Introduction
Methicillin-susceptibleStaphylococcus
aureus(MSSA) bacteraemia is a frequent condition, with
high mortality rates. There is a growing interest in identifying new
therapeutic regimens able to reduce therapeutic failure and mortality
observed with the standard of care of beta-lactam monotherapy. In vitro
and small-scale studies have found synergy between cloxacillin and
fosfomycin againstS. aureus. Our aim is to
test the hypothesis that cloxacillin plus fosfomycin achieves higher
treatment success than cloxacillin alone in patients with MSSA
bacteraemia.
Methods
We will perform a superiority, randomised, open-label, phase IV–III,
two-armed parallel group (1:1) clinical trial at 20 Spanish tertiary
hospitals. Adults (≥18 years) with isolation of MSSA from at least one
blood culture ≤72 hours before inclusion with evidence of infection,
will be randomly allocated to receive either cloxacillin 2 g/4-hour
intravenous plus fosfomycin 3 g/6-hour intravenous or cloxacillin
2 g/4-hour intravenous alone for 7 days. After the first week,
sequential treatment and total duration of antibiotic therapy will be
determined according to clinical criteria by the attending
physician.
Primary endpoints: (1) Treatment success at day 7, a composite
endpoint comprising all the following criteria: patient alive, stable or
with improved quick-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, afebrile
and with negative blood cultures for MSSA at day 7. (2) Treatment
success at test of cure (TOC) visit: patient alive and no isolation of
MSSA in blood culture or at another sterile site from day 8 until TOC
(12 weeks after randomisation).
We assume a rate of treatment success of 74% in the cloxacillin
group. Accepting alpha risk of 0.05 and beta risk of 0.2 in a two-sided
test, 183 subjects will be required in each of the control and
experimental groups to obtain statistically significant difference of
12% (considered clinically significant).
Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of
Bellvitge University Hospital (AC069/18) and from the Spanish Medicines
and Healthcare Product Regulatory Agency (AEMPS, AC069/18), and is valid
for all participating centres under existing Spanish legislation. The
results will be presented at international meetings and will be made
available to patients and funders.
Trial registration number
The protocol has been approved by AEMPS with the Trial Registration
Number EudraCT 2018-001207-37. ClinicalTrials.gov
Identifier:NCT03959345; Pre-results.
Introduction:Streptococcus suis (S. suis) is a human zoonotic pathogen of occupational origin, with infection acquired through contact with live pigs or pig meat. Pig farming is one of Catalonia's biggest industries and as a result this region of Spain has one of the highest density pig populations per km2. The aim of our study was to describe the infections caused by S. suis occurring in that area over a 9-year period.Materials and Methods: A retrospective, multi-center study was carried out by searching records from 15 hospitals in Catalonia for the period between 2010 and 2019.Results: Over the study period altogether nine cases of S. suis infection were identified in five hospitals, with five of these cases occurring in the 2018–2019 period. The mean age of patients was 48 ± 8.9 years and all of them were males. Five patients (55.6%) worked in pig farms. The most frequent manifestation of infection was meningitis (5 cases; 55.6%) followed by septic arthritis (3 cases; 33.3%). None of the patients died at 30 days; nonetheless, 4 developed hearing loss as a long-term complication.Conclusion: The most commonly identified S. suis infection was meningitis. Over 50% of the episodes occurred in the last 2 years and have affected pig farm workers. Further surveillance is needed in order to know its prevalence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.