This study has shown that the CRR at day 7 correlates with renal function up to 5 years post-transplantation and with long-term graft survival. We have also demonstrated that amongst patients with reduced graft function after transplantation, two groups with significantly different outcomes exist.
We conducted a cohort study assessing risk factors for developing urinary incontinence following childbirth, and a pilot randomized controlled trial of a physiotherapist-led intervention to reduce incidence of incontinence. A total of 723 women were recruited to the cohort study, of which 234 entered the nested trial and were randomized to intensive training in pelvic floor exercises or standard information. At 6 months post-partum, 45% of women reported some incontinence problems. A pre-existing incontinence problem was the best predictor of future incontinence (odds ratio 4.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.09-6.53). Chronic constipation (1.86, 1.03-3.34) and episiotomy in at least one delivery (1.96, 1.25-3.07) were also independent risk factors, while an epidural or spinal (0.62, 0.42-0.92) was protective. The intervention as designed did not help in preventing future incontinence (relative risk 1.28, 95% CI 0.98-1.67), but this may be due to the failure to persuade the women to return for the classes. Any intervention aimed at promoting postnatal pelvic floor exercises should be limited to women who have already been experiencing incontinence problems.
Prolonged cold ischaemic time (CIT) is associated with delayed initial graft function and may also have a negative impact on long-term graft outcome. We carried out a study comparing the long-term graft survival rates between those recipients who received the first of a pair of donor kidneys versus the recipient of the second graft.Adult kidney transplant recipients who received one of a pair of donor kidneys at our institution between 1989-1995 were included. All recipients received a cyclosporin based immunosupression regimen. Graft survival rates were compared between the 2 groups at 1-, 3-, 5-and 10-year intervals. A total of 520 renal transplant grafts were included in this study. Mean donor age was 35.4 years. Groups were similar for recipient age, gender, number of HLA mismatches, transplant number for that patient and percentage PRA. CIT was the only variable that was significantly different between the two groups; mean of 19.93 h in the first group compared to 25.65 h in the second group. Graft survival rates for the first kidney were significantly better than the second kidney-graft survival at 1 year 88.5% versus 84.7%, at 3 years 81.8% versus 76.7%, at 5 years 72.2% versus 64.9% and at 10 years 55.2% versus 40% (p = 0.012). Patient survival rates were similar in both groups.In our experience, the long-term graft survival rates are significantly better for the first kidney transplanted compared to the second kidney.
Pediatric donors (less than 12 years old) are a potentially important source of kidneys for adult recipients. Previous reports of decreased graft survival and increased complication rates have made surgeons wary of using such kidneys. In 64 kidneys from younger donors transplanted to adult recipients the delayed graft function rate (41 versus 42%), and 2 and 3-year graft survival rates (67 versus 72% and 61 versus 65%, respectively) were similar to those seen with kidneys from adult donors. Kidneys from donors 24 months old or less experienced an 80% rate of graft loss at 1 year. When these kidneys are excluded the 1-year graft survival rate was similar to kidneys from older and younger donors (70 versus 77%). Mean serum creatinine at 1 year was similar in both groups (155 +/- 21 versus 151 +/- 10). Pediatric kidneys except those obtained from donors 2 years old or less are suitable for adult recipients. However, kidneys from very young donors may be more appropriate to pediatric recipients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.