.4%) were male and 73 (24.6%) were female. Ten patients (3.4%) developed a wound infection. Of these infections, five occurred on hands, four on extremities (not hands) and one on the face. One of these patients was African American, seven were Hispanic and two were Caucasian (p = 0.0005). Median wound closure time in the infection group was 867 min and in the non-infection group 330 min (p = 0.03).ConclusionsWithout controlling various confounding factors, the median wound closure time for the lacerations in the wound infection group was statistically significantly longer than in the non-infection group.
Haemophilus influenzae can acquire heme from hemopexin for use as a source of both essential porphyrin and iron. In classical ligand-binding studies, we observed time-dependent, saturable, and displaceable binding of human 125 I-labelled hemopexin to intact cells of H. influenzae type b (Hib) strain 760705 grown in an iron-restricted medium. From these experiments, which demonstrate that hemopexin associates with a single class of binding site, the affinities (K d s) and receptor numbers were calculated for heme-hemopexin (K d , 205 nM; 3,200 receptors per cell) and apohemopexin (K d , 392 nM; 4,400 receptors per cell). Thus, Hib expresses a specific hemopexin receptor which shows some preference for the heme-protein complex. Affinity chromatography on hemopexin-Sepharose 4B of detergent-solubilized membranes from Hib strain 760705 results in the copurification of three proteins with molecular masses of 57, 38, and 29 kDa. Trypsinization of whole cells of Hib 760705 abolishes hemopexin binding and correlates with the disappearance of the 57-kDa hemopexinbinding protein and appearance of a 52-kDa species which does not bind either hemopexin in ligand blot assays or a monoclonal antibody (MAbT11-30) raised against the 57-kDa protein. From immunoblotting assays and NH 2-terminal amino acid sequence analysis, the 38-kDa protein isolated following hemopexin affinity chromatography was identified as the porin protein P2. These data, taken together with the receptor-binding studies which support a single class of hemopexin-binding site, suggest that P2 and the 29-kDa protein function as accessory proteins to the 57-kDa hemopexin-binding protein to facilitate the uptake of heme from receptorbound hemopexin. To determine whether hemopexin binding and the 57-kDa protein are conserved in Haemophilus strains, whole-cell dot blots and immunoblots of the outer membrane proteins prepared from strains belonging to each of 21 different Hib outer membrane protein subtypes, six nontypeable strains, and five Haemophilus parainfluenzae strains were probed with either hemopexin or MAbT11-30. Only the H. parainfluenzae strains which lack the 57-kDa protein do not bind hemopexin. Since H. influenzae has also been shown to produce a soluble 100-kDa hemopexin-binding protein, cell-free culture supernatants were also examined for the presence of this protein. Apart from Hib 760705 and H. parainfluenzae, the 100-kDa hemopexin-binding protein was detected in all the other Haemophilus strains. The abilities of Hib 760705 to both bind and acquire heme from hemopexin without expressing a 100-kDa soluble hemopexin-binding protein show that in strain 760705, this 100-kDa protein is not essential for the utilization of heme from hemopexin.
The harlequin ladybird, Harmonia axyridis (H. axyridis), possesses a strong chemical defence that has contributed to its invasive success. Ladybird beetle defensive chemicals, secreted in response to stress and also found on the coating of laid eggs, are rich in alkaloids that are thought to be responsible for this beetle's toxicity to other species. Recent studies have shown that alkaloids from several species of ladybird beetle can target nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) acting as receptor antagonists, hence we have explored the actions of alkaloids of the ladybird H. axyridis on both mammalian and insect nAChRs. Electrophysiological studies on native and functionally expressed recombinant nAChRs were used to establish whether an alkaloid extract from H. axyridis (HAE) targeted nAChRs and whether any selectivity exists for insect over mammalian receptors of this type. HAE was found to be an inhibitor of all nAChRs tested with the voltage-dependence of inhibition and the effect on ACh EC50 differing between nAChR subtypes. Our finding that an HAE fraction consisting almost entirely of harmonine had a strong inhibitory effect points to this alkaloid as a key component of nAChR inhibitory actions. Comparison of HAE inhibition between the mammalian and insect nAChRs investigated indicates some preference for the insect nAChR supporting the view that investigation of ladybird alkaloids shows promise as a method for identifying natural product leads for future insecticide development.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.