Steroid receptors comprise an evolutionarily conserved family of transcription factors. Although the qualitative aspects by which individual receptors regulate transcription are well understood, a quantitative perspective is less clear. This is primarily because receptor function is considerably more complex than that of classical regulatory factors such as phage or bacterial repressors. Here we discuss recent advances in placing receptor-specific transcriptional regulation on a more quantitative footing, specifically focusing on the role of macromolecular interaction energetics. We first highlight limitations and challenges associated with traditional approaches for assessing the role of energetics (more specifically, binding affinity) with functional outcomes such as transcriptional activation. We next demonstrate how rigorous in vitro measurements and straightforward interaction models quantitatively relate energetics to transcriptional activity within the cell, and follow by discussing why such an approach is unexpectedly effective in explaining complex functional behavior. Finally, we examine the implications of these findings for considering the unique gene regulatory properties of the individual receptors.

Genome packaging is strongly conserved in the complex double-stranded DNA viruses, including the herpesviruses and many bacteriophages. In these cases, viral DNA is packaged into a procapsid shell by a terminase enzyme. The packaging substrate is typically a concatemer composed of multiple genomes linked in a head-to-tail fashion, and terminase enzymes perform two essential functions: 1) excision of a unit length genome from the concatemer (genome maturation) and 2) translocation of the duplex into a procapsid (genome packaging). While the packaging motors have been described in some detail, the maturation complexes remain ill characterized. Here we describe the assembly, physical characteristics, and catalytic activity of the λ-genome maturation complex. The λ-terminase protomer is composed of one large catalytic subunit tightly associated with two DNA recognition subunits. The isolated protomer binds DNA weakly and does not discriminate between nonspecific DNA and duplexes that contain the packaging initiation sequence, cos. The Escherichia coli integration host factor protein (IHF) is required for efficient λ-development in vivo and a specific IHF recognition sequence is found within cos. We show that IHF and the terminase protomer cooperatively assemble at the cos site and that the small terminase subunit plays the dominant role in complex assembly. Analytical ultracentrifugation analysis reveals that the maturation complex is composed of four protomers and one IHF heterodimer bound at the cos site. Tetramer assembly activates the cos-cleavage nuclease activity of the enzyme, which matures the genome end in preparation for packaging. The stoichiometry and catalytic activity of the complex is reminiscent of the type IIE and IIF restriction endonucleases and the two systems may share mechanistic features. This study, to our knowledge, provides our first detailed glimpse into the structural and functional features of a viral genome maturation complex, an essential intermediate in the development of complex dsDNA viruses.

Steroid receptors comprise a homologous family of ligand-activated transcription factors. The members include androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor (ER), glucocorticoid receptor (GR), mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) and progesterone receptor (PR). Phylogenetic studies demonstrate that AR, GR, MR and PR are most closely related, falling into subgroup 3C. ER is more distantly related, falling into subgroup 3A. To determine the quantitative basis by which receptors generate their unique transcriptional responses, we are systematically dissecting the promoter-binding energetics of all receptors under a single “standard state” condition. Here we examine the self-assembly and promoter-binding energetics of full-length AR and a mutant associated with prostate cancer, T877A. We first demonstrate that both proteins exist only as monomers, showing no evidence of dimerization. Although this result contradicts the traditional understanding that steroid receptors dimerize in the absence of DNA, it is fully consistent with our previous work demonstrating that GR and two PR isoforms either do not dimerize or dimerize only weakly. Moreover, both AR proteins exhibit substantial cooperativity between binding sites, again as seen for GR and PR. In sharp contrast, the more distantly related ER-α dimerizes so strongly that energetics can only be measured indirectly, yet cooperativity is negligible. Thus homologous receptors partition their promoter-binding energetics quite differently. Moreover, since receptors most closely related by phylogeny partition their energetics similarly, such partitioning appears to be evolutionarily conserved. We speculate that such differences in energetics, coupled with different promoter architectures, serve as the basis for generating receptor-specific promoter occupancy and thus function.

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a member of the steroid receptor family of ligand-activated transcription factors. Recent live cell imaging studies have revealed that interactions of GR with chromatin are highly dynamic, with average receptor residence times of only seconds. These findings were surprising because early kinetic studies found that GR-DNA interactions in vitro were much slower, having calculated residence times of minutes to hours. However, these latter analyses were conducted at a time when it was possible to work with only either partially purified holoreceptor or its purified but isolated DNA binding domain. Noting these limitations, we reexamined GR-DNA dissociation kinetics using a highly purified holoreceptor shown to be amenable to rigorous study. We first observe that GR-DNA interactions in vitro are not slow as previously thought but converge with in vivo behavior, having residence times of only seconds to tens of seconds. This rapid exchange is seen at six individual response elements and the multisite MMTV promoter used in live cell imaging. Second, GR dissociation rates are identical for all response elements. Thus, previously observed differences in receptor affinity toward these sequences are not due to differences in off rate but in on rate. Finally, dissociation kinetics are biphasic in character. A minimal kinetic model consistent with the data is that in which DNA-bound GR interconverts between states on a second time scale, with dissociation occurring via a multistep process. We speculate that receptor interconversion in this time frame can be recognized by the coregulatory proteins that interact with GR, leading to unique transcriptional responses.

No abstract