No abstract

Abstract-Within the framework of experimental field on technologies developments for research reactors applications, an experimental program dedicated to electronics behaviour under flux has been performed on wireless (WIFI) modules. The interest of using the WIFI modules in an industrial facility is to limit and some cases to work without transmission lines between the experimental equipments in which sensors are embedded and the facility (i.e data acquisition room). The objectives of these tests were to determine the capabilities of WIFI modules to work in Nuclear Environment, to define the limitation due to the dose levels and to propose some adaptations in term of integration. These actions have been carried out on [2009][2010] period, in sharing collaboration between CEA (Commissariat a lEnergie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, France), ITN (Nuclear and Technological Institute, Portugal) and UCM (University Complutense of Madrid, Spain). The experimental program on WIFI modules took into account a first phase of data determination of dose levels based on Jules Horowitz Reactor environment. The second phase (performed by UCM and ITN) was dedicated to the selection of modules focused on commercial type (COTS approach). Then, irradiation tests of these modules using a 60 Co source and in the RPI reactor have been performed by ITN with UCM. The results obtained are presented and discussed. As conclusion, some recommendations are given.

Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR) irradiation test devices (so called ADELINE and MADISON) must undergo a periodic inspection every 40 months (French ESP(N) Regulation). The first step of inspection proposal was performed from October 2019 to March 2020 and concerns application of non-destructive methods for electron beam welds, while examining the possible methods and locations that could be utilized. This study has been performed in collaboration between VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd and French CEA with VTT employee secondment at CEA Cadarache. The initial conclusions of this work are the following: • Two inspection methods are likely needed. • Eddy current is likely suitable for surface examination while volumetric ultrasonic inspection can be used for tube bodies. • Inspection under-water in a storage pool (EPI) is likely the best option for location in the JHR. • Some automation and remote controls will be needed during the inspection process. The inspection area is quite large as the whole tube bodies will be inspected. • Internal surfaces located between the nested tubes likely cannot be inspected for corrosion and therefore, sealing the space from oxygen and water will be likely be the best option. • Experimental reference is a critical next step of the work to assess and qualify the inspection methods. As the next step, CEA will continue discussions on requirements of the mock-ups: for eddy current inspection, a Zircaloy-4 planar specimen with artificial reflectors is needed. For ultrasonic reference, a representative mock-up of the cylinder with a weld and artificial defect(s) is needed. The mock-up testing will provide an experimental reference to CIVA calculations as simulations of this work have been performed with CIVA software, which is extensively used in the industry and research organizations in simulation of non-destructive control. This study will allow further steps in the future, up to the qualification of inspection methods for JHR test devices.