Vehicle analysis models of any kind have their basis in some type of physical representation of the design domain. Rather than describing three-dimensional continua of a collection of components as is done in detail-level CAD models, an architecture-level abstraction describes fundamental function and arrangement, while capturing just enough physical detail to be used as the basis for a meaningful design space representation and eventually, analyses that permit architecture assessment. The design information captured by the abstractions is available at the very earliest stages of the vehicle development process, so the model itself can function as a “design space for ideas”. In this paper we describe vehicle architecture abstractions appropriate for integrated model extractions suitable for geometric, inertial, rigid body, acceleration, braking, fuel efficiency, structural, and NVH assessments. Additionally, we discuss the requisite level of information required for each analysis type.

Due to a lack of suitable analysis tools, automotive engineers are often forced to forego quantitative optimization early in the development process, when fundamental decisions establishing vehicle architecture are made. This lack of tools arises because traditional analysis models require detailed geometric descriptions of components and assembly joints in order to yield accurate results, but this information is simply not available early in the development cycle. Optimization taking place later in the cycle usually occurs at the detail design level, and tends to result in expedient solutions to performance problems that might have been more effectively addressed at the architecture level. Alternatively, late-cycle architecture changes may be imposed, but such modifications are equivalent to a huge optimization cycle covering almost the entire design process, and require discarding the detail design work used originally as the basis of the NVH model. Optimizing at the architecture level can both shorten and improve the results of a vehicle development process. In this paper we describe the requirements and implementation of a user interface for a software package supporting vehicle architecture conceptual design and analysis.

The purpose of the article is to determine the genre-style and performance features of the collection «Plays for Saxophone» by O. Melnyk and F. Mykytyuk and their importance in the educational process of young musicians.  The methodology of the research is based on the use of methods: textual and source – in the study of musicological sources on the selected topic; stylistic and intonation analysis – to determine the genre-style and performance features of the analyzed sketches. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the actualization of the notographic material, analyzed for the first time and outlining the feasibility of its use in educational institutions of art in Ukraine.  Conclusions.  The collection «Plays for Saxophone» by O. Melnyk and F. Mykytyuk is aimed at mastering young musicians of various genres of miniatures, therefore, aimed at developing their skills in performing various technical, dynamic and articulatory techniques. The analyzed edition has enriched the pedagogical repertoire of saxophonists and is used in the educational process of young performers.

Vehicle analysis models of every type have their basis in some type of physical representation of the design domain. Rather than describing three-dimensional continua of a collection of components as is done in detail-level CAD models, an architecture-level abstraction describes fundamental function and arrangement, while capturing just enough physical detail to be used as the basis for a meaningful representation of the design, and eventually, analyses that permit architecture assessment. The design information captured by the abstractions is available at the very earliest stages of the vehicle developing process, so the model itself can function as a "design space for ideas". In this paper we describe a generalized process for analysis model extraction from vehicle architecture abstractions, and then apply that process to the specific case of rigid body response models. We also discuss implementation of a rigid body analysis engine that forms part of the analysis suite of a software package supporting all aspects of vehicle architecture design. UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release. Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

No abstract