This study examined the perceived requisite skills and understandings needed for a successful student teaching experience. Six instrumental music student teachers served as participants. Findings included that students perceived curricular, co-curricular, and extra-curricular music teaching and non- music teaching experiences to be valuable prior to student teaching. Valuable curricular and co-curricular (e.g. fieldwork) skills included: (a) administrative skills; (b) classroom management skills; (c) musicianship skills; and (d) content and pedagogical knowledge. The participants reported that not only did they acquire these skills from coursework, applied lessons, and ensemble participation, but also experiences outside of their curricular requirements (e.g., skills relating to work ethic, interpersonal and intrapersonal skills). The researchers compared these results to the forms of Ethical and Intellectual Development (Perry, 1968/1999) and determined that preservice music teachers' perceptions of the importance of acquired skills prior to student teaching may depend on their intellectual development.
The purpose of this study was to examine phenomenologically a special needs fieldwork experience through the perceptions of seven participants. All of the participants were a part of a long-term field experience. The research question was: How was this experience, assisting and teaching students with special needs in an elementary general music context, perceived and constructed by the participants individually and as they collaborated and interacted with one another, as indicated by journals, semistructured interviews, case writing, and field observations? A qualitative particularistic case study design was used in this investigation. Data included journals, participant interviews, observations, and an orientation session video. Findings suggested that (a) the orientation process to fieldwork with children with disabilities, which included the case method of teaching, was perceived as valuable; (b) observation, journaling, discussion, and the relationships that emerged were important to the participants; and (c) reflective practice may have occurred in this study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.