Cryptochrome flavoproteins, which share sequence homology with light-dependent DNA repair photolyases, function as photoreceptors in plants and circadian clock components in animals. Here, we coupled sequencing of an Arabidopsis cryptochrome gene with phylogenetic, structural, and functional analyses to identify a new cryptochrome class (cryptochrome DASH) in bacteria and plants, suggesting that cryptochromes evolved before the divergence of eukaryotes and prokaryotes. The cryptochrome crystallographic structure, reported here for Synechocystis cryptochrome DASH, reveals commonalities with photolyases in DNA binding and redox-dependent function, despite distinct active-site and interaction surface features. Whole genome transcriptional profiling together with experimental confirmation of DNA binding indicated that Synechocystis cryptochrome DASH functions as a transcriptional repressor.

To understand how proteins translate the energy of sunlight into defined conformational changes, we have measured the photocycle reactions of photoactive yellow protein (PYP) using time-resolved step scan Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Global fit analysis yielded the same apparent time constants for the reactions of the chromophore, the protonation changes of protein side chains and the protein backbone motions, indicating that the light cycle reactions are synchronized. Changes in absorbance indicate that there are at least four intermediates (I1, I1', I2, I2'). In the intermediate I1, the dark-state hydrogen bond from Glu 46 to the aromatic ring of the p-hydroxycinnamoyl chromophore is preserved, implying that the chromophore undergoes trans to cis isomerization by flipping, not the aromatic ring, but the thioester linkage with the protein. This excludes an I1 structural model proposed on the basis of time resolved Laue crystallography, but does agree with the cryotrapped structure of an I1 precursor.

Using 1‐, 2‐, 3‐ and 4‐13C site‐specifically labelled ubiquinone‐10, reconstituted at the QA site of Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 reaction centres, the infra‐red bands dominated by the 1‐ and 4‐C = O vibration of QA are assigned in the QA(‐)‐QA difference spectra. The mode dominated by the 4‐C = O vibration is drastically downshifted in the reaction centres as compared with its absorption frequency in free ubiquinone‐10. In contrast, the mode dominated by the 1‐C = O vibration absorbs at similar frequencies in the free and the bound forms. The frequency shift of the 4‐C = O vibration is due to a large decrease in bond order and indicates a strong interaction with the protein microenvironment in the ground state. In the charge‐separated state the mode dominated by the semiquinone 4‐C = O vibration is characteristic of strong hydrogen bonding to the microenvironment, whereas the mode dominated by the 1‐C = O vibration indicates a weaker interaction. The asymmetric binding of the 1‐ and 4‐C = O groups to the protein might contribute to the factors governing different redox reactions of ubiquinone‐10 at the QA site as compared with its reactions at the QB site.

To understand in atomic detail how a chromophore and a protein interact to sense light and send a biological signal, we are characterizing photoactive yellow protein (PYP), a water-soluble, 14 kDa blue-light receptor which undergoes a photocycle upon illumination. The active site residues glutamic acid 46, arginine 52, tyrosine 42, and threonine 50 form a hydrogen bond network with the anionic p-hydroxycinnamoyl cysteine 69 chromophore in the PYP ground state, suggesting an essential role for these residues for the maintenance of the chromophore's negative charge, the photocycle kinetics, the signaling mechanism, and the protein stability. Here, we describe the role of T50 and Y42 by use of site-specific mutants. T50 and Y42 are involved in fine-tuning the chromophore's absorption maximum. The high-resolution X-ray structures show that the hydrogen-bonding interactions between the protein and the chromophore are weakened in the mutants, leading to increased electron density on the chromophore's aromatic ring and consequently to a red shift of its absorption maximum from 446 nm to 457 and 458 nm in the mutants T50V and Y42F, respectively. Both mutants have slightly perturbed photocycle kinetics and, similar to the R52A mutant, are bleached more rapidly and recover more slowly than the wild type. The effect of pH on the kinetics is similar to wild-type PYP, suggesting that T50 and Y42 are not directly involved in any protonation or deprotonation events that control the speed of the light cycle. The unfolding energies, 26.8 and 25.1 kJ/mol for T50V and Y42F, respectively, are decreased when compared to that of the wild type (29.7 kJ/mol). In the mutant Y42F, the reduced protein stability gives rise to a second PYP population with an altered chromophore conformation as shown by UV/visible and FT Raman spectroscopy. The second chromophore conformation gives rise to a shoulder at 391 nm in the UV/visible absorption spectrum and indicates that the hydrogen bond between Y42 and the chromophore is crucial for the stabilization of the native chromophore and protein conformation. The two conformations in the Y42F mutant can be interconverted by chaotropic and kosmotropic agents, respectively, according to the Hofmeister series. The FT Raman spectra and the acid titration curves suggest that the 391 nm form of the chromophore is not fully protonated. The fluorescence quantum yield of the mutant Y42F is 1.8% and is increased by an order of magnitude when compared to the wild type.