Dyspepsia is defined by any disorder of digestion in the gastrointestinal tract or gastric sensitivity, and is divided into two groups: secondary dyspepsia, which are specific lesions such as peptic ulcer, esophagitis, gastric cancer, and cholelithiasis that result from different diseases, and functional dyspepsia. For the diagnosis of functional dyspepsia, the Rome IV criteria should be adopted. For the diagnosis of functional dyspepsia, the patient must have one or more of the following symptoms: a nagging sensation of postprandial fullness, early satiety, epigastric burning, and no evidence of structural disease that would explain the symptoms. There are signs and symptoms that the physician must be alert to in order to investigate more serious diseases that require earlier therapeutic measures, such as neoplasms. These signs are characterized as "alarm signals" and among them are, for example: unintentional weight loss, dysphagia, odynophagia, persistent vomiting, hematemesis, family history of cancer of the gastrointestinal tract. The use of upper endoscopy is one of the most common methods for investigating dyspepsia, but it should not be requested for all patients indiscriminately. Given this, the objective of this research was to identify the alarm signs and analyze the main criteria used for the request of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in dyspeptic patients in order to reduce the impacts before the investigation and clinical management performed. For this, a systematic review of the literature was performed from a search in the Scielo database, using the descriptors "upper digestive endoscopy" and "dyspepsia", finding a total of 15 studies published in the period 2010 to 2020 and after reading the title and abstract, 14 articles were selected for presenting greater relevance and affinity with the subject under study. The inclusion criteria used were productions in the public domain that dealt with the proposed theme, works written in several languages and productions available in full, thus excluding the Edimundo Da Silva Quadros Junior et al.
O hipotireoidismo é definido como uma hipofunção da tireoide, tendo como principal causa, atualmente, as doenças autoimunes da glândula, caracterizadas por uma resposta imune local e redução da produção dos hormônios tireoidianos. A doença celíaca (DC), por sua vez, é definida como uma enteropatia autoimune permanente desencadeada pelo glúten, na qual há produção de diversos autoanticorpos. Uma parcela significativa de pacientes com hipotireoidismo requer doses maiores de T4 para alcançar os níveis ideais de TSH, incluindo os pacientes celíacos. Ademais, dentre as causas que diversificam a apresentação clínica da DC destaca-se o hipotireoidismo. Com o objetivo de estabelecer associações entre ambas as doenças foi realizada uma revisão embasada nos bancos de dados MEDLINE e SciELO. Os resultados mostram que as doenças autoimunes comumente se associam e representam fatores de risco entre si. Porém, o rastreamento indiscriminado dessas ainda é inviável e pouco benéfico. Por isso, saber quando suspeitar clinicamente e como investigar o hipotireoidismo e/ou a DC é de extrema importância.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.