Twenty-nine children with juvenile chronic arthritis, aged from 7 to 16 yr were studied using the Juvenile Arthritis Functional Assessment Report for Children and Parents questionnaires (JAFAR-C and JAFAR-P). The results showed that JAFAR-C and JAFAR-P were highly correlated (P < 0.001) with each other and also with a predicted JAFAR score (P < 0.05). The JAFAR score correlated with the arthritic joint count at the time of the study (P < 0.01), Steinbrocker classification (P < 0.001), pain score (P < 0.01) and stiffness score (P < 0.005). Evidence of psychological dysfunction was found in eight of the 29 children (27%). Six children (21%) scored 13 or more on the Rutter A(2) for parents and one patient scored more than nine on the Rutter B(2) for teachers. Only one child had a score on the Birleson self-rating scale that was high enough to suggest a likely diagnosis of depression. The median Lipsitt self-concept scale score was 86, that expected for a healthy population. There was no correlation between the psychological scores and any of the other functional measurements, although the numbers affected were small. There was no significant difference between type of arthritis at onset with regard to any of the scores obtained.

Thirty patients with a diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease were assessed using the traditional National Adult Reading Test (NART) and also by placing the NART stimulus words in context (meaningful sentences)--the Cambridge Contextual Reading Test (CCRT) condition. Placing the stimulus words in sentences acted to significantly reduce overall pronunciation error rates. This beneficial effect was most marked for more severely cognitively impaired patients. NART performance was significantly correlated with Mini-Mental State total score; however, CCRT performance was not. Placing the stimulus words in context acted to improve the performance of more cognitively impaired Alzheimer patients and thus provides a more valid estimate of premorbid ability compared with the standard presentation of NART stimulus words in isolation.

Preliminary reports suggest improved executive function in patients with lobar dementia after treatment with single doses of the alpha 2 adrenoceptor antagonist, idazoxan. The potential for use in probable Alzheimer-type dementia prompted the present study. Fifteen patients with probable Alzheimer-type dementia were examined twice with neuropsychological measures and 14 also with single photon emission tomography (SPET) after a single double blind oral administration of 40 mg idazoxan or placebo in a balanced cross-over design. Brain perfusion maps were spatially transformed into standard stereotactic space and compared pixel-by-pixel. A parametric analysis was used to examine the relationship between the drug effect, verbal fluency and brain perfusion. Two to 3 h after idazoxan, measures of reaction time, Stroop test, category fluency and anxiety were unchanged. Verbal fluency (letter) and spatial working memory were impaired and performance on the Tower of London test in a sub-set of patients showed a trend to impairment in the idazoxan condition. Idazoxan produced a modest relative activation in left thalamus and inferior occipital cortex: decreases occurred in inferior anterior cingulate and left insular cortex. There were significant correlations on both days between measures of fluency and brain perfusion in left lateral prefrontal cortex. The reduced performance with idazoxan was directly correlated with reduced perfusion in left lateral prefrontal cortex, supporting an important interaction between drug and task performance. The imaging component of the study therefore suggested that activation of frontal networks is necessary for performing fluency tasks in Alzheimer-type dementia. Brain networks involving prefrontal cortex are the locus for the primary cognitive effects of noradrenergic drugs. The direction of the effect of any dose of agonist or antagonist may depend critically upon the age and pathology of the experimental subjects and the relationship between performance, noradrenergic drive and task difficulty.

We conclude that the DWR is not specific enough to clearly distinguish patients with early Alzheimer's disease from elderly patients with major depression.