Barley is used as a model cereal to decipher salt tolerance mechanisms due to its simpler genome than wheat and enhanced salt tolerance compared to rice and wheat. In the present study, RNA-Seq based transcriptomic profiles were compared between salt-tolerant wild (Hordeum spontaneum, genotype no. 395) genotype and salt-sensitive cultivated (H. vulgare, ‘Mona’ cultivar) subjected to salt stress (300 mM NaCl) and control (0 mM NaCl) conditions. Plant growth and physiological attributes were also evaluated in a separate experiment as a comparison. Wild barley was significantly less impacted by salt stress than cultivated barley in growth and physiology and hence was more stress-responsive functionally. A total of 6,048 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) including 3,025 up-regulated and 3,023 down-regulated DEGs were detected in the wild genotype in salt stress conditions. The transcripts of salt-stress-related genes were profoundly lower in the salt-sensitive than the tolerant barley having a total of 2,610 DEGs (580 up- and 2,030 down-regulated). GO enrichment analysis showed that the DEGs were mainly enriched in biological processes associated with stress defenses (e.g., cellular component, signaling network, ion transporter, regulatory proteins, reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging, hormone biosynthesis, osmotic homeostasis). Comparison of the candidate genes in the two genotypes showed that the tolerant genotype contains higher functional and effective salt-tolerance related genes with a higher level of transcripts than the sensitive one. In conclusion, the tolerant genotype consistently exhibited better tolerance to salt stress in physiological and functional attributes than did the sensitive one. These differences provide a comprehensive understanding of the evolved salt-tolerance mechanism in wild barley. The shared mechanisms between these two sub-species revealed at each functional level will provide more reliable insights into the basic mechanisms of salt tolerance in barley species.
The hypericin is assumed as a highly demanded and key bioactive compound, which has antiviral, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and antitumor properties isolated from Hypericum perforatum. Nowadays, increasing bioactive molecules' contents through generating novel compounds is one of the major research objectives of H. perforatum biotechnology; however, this plant remains recalcitrant and unmanageable to Agrobacterium mediated transformation and genetic improvement programs. In order to overcome these challenges, many researchers have focused on this unruly herb using biotic and abiotic eliciting strategies. Therefore, two experiments were separately designed for the evaluation of two types of abiotic elicitors, aiming at increasing the productivity of hypericin in the adventitious root suspension culture of H. perforatum. The first one was accomplished to evaluate the effect of UV-B light elicitors (the exposure time of 30, 60, and 90 min) and the recovery treatment (with or without) on hypericin content while the second one was assessed the effect of various temperatures (4°C, 8°C, 16°C, and 25°C) in three different exposure times (24 h, 72 h, and 7 d). Based on the results, UV-B (60 min) treatment followed by the recovery produced 0.430 µg/g DW hypericin and was distinguished as the most effective UV-B elicitation treatment. In addition, a temperature of 4°C for a period of 72 hours is required to get the highest amount of hypericin content. These findings indicate the fact that hypericin biosynthesis is notably affected by UV-B exposure time and Low-temperature. The data also clearly elucidate further mechanisms of hypericin production in H. perforatum adventitious root culture.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.