Intrusion detection systems (IDS) are one of the most promising ways for securing data and networks; In recent decades, IDS has used a variety of categorization algorithms. These classifiers, on the other hand, do not work effectively unless they are combined with additional algorithms that can alter the classifier's parameters or select the optimal sub-set of features for the problem. Optimizers are used in tandem with classifiers to increase the stability and with efficiency of the classifiers in detecting invasion. These algorithms, on the other hand, have a number of limitations, particularly when used to detect new types of threats. In this paper, the NSL KDD dataset and KDD Cup 99 is used to find the performance of the proposed classifier model and compared; These two IDS dataset is preprocessed, then Auto Cryptographic Denoising (ACD) adopted to remove noise in the feature of the IDS dataset; the classifier algorithms, K-Means and Neural network classifies the dataset with adam optimizer. IDS classifier is evaluated by measuring performance measures like f-measure, recall, precision, detection rate and accuracy. The neural network obtained the highest classifying accuracy as 91.12% with drop-out function that shows the efficiency of the classifier model with drop-out function for KDD Cup99 dataset. Explaining their power and limitations in the proposed methodology that could be used in future works in the IDS area.

The drastic advancements in the field of Information Technology make it possible to analyze, manage and handle large-scale environment data and spatial information acquired from diverse sources. Nevertheless, this process is a more challenging task where the data accessibility has been performed in an unstructured, varied, and incomplete manner. The appropriate extraction of information from diverse data sources is crucial for evaluating natural disaster management. Therefore, an effective framework is required to acquire essential information in a structured and accessible manner. This research concentrates on modeling an efficient ontology-based evaluation framework to facilitate the queries based on the flood disaster location. It offers a reasoning framework with spatial and feature patterns to respond to the generated query. To be specific, the data is acquired from the urban flood disaster environmental condition to perform data analysis hierarchically and semantically. Finally, data evaluation can be accomplished by data visualization and correlation patterns to respond to higher-level queries. The proposed ontology-based evaluation framework has been simulated using the MATLAB environment. The result exposes that the proposed framework obtains superior significance over the existing frameworks with a lesser average query response time of 7 seconds.

The Editor-in-Chief and the publisher have retracted this article. The article was submitted to be part of a guest-edited issue. An investigation by the publisher found a number of articles, including this one, with a number of concerns, including but not limited to compromised editorial handling and peer review process, inappropriate or irrelevant references or not being in scope of the journal or guest-edited issue. Based on the investigation's findings the Editor-in-Chief therefore no longer has confidence in the results and conclusions of this article.Author M. BalaAnand disagrees with this retraction. Author S. Karthik has not explicitly stated whether they agree or disagree with this retraction.Author N. Karthikeyan has not responded to correspondence regarding this retraction.Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The Editor-in-Chief and the publisher have retracted this article. This article was submitted to be part of a guest-edited issue. An investigation concluded that the editorial process of this guest-edited issue was compromised by a third party and that the peer review process has been manipulated. Based on the investigation's findings the Editor-in-Chief therefore no longer has confidence in the results and conclusions of this article.All authors disagree with the retraction.Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.