The mechanisms which regulate cell turnover in the intestinal epithelium are incompletely understood. The present study was performed to characterize the role of autocrine IGF system components in intestine epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation comparing rapidly growing crypt cells (IEC-6) with differentiating enterocytes (CaCo-2). The autocrine release of IGF-I, IGF-II and IGFBP-1 through -3 was determined by specific RIAs and western ligand blotting. In addition, binding and growth-promoting activity of insulin, IGF-I and IGF-II was investigated. Enterocytic differentiation was assessed by measuring the brush-border enzymes alkaline phosphatase and sucrase. During IEC-6 growth, the autocrine release of IGF-I and -II increased, whereas IGFBP-2 levels decreased. Specific receptors for IGF-I and IGF-II but not insulin could be detected. IGF-I was 100-fold more potent than insulin to stimulate IEC-6 cell proliferation. In contrast, CaCo-2 cells revealed higher binding of insulin than IGF-I/-II and no release of IGF-I. At switch from CaCo-2 cell proliferation to differentiation a marked increase in the secretion of IGF-II (10-fold), IGFBP-1 (2.5-fold), IGFBP-2 (3-fold), and IGFBP-3 (6-fold) was measured. Our data indicate that IGF system components differentially modulate enterocytic cell proliferation and differentiation.
Glucagon-like peptide-1-(7---36) amide (GLP-1) is a potent incretin hormone secreted from distal gut. It stimulates basal and glucose-induced insulin secretion and proinsulin gene expression. The present study tested the hypothesis that GLP-1 may modulate insulin receptor binding. RINm5F rat insulinoma cells were incubated with GLP-1 (0.01-100 nM) for different periods (1 min-24 h). Insulin receptor binding was assessed by competitive ligand binding studies. In addition, we investigated the effect of GLP-1 on insulin receptor binding on monocytes isolated from type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients and healthy volunteers. In RINm5F cells, GLP-1 increased the capacity and affinity of insulin binding in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. The GLP-1 receptor agonist exendin-4 showed similar effects, whereas the receptor antagonist exendin-(9---39) amide inhibited the GLP-1-induced increase in insulin receptor binding. The GLP-1 effect was potentiated by the adenylyl cyclase activator forskolin and the stable cAMP analog Sp-5, 6-dichloro-1-beta-D-ribofuranosyl-benzimidazole-3', 5'-monophosphorothioate but was antagonized by the intracellular Ca(2+) chelator 1,2-bis(0-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid-AM. Glucagon, gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP), and GIP-(1---30) did not affect insulin binding. In isolated monocytes, 24 h incubation with 100 nM GLP-1 significantly (P<0.05) increased the diminished number of high-capacity/low-affinity insulin binding sites per cell in type 1 diabetics (9,000+/-3,200 vs. 18,500+/-3,600) and in type 2 diabetics (15,700+/-2,100 vs. 28,900+/-1,800) compared with nondiabetic control subjects (25,100+/-2,700 vs. 26,200+/-4,200). Based on our previous experiments in IEC-6 cells and IM-9 lymphoblasts indicating that the low-affinity/high-capacity insulin binding sites may be more specific for proinsulin (Jehle, PM, Fussgaenger RD, Angelus NK, Jungwirth RJ, Saile B, and Lutz MP. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 276: E262-E268, 1999 and Jehle, PM, Lutz MP, and Fussgaenger RD. Diabetologia 39: 421-432, 1996), we further investigated the effect of GLP-1 on proinsulin binding in RINm5F cells and monocytes. In both cell types, GLP-1 induced a significant increase in proinsulin binding. We conclude that, in RINm5F cells and in isolated human monocytes, GLP-1 specifically increases the number of high-capacity insulin binding sites that may be functional proinsulin receptors.
Proinsulin and insulin binding in IM-9 lymphoblasts show curvilinear Scatchard plots, which may be explained by two binding sites, negative cooperativity of receptors, or both. Using flow-cytometric analysis of insulin binding, we were able to distinguish and separate two different IM-9 cell fractions. In both fractions, Scatchard plots for specific binding of insulin and proinsulin were linear, suggesting the presence of two distinct populations of receptors. Type 1 cells showed low capacity but high affinity of insulin binding (16,300 +/- 3,000 sites/cell; Kd 0.4 +/- 0.1 nmol/l). Proinsulin and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) were significantly less potent in competition. MA-20, a specific antibody against human insulin receptors, inhibited insulin binding by 80%, while the specific antibody against human IGF-1 receptors, alpha IR-3, had no effect. Pretreatment with insulin decreased insulin binding by 90%. 125I-insulin displayed stepwise dissociation with the rate markedly enhanced by cold insulin. Type 2 cells exhibited significantly different binding characteristics with higher capacity but lower affinity of 125I-insulin binding (430,000 +/- 25,000 sites/cell, p < 0.001 vs type 1; Kd 2 +/- 0.4 nmol/l, p < 0.02 vs type 1). Proinsulin competed with similar potency for insulin binding, while IGF-1 was still less potent. 125I-proinsulin showed a significantly higher binding affinity than 125I-insulin (Kd 0.5 +/- 0.3 nmol/l, p < 0.05) with 50,000 +/- 10,000 binding sites/cell. C-peptide was able to compete for 125I-proinsulin, but not for 125I-insulin binding. MA-20 did not influence 125I-proinsulin binding, but inhibited 125I-insulin binding by 50%, whereas alpha IR-3 increased proinsulin binding 1.5-fold with no effect on insulin binding. Preincubation with insulin decreased insulin binding by 50% and proinsulin binding by 10%. The dissociation of 125I-proinsulin showed linear first-order kinetics and was not significantly accelerated by cold proinsulin. Furthermore, the tyrosine phosphorylation of a 65 kDa protein was stimulated to a significantly greater extent by proinsulin than by insulin, indicating activation of different signalling cascades. DNA analysis revealed that type 1 cells were predominantly in the G1 phase, whereas type 2 cells were in the S and G2 + M phases of the cell cycle. We conclude, that IM-9 lymphoblasts were separated by flow-cytometry into one fraction with typical insulin receptors and a second fraction with high affinity binding sites for proinsulin. High affinity proinsulin binding sites were distinguished from typical insulin receptors by: 1) higher affinity for proinsulin than insulin, 2) inhibition of proinsulin binding by C-peptide but not by the insulin receptor antibody MA-20, 3) non-co-operative first order dissociation kinetics of proinsulin binding, 4) resistance to down-regulation by insulin, and 5) differences in signal transduction.
The mechanisms that regulate cell turnover in the intestinal epithelium are incompletely understood. Here we tested the hypothesis that proinsulin, present in serum and pancreatic juice in picomolar concentrations, stimulates growth of the rat small intestinal crypt-like cell line IEC-6 under serum-free conditions. Proinsulin binding was assessed by competitive ligand binding studies. Proinsulin and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) stimulated cell proliferation up to threefold above controls, with half-maximal action already in the picomolar range and with additive effects. In early confluent cell monolayers, proinsulin bound with higher affinity (IC50 1.3 ± 0.05 nM) and capacity (87,200 ± 2,500 receptors/cell) than IGF-I (4.0 ± 0.6; 23,700 ± 2,200, P < 0.05). C-peptide competed with 10-fold lower affinity for binding of125I-proinsulin but not for125I-IGF-I or125I-insulin, suggesting a specific binding epitope of the proinsulin molecule within or close to the C-peptide region. In contrast, insulin showed ∼100-fold lower binding affinity and growth-promoting potency than proinsulin or IGF-I. We conclude that proinsulin stimulates growth of small intestinal crypt cells through specific binding and may play a physiological role in the regulation of intestinal epithelial cell proliferation.
The aim of this study was to prove the feasibility of continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring in humans using the comparative microdialysis technique (CMT). The performance of the CMT was determined by comparing tissue glucose values with venous or capillary blood glucose values in healthy volunteers and type 1 diabetic subjects. The CMT is a microdialysis-based system for continuous online glucose monitoring in humans. This technique does not require calibration by the patient. Physiological saline with glucose (5.5 mM) is pumped in a stop-flow mode through a microdialysis probe inserted into the abdominal s.c. tissue. Tissue glucose concentration is calculated by comparing the dialysate and perfusate glucose concentrations. The time delay due to the measurement process is 9 min. We tested the CMT on six healthy volunteers and six type 1 diabetic patients for 24 h in our clinical setting. Comparisons were made to HemoCue analyzer (Angelholm, Sweden) capillary blood glucose measurements (healthy volunteers) and to venous blood glucose concentration determined with a Hitachi analyzer (diabetic patients). The mean absolute relative error of the CMT glucose values from the blood glucose values was 17.8+/-15.5% (n = 167) for the healthy volunteers and 11.0+/-10.8% (n = 425) for the diabetic patients. The mean difference was 0.42+/-1.06 mM (healthy volunteers) and -0.17+/-1.22 mM (diabetic patients). Error grid analysis for the values obtained in diabetic patients demonstrated that 99% of CMT glucose values were within clinically acceptable regions (regions A and B of the Clarke Error Grid). The study results show that the CMT is an accurate technique for continuous online glucose monitoring.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.