Commonly used techniques for trace-element analysis in human biological material are flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS), graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS), inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Elements that form volatile hydrides, first of all mercury, are analysed by hydride generation techniques. In the absorption techniques the samples are vaporized into free, neutral atoms and illuminated by a light source that emits the atomic spectrum of the element under analysis. The absorbance gives a quantitative measure of the concentration of the element. ICP-AES and ICP-MS are multi-element techniques. In ICP-AES the atoms of the sample are excited by, for example, argon plasma at very high temperatures. The emitted light is directed to a detector, and the optical signals are processed to values for the concentrations of the elements. In ICP-MS a mass spectrometer separates and detects ions produced by the ICP, according to their mass-to-charge ratio. Dilution of biological fluids is commonly needed to reduce the effect of the matrix. Digestion using acids and microwave energy in closed vessels at elevated pressure is often used. Matrix and spectral interferences may cause problems. Precautions should be taken against trace-element contamination during collection, storage and processing of samples. For clinical problems requiring the analysis of only one or a few elements, the use of FAAS may be sufficient, unless the higher sensitivity of GFAAS is required. For screening of multiple elements, however, the ICP techniques are preferable.

The in vitro uptake of various ions in scaled root surfaces from TiF₄ and acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) solutions, both with 1.1 M F and pH 1.0, was compared with that from a NaF solution, 0.5 M F, pH 7.1, using electron microprobe analysis, microradiography and polarized light microscopy. The mean F concentration (1.7%) and the mean depth (17 μm) of zones showing F increase following treatment with TiF₄ solution were much greater than in the NaF group. A fine layer of Ti-containing material covered the surface of the specimens. The APF solution caused even greater depositions of F, but a marked subsurface demineralization. Thus, TiF₄ and APF solutions with the same F molarity and pH showed different effect on the root surfaces. The results indicate that the use of TiF₄ in the topical application of fluoride may have several advantages. Further in vitro studies are warranted.

The chelating agent 2,3 dimercaptopropane-1-sulfonate (DMPS) has been used in a mercury mobilization test for diagnoses in illnesses allegedly associated with the presence of amalgam restorations. DMPS is an accepted antidote to heavy metal poisoning. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of DMPS in patients with symptoms self-related to their amalgam fillings. The subjects consisted of four groups: 19 healthy controls without amalgam experience; 21 healthy controls with amalgam fillings; 20 patients who claimed symptoms of "mercury poisoning" from dental amalgam; and 20 patients who had amalgam fillings removed because of such symptoms. DMPS (2 mg/kg body weight) was injected intravenously, and urine was collected prior to the injection, 30 and 120 min after the injection, and throughout the next 22 hrs. The samples were analyzed for total mercury by cold vapor atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The total median amounts of mercury excreted over 24 hrs for those with complaints allegedly associated with amalgam and for the healthy controls with amalgam fillings were similar. Persons with amalgam fillings excreted about three times more mercury than those without. The controls, who had never had amalgam fillings, and the subjects who had had their fillings removed excreted median amounts of 8.5 microg and 7.2 microg mercury, respectively. The present DMPS challenge test did not differentiate between patients with or those without complaints self-related to their amalgam fillings but did confirm the higher mercury values in patients with dental amalgam.

The amount of mercury released into saliva from dental amalgam fillings is currently being debated. Mercury enters saliva as vapor, ions and particles of amalgam. The aim of the present study was to determine mercury and silver concentrations in saliva of persons with amalgam fillings. Moreover, it was the aim to investigate whether amalgam particles were present in samples of stimulated saliva in control subjects. In that case, we also wanted to determine the influence of these particles on the mercury concentrations found. Fifty-three patients with a wide range of complaints self-related to their amalgam fillings were examined by the Dental Biomaterials Adverse Reaction Unit of Norway. Among other tests, stimulated saliva was collected from each patient and analyzed for mercury and silver. Mercury and silver correlated with the amount of amalgam present. There was a strong correlation between mercury and silver concentrations. Amalgam particles were found by energy dispersive X-ray analysis. It appears that a considerable part of the mercury and silver were present as amalgam particles. The present study shows that amalgam particles in saliva have to be controlled for when analyzing mercury in saliva from subjects with amalgam fillings.

In a previous in vitro study, a considerable fluoride uptake was found in scaled root surfaces following treatment with a TiF₄ solution (1.1 M F, pH 1.0). In spite of the low pH of the solution, no demineralization could be detected in the root tissue. This led to speculation that certain cations, known to act as complexers, might inhibit such demineralization. In the present experiment a SnF₂ solution (1.6 MF, pH 1,0) resulted in an even greater deposition of F in scaled root surfaces than the TiF₄ solution, but unlike the TiF₄ solution caused a marked subsurface demineralization. A hypothesis to explain this difference in interaction with the root tissue is offered.