This study uses the quantile mapping bias correction (QMBC) method to correct the bias in five regional climate models (RCMs) from the latest output of the Rossby Center Climate Regional Model (RCA4) over Kenya. The outputs were validated using various scalar metrics such as root-mean-square difference (RMSD), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean bias. The study found that the QMBC algorithm demonstrates varying performance among the models in the study domain. The results show that most of the models exhibit reasonable improvement after corrections at seasonal and annual timescales. Specifically, the European Community Earth-System (EC-EARTH) and Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) models depict remarkable improvement as compared to other models. On the contrary, the Institute Pierre Simon Laplace Model CM5A-MR (IPSL-CM5A-MR) model shows little improvement across the rainfall seasons (i.e., March–May (MAM) and October–December (OND)). The projections forced with bias-corrected historical simulations tallied observed values demonstrate satisfactory simulations as compared to the uncorrected RCMs output models. This study has demonstrated that using QMBC on outputs from RCA4 is an important intermediate step to improve climate data before performing any regional impact analysis. The corrected models may be used in projections of drought and flood extreme events over the study area.

The present study investigates the skills of CORDEX-CORE precipitation outputs in simulating Africa’s key seasonal climate features, emphasizing the added value (AV) of the dynamical downscaling approach from which they were derived. The results indicate the models’ good skills in capturing African rainfall patterns and dynamics at satellite-based observation resolutions, with up to 65.17% significant positive AV spatial coverage for the CCLM5 model and up to 55.47% significant positive AV spatial coverage for the REMO model. Unavoidable biases are however present in rainfall-abundant areas and are reflected in the AV results, but vary based on the season, the sub-area, and the Global Climate Model–Regional Climate Models (GCM-RCM) combination considered. The RCMs’ ensemble mean generally performs better than individual GCM–RCM simulations. A further analysis of the GCM–RCM model chain indicates a strong influence of the dynamical downscaling approach on the driving GCMs. However, exceptions are found in some seasons for specific RCMs’ outputs, where GCMs are influential. The findings also revealed that observational uncertainties can influence AV and contribute to a 6 to 34% difference in significant positive AV spatial coverage results. An analysis of these results suggests that the AV by CORDEX-CORE simulations over Africa depend on how well the GCM physics are integrated to those of the RCMs and how these features are accommodated in the high-resolution setting of the downscaling experiments. The deficiencies of the CORDEX-CORE simulations could be related to how well key processes are represented within the RCM models. For Africa, these results show that CORDEX-CORE products could be adequate for a wide range of high-resolution precipitation data applications.

Daily meteorological data at 263 stations in northern China from 1956 to 2005 were used to calculate various forest fire danger weather (FFDW) indices, such as Nesterov Index (NI), Modified Nesterov Index (MNI), Keetch-Byram Drought Index (KBDI), and Forest Fire Danger Index (FFDI), at different time scales. The relationship between each index and forest fire was analyzed. MNI and FFDI were then selected to study the impact on forest fire danger due to climatic change in northern China in the recent 50 years. Results show that forest fire danger has significantly increased in Northeast China where there is the richest forest resource in China, and also increased in North China. However, it has not changed much in eastern part of Northwest China, and the forest fire danger has even significantly decreased in northern Xinjiang. Significant rise of forest fire danger in Northeast China mainly results from the co-effect of increase of temperature, and decreases of humidity and precipitation. Relative humidity change dominants forest fire danger trends in the four forest regions in northern China.

Two persistent extreme precipitation events (PEPEs) that caused severe flooding in the Yangtze–Huai River valley in summer 2016 presented a significant challenge to operational forecasters. To provide forecasters with useful references, the capacity of two objective forecast models in predicting these two PEPEs is investigated. The objective models include a numerical weather prediction (NWP) model from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), and a statistical downscaling model, the Key Influential Systems Based Analog Model (KISAM). Results show that the ECMWF ensemble provides a skillful spectrum of solutions for determining the location of the daily heavy precipitation (≥25 mm day−1) during the PEPEs, despite its general underestimation of heavy precipitation. For lead times longer than 3 days, KISAM outperforms the ensemble mean and nearly one-half or more of all the ensemble members of ECMWF. Moreover, at longer lead times, KISAM generally performs better in reproducing the meridional location of accumulated rainfall over the two PEPEs compared to the ECMWF ensemble mean and the control run. Further verification of the vertical velocity that affects the production of heavy rainfall in ECMWF and KISAM implies the quality of the depiction of ascending motion during the PEPEs has a dominating influence on the models’ performance in predicting the meridional location of the PEPEs at all lead times. The superiority of KISAM indicates that statistical downscaling techniques are effective in alleviating the deficiency of global NWP models for PEPE forecasts in the medium range of 4–10 days.

No abstract