Interval aerobic training programs (IATP) improve cardiorespiratory and endurance parameters. They are, however, unsuitable to seniors as frequently associated with occurrence of exhaustion and muscle pain. The purpose of this study was to measure the benefits of an IATP designed with recovery bouts (IATP-R) in terms of cardiorespiratory and endurance parameters and its acceptability among seniors (≥70 years). Sedentary healthy volunteers were randomly assigned either to IATP-R or sedentary lifestyle. All participants performed an incremental cycle exercise and 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) at baseline and 9.5 weeks later. The first ventilatory threshold (VT ); maximal tolerated power (MTP); peak of oxygen uptake (VO ); maximal heart rate (HR ); and distance walked at 6-MWT were thus measured. IATP-R consisted of 19 sessions of 30-minute (6 × 4-min at VT + 1-minute at 40% of VT ) cycling exercise over 9.5 weeks. With an adherence rate of 94.7% without any significant adverse events, 9.5 weeks of IATP-R, compared to controls, enhanced endurance (VT : +18.3 vs -4.6%; HR at baseline VT : -5.9 vs +0.2%) and cardiorespiratory parameters (VO : +14.1 vs -2.7%; HR : +1.6 vs -1.7%; MTP: +19.2 vs -2.3%). The walk distance at the 6-MWT was also significantly lengthened (+11.6 vs. -3.1%). While these findings resulted from an interim analysis planned when 30 volunteers were enrolled in both groups, IATP-R appeared as effective, safe, and applicable among sedentary healthy seniors. These characteristics are decisive for exercise training prescription and adherence.
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Purpose The purpose of this study was twofold: (i) determine if well-trained athletes can achieve similar peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak) in downhill running (DR) versus level running (LR) or uphill running (UR) and (ii) investigate if lower limb extensor muscle strength is related to the velocity at V˙O2peak (vV˙O2peak) in DR, LR, and UR. Methods Eight athletes (V˙O2max = 68 ± 2 mL·min−1·kg−1) completed maximal incremental tests in LR, DR (−15% slope), and UR (+15% slope) on a treadmill (+1, +1.5, and +0.5 km·h−1 every 2 min, respectively) while cardiorespiratory responses and spatiotemporal running parameters were continuously measured. They were also tested for maximal voluntary isometric strength of hip and knee extensors and plantar flexors. Results Oxygen uptake at maximal effort was approximately 16% to 18% lower in DR versus LR and UR (~57 ± 2 mL·min−1·kg−1, 68 ± 2 mL·min−1·kg−1, and 70 ± 3 mL·min−1·kg−1, respectively) despite much greater vV˙O2peak (22.7 ± 0.6 km·h−1 vs 18.7 ± 0.5 km·h−1 and 9.3 ± 0.3 km·h−1, respectively). At vV˙O2peak, longer stride length and shorter contact time occurred in DR versus LR and UR (+12%, +119%, −38%, and −61%, respectively). Contrary to knee extensor and plantar flexor, hip extensor isometric strength correlated to vV˙O2peak in DR, LR, and UR (r = −0.86 to −0.96, P < 0.05). At similar V˙O2, higher heart rate and ventilation emerged in DR versus LR and UR, associated with a more superficial ventilation pattern. Conclusions This study demonstrates that well-trained endurance athletes, accustomed to DR, achieved lower V˙O2peak despite higher vV˙O2peak during DR versus LR or UR maximal incremental tests. The specific heart rate and ventilation responses in DR might originate from altered running gait and increased lower-limb musculotendinous mechanical loading, furthering our understanding of the particular physiology of DR, ultimately contributing to optimize trail race running performance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.