This research to determine the profile of the argumentation skills of senior high school (SMA) class XI MIPA 3, students on the ecosystem material that has been learned. By using descriptive method and quantitative approach. The research was conducted at SMAN 2 Sukabumi in the academic year 2020/2021 with a total sample of 13 males and 23 females in class XI MIPA 3. Purposive sampling is a technique for sampling. This research is a description of 22 questions, and research instruments measure the scientific argumentation skills of students. This question refers to the criteria and indicator level for the Toulmin argumentation pattern. The results of the research in class XI MIPA 3 that the students wrote argument ability was still low, this shown by the results of the highest percentage at level 1, namely 26 % and level 2 at 34%. At the same time, the percentage of the argumentation indicator in rebuttal is only 13%. The student's argumentation skills for men with an average score of 48.2 and women's are 67.5. Therefore, the quality of students written arguments is still weak and needs to be improved again by using a learning approach that can train students written argumentation skills.

Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) are substantial abilities that students must have as a basis for complex thinking skills. This study aims to determine the Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) of eighth-grade students on biotechnology material. The research method used is qualitative. The population in this study were students at one of the boarding schools in the Sukabumi district. The research sample consisted of 24 students. The instrument used was multiple-choice test questions with four choice options. The questions used in this study have a reliability of 0.7 (sufficient) and validity of 0.8 (high). The research data showed that the students 'HOTS ability was still low. The t-test results, which compared the students' acquisition scores with the completeness score (60), obtained a sig value of 0.78, meaning that there was no difference in the mastery score and the HOTS acquisition of students. Calculation data based on cognitive level categories, learning indicators, and achievement categories also show that the HOTS ability of students is still low

Berlandaskan perhitungan dan analisis kerja Dinas Perumahan dan Permukiman di Kabupaten Lampung Selatanyang dilakukan dengan cara membandingkan rencana dengan tingkat realisasi, dapat diindikasikan bahwa tingkat capaian kinerja atas program yang telah dibuat, terlihat bahwa perolehan angka capaian berada di luar rencana yang diharapkan, sehingga memicu penilaian kinerja menjadi kurang objektif. Hal ini justru akan menjadi masalah karena bisa menyebabkan rendahnya tingkat akuntabilitas kinerja, dimana realisasi kinerja program kegiatan yang belum sepenuhnya dilaksanakan atau bisa diartikan anggaran berbasis kinerja dan kejelasan sasaran anggaran belum sepenuhnya optimal untuk dapat dipertanggungjawabkan. sampel yang digunakan adalah sampling jenuh. berdasarkan hasil observasi bertujuan untuk melihat apakah anggaran berbasis kinerja berpengaruh terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja di instansi pemerintahan. Berdasarkan hasil Uji T thitung  16,839 ttabel 1,833(terlampir ttabel) dengan tingkat Sig. 0,000 0,05. Sehingga dapat diartikan bahwa variabel Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja (X) mempunyai pengaruh secara signifikan terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah, dan didapatkan hasil Uji Determinan R2 sebesar 0,649 yang berarti variabel Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja (X) mempunyai pengaruh terhadap variabel Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (Y) sebesar 64,9 %. Yang berartikan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja berpengaruh besar terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah pada Dinas Perumahan Dan Permukiman Kabupaten Lampung Selatan.