Aim-To investigate the use of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the routine laboratory for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples. Methods-Samples were divided and processed separately for the detection of M tuberculosis by microscopy, culture and PCR. After DNA extraction, PCR was performed with primers specific for the insertion element IS6110 and the product was analysed by agarose gel electrophoresis, Southern blotting or dot blotting and hybridisation with a digoxigenin labelled internal probe. Each sample was tested for inhibitors of Taq polymerase with the aid ofan internal control. Multiple negative and positive controls were used to monitor each step of the procedure. Results-The data from two laboratories, using the same operating procedures, were combined. Of 1957 specimens, 79 (4%) were culture and PCR positive, while 1839 (93.9%) were negative in both tests. Thirty specimens (1-5%) were PCR positive only and nine (0.5%) were culture positive but PCR negative. Conclusion-Using culture and clinical history as the gold standard, sensitivity and specificity for PCR were 92-1% and 99-8%, respectively. With elaborate precautions, PCR is a suitable and reliable method for the detection ofM tuberculosis in clinical samples in a routine microbiology laboratory. (J Clin Pathol 1995;48:810-814)

No abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the laboratory performance of nucleic acid amplification tests (NATs) for detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. A proficiency panel consisting of eight sputum specimens and four specimens diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was sent to 82 laboratories in 23 countries by the Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD) TB programme. The performance of different NATs was analysed in combination with a questionnaire on the applied methods. Seventy-eight participants (95.2%) contributed a total of 85 evaluable data sets. The percentage of correct results on the eight sputum samples was 86.3% (586/679). Of the sputum specimens considered as 'smear-negatives' (650 CFU/250 micro L), only 61.2% (104/170) were reported positive. The percentage of correct results for the three scored PBS samples was 75.7% (193/255). The total number of false-positive results was 11 (4.3%); these were reported for seven (8.2%) of the 85 data sets. In 32 (37.6%) data sets an 'in-house' NAT method was used, and in 53 (62.4%) sets a commercial assay was tested. The percentage of data sets achieving correct results on all sputum samples was 35.3% and 37.8%, respectively. For the PBS samples this was 45.8% and 41.5%. Overall, the results of this study demonstrated that the performance of NATs for the detection of M. tuberculosis has improved since previous studies. The percentage of false-positives has decreased considerably. However, a large number of procedures still lack sufficient sensitivity for application to smear-negative samples.

No abstract

A microwell hybridization assay was developed for the detection of the PCR products from both Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex bacteria and the recombinant Mycobacterium smegmatis strain 1008 that is used as an internal control to monitor inhibition in the PCR based on the M. tuberculosis complex-specific insertion sequence IS6110. The test is based on specific detection with digoxigenin-labeled oligonucleotide probes of biotinylated PCR products which are captured in a microtiter plate coated with streptavidin. The captured PCR products are hybridized separately with two probes, one specific for the PCR product from IS6110 from M. tuberculosis complex and the other specific for the PCR fragment from the modified IS6110 fragment from the recombinant M. smegmatis 1008. The microwell hybridization assay discriminates perfectly between the two types of amplicon. The amount of PCR product that can be detected by this assay is 10 times less than that which can be detected by agarose gel electrophoresis. The test can be performed in 2 h. It is much faster and less laborious than Southern blot hybridization. Furthermore, the interpretation of results is objective. The assay was used with 172 clinical samples in a routine microbiology laboratory, and the results were in complete agreement with those of agarose gel electrophoresis and Southern blot hybridization.