No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Chronic loss of vestibular function modifies the role of neck afferents in human perception of self-motion. We characterized this change by comparing the self-motion perception of patients with chronic vestibular loss (Ps) to that of normal subjects (Ns). Stimuli consisted of sinusoidal horizontal rotations (0.025-0.4 Hz) of the trunk relative to the head (neck stimulation) and/or of the head in space (vestibular stimulation). Perception of head rotation relative to the trunk, of trunk rotation in space, or of head rotation in space was assessed in terms of gain and phase (veridical perception, G = 1 and phi = 0 degree) as well as detection threshold using a pointing procedure. (1) Perception of head rotation relative to the trunk (neck proprioception). Ps' detection threshold of head-to-trunk rotation was normal (i.e. similar to that of Ns) across all frequencies tested. Also, with peak angular velocities above 5 degrees/s, the gain of their perception was approximately normal. When peak velocity was decreased below this value, however, either by lowering stimulus frequency with peak displacement kept constant (+/- 8 degrees) or by decreasing peak displacement at constant frequency (0.05 Hz), the gain increased above unity, unlike in Ns. In contrast, the phase remained normal (approximately 0 degree). (2) Perception of trunk rotation in space. Ps perceived their trunks as stationary during neck stimulation and all vestibular-neck combinations at medium to low frequencies. At 0.4 Hz, however, Ps consistently perceived the trunk rotation, conceivably due to somatosensory self-motion cues arising from high body acceleration. In contrast, Ns perceive a trunk-in-space rotation with the neck stimulation and most of the stimulus combinations across the whole frequency range tested. Ns perceived their trunks as stationary only during head rotation on the stationary trunk (presumed to reflect a mutual cancellation of neck and vestibular signals). (3) Perception of head rotation in space. In Ps, unlike Ns, this perception always resembled that of head rotation relative to the trunk. (4) When Ps were presented with a visual or somatosensory space reference (not motion cues), their perception of trunk and head rotation in space became approximately normal. (5) We suggest that there are basically two changes in the neck-induced self-motion perception associated with chronic vestibular loss. First, neck proprioception shows a non-linear gain that overemphasizes low stimulus velocities, for unknown reasons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

In patients with loss of vestibular functions, we studied psychophysically the self-motion perception for ‘trunk in space’ and ‘head in space’ during various combinations of horizontal head and trunk rotation in the dark. The results were compared to those of normal subjects. For their ‘trunk in space’ perception, the subjects relied on their internal image of space, derived from the vestibular receptors in the head, and referred their trunk to this as a reference by adding to it a nuchal trunk-to-head signal. The patients, by contrast, always considered the trunk as stationary. Obviously because they were devoid of any space cues, they abandoned or suppressed a neck contribution to their ‘trunk in space’ perception, which, in fact, would yield an erroneous perception in almost all conditions in the dark. Both the patients and the subjects based their ‘head in space’ perception on their internal representation of ‘trunk in space’ and added to this a nuchal head-to-trunk signal. However, the patients’ head-to-trunk signal, unlike that of the subjects, was considerably larger than the actual head-to-trunk rotation at low stimulus frequency. We relate this finding to some unconscious modification of their neck muscle activity during passive head rotation. It appears that the patients’ gain of the neck input per se is not increased, but rather that subsets of this input are modified according to the particular function they serve.