The violence against women is increasing in number. This article discusses the factors underlying the occurrence and other form of violence against women that occurred in the Police Banyumas region. Sociological juridical approach used in this research. Specification of research is descriptive. The data used are primary and secondary data. The dominant factors that cause criminal violence to women are dominated by economic factors about 70%, cultural factors about 15%, affair factors about 10 %, and lack of communication between family factors about 5 %. The types of criminal violence to women based on data from LSM Lentera Perempuan WCC Banyumas, Victims, and Poice Banyumas region most of the type criminal violence to women is domestic violence, as physic, psychological, sexual violence, and negligence of household. The problem solving is with the litigation process or non litigation process. The litigation process with criminal law process and the non litigation process with mediation. Keywords: Domestic violence, form of violence, cause of violence

The abuse of narcotics is now a common enemy that encourages the formation of various related regulations. However, on the implementation level, there are problems in deciding cases of narcotics abuse, especially related to the application of Article 127 of Law no. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics. This study aims to identify problems in deciding cases of narcotics abuse in order to identify the solution. The method used in this research is normative juridical. The results showed that there are two main issues that arise. First, the tendency of the Prosecutor to indict the abuser by Article 111 or 112 of Law no. 35 of 2009. Although there is currently a SEMA no. 3 of 2015, in which judges may violate the specific minimum criminal threats, the application of SEMA still creates a polemic. Secondly, the perspectives of prosecutors and judges who tend to convict drug abuse prisoners rather than ordered to rehabilitate them.

Contempt of Court historically comes from Common Law in England where as it represents the king as the God Representative in the world to punish whoever against its commands and prohibitions.  The term of Contempt means indignity so contempt of court means an action insulting the board of court.  The researcher is interested in the Contempt of Court research in Indonesia since there are a lot cases which could be qualified as Contempt of Court but the regulation has not been clear enough. The data needed are secondary data and supported by the primary data got from interviews with the experts of criminal law.  The result of the research shows that the basic idea of the contempt of court  managed  in the criminal code is closely related with and afford to promote the high authority and privilege. Contempt of Court in Indonesia is implemented in the articles which spread out of the Criminal Code especially offences related with “rechtspleging” and draft of law of criminal code which has been directed on its chapter itself namely Chapter VI about crime act on holding the judicature from the article 325 up to 335 of draft of law of the Criminal Code.  The conducts which could be classified as the contempt of court is now days essential in Indonesia to keep the authority and privilege of justice institution to take action againts the actors of contempt of court  to apply the articles of Criminal Code. Kata kunci : melawan hukum, sistem hukum