A digital pursuit rotor task was used to measure dual task costs of language production by young and older adults. After training on the pursuit rotor, participants were asked to track the moving target while providing a language sample. When simultaneously engaged, young adults experienced greater dual task costs to tracking, fluency, and grammatical complexity than older adults. Older adults were able to preserve their tracking performance by speaking more slowly. Individual differences in working memory, processing speed, and Stroop interference affected vulnerability to dual task costs. These results demonstrate the utility of using a digital pursuit rotor to study the effects of aging and dual task demands on language production and confirm prior findings that young and older adults use different strategies to accommodate to dual task demands.
Keywords
Language production; dual task demandsThe use of concurrent tasks to study the allocation of attention and/or working memory has a rich history in psychology and neuropsychology (Baddeley, 1986;Baddeley, Lewis, Eldridge, & Thompson, 1984;Craik, Govoni, Naveh-Benjamin, & Anderson, 1996;Rosen & Engle, 1997). The study of dual task costs has become a central concern in cognitive aging research for both practical and theoretical reasons. Dual task costs may disrupt and impair the performance of older adults are watching television while responding to conversational inquiries (Tun, O'Kane, & Wingfield, 2002), driving a car while talking on the telephone (Strayer & Johnson, 2001), or ambulating round their environment in the company of others (Li, Lindenberger, Freund, & Baltes, 2001). Dual task costs have been linked theoretically to impairments of executive function (Baddeley, 1996), arising from deficits in time-sharing between the two tasks, costs of switching between tasks, failures to update task-specific cognitive representation, or a breakdown in the inhibition of automatic responses (Salthouse, Atkinson, Berish, 2003).Previous studies have examined the "penetration" of cognitive and attentional tasks by the simultaneous performance of motor tasks such as walking or other tasks such as word memorization (Lajoie, Teasdale, Bard & Fleury, 1996;Lindenberger, Marsiske, & Baltes;Li, et al., 2001;Maylor & Wing, 1996; Maylor, Allison, & Wing, 2001;Melzer, Menjuya, & Kaplanski, 2001; Teasdale, Bard, LeRue, & Fleury, 1993; Verghese, Buschke, Viola, et al., 2002). These studies of dual task costs confirm a link between cognition and sensory-motor Correspondence should be addressed to Susan Kemper, Gerontology Center, 3090 DHDC, 1000 Sunnyside Ave., University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045 or E-mail: SKEMPER@KU.EDU. Preliminary reports of this research were presented at the annual meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, in November, 2006 and submitted by the 2 nd author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a M. A. in Psychology from the University of Kansas. (Lindenberger et al., 2000; Welford, 1958) and suggest that motor tasks such a...