SOD and SDD have marked effects on the bacterial ecology in an ICU, with rising ceftazidime resistance prevalence rates in the respiratory tract during intervention and a considerable rebound effect of ceftazidime resistance in the intestinal tract after discontinuation of SDD.

No abstract

An outbreak of psittacosis in a veterinary teaching hospital was recognized in December 2004. Outbreak management was instituted to evaluate the extent of the outbreak and to determine the avian source. Real-time PCR, serologic testing and sequencing of the ompA gene of Chlamydophila psittaci were performed. Sputum samples from patients, throat-swab samples from exposed students and staff, and faecal specimens from parrots and pigeons were tested. In this outbreak, 34 % (10/29) of the tested individuals were infected. The clinical features of the infection ranged from none to sepsis with multi-organ failure requiring intensive-care-unit admission. C. psittaci genotype A was identified as the outbreak strain. Parrots, recently exposed to a group of cockatiels coming from outside the teaching facility, which were used in a practical class, appeared to be the source of the outbreak. One of the tested pigeons harboured an unrelated C. psittaci genotype B strain. The microbiological diagnosis by real-time PCR on clinical specimens allowed for rapid outbreak management; subsequent genotyping of the isolates identified the avian source. Recommendations are made to reduce the incidence and extent of future outbreaks.

Aim-To investigate the use of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the routine laboratory for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples. Methods-Samples were divided and processed separately for the detection of M tuberculosis by microscopy, culture and PCR. After DNA extraction, PCR was performed with primers specific for the insertion element IS6110 and the product was analysed by agarose gel electrophoresis, Southern blotting or dot blotting and hybridisation with a digoxigenin labelled internal probe. Each sample was tested for inhibitors of Taq polymerase with the aid ofan internal control. Multiple negative and positive controls were used to monitor each step of the procedure. Results-The data from two laboratories, using the same operating procedures, were combined. Of 1957 specimens, 79 (4%) were culture and PCR positive, while 1839 (93.9%) were negative in both tests. Thirty specimens (1-5%) were PCR positive only and nine (0.5%) were culture positive but PCR negative. Conclusion-Using culture and clinical history as the gold standard, sensitivity and specificity for PCR were 92-1% and 99-8%, respectively. With elaborate precautions, PCR is a suitable and reliable method for the detection ofM tuberculosis in clinical samples in a routine microbiology laboratory. (J Clin Pathol 1995;48:810-814)

In order to investigate the reliability of detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in cervical smears, we have compared the performance of two HPV PCR systems, the CPI/IIG and MY09/11 primer-mediated PCRs and the Hybrid Capture System HPV DNA detection test (hybrid capture assay), in detecting HPV DNA in cervical smears. We also included in our study the MY09/11B PCR plus SHARP (solution hybridization assay for PCR products) Signal System. This SHARP Signal System was recently developed to detect MY09/ 11B-generated biotinylated PCR products. The detection rate of the hybrid capture assay was lower than those of the CPI/IIG and MY09/11 PCRs and the MY09/11B PCR plus SHARP Signal System. The detection rates of the CPI/IIG PCR and the MY09/11B PCR plus SHARP Signal System were similar and higher than that of the conventional MY09/11 PCR system. The agreement beyond chance of the PCR methods was nearly perfect (kappa value between 0.82 and 0.84). The agreement beyond chance of the hybrid capture assay and the PCR methods was fair to good (kappa value between 0.64 and 0.70). The systems detected HPV DNA in different but overlapping sets of smears. Our results indicate that each of the detection methods alone underestimates the prevalence of HPV.