Abstract. The influence of photoperiod on the thermal requirements for development was discovered for the first time in insects during experiments on the linden-bug, Pyrrhocoris apterus. The effect of photoperiod on the duration of linden-bug development at five constant temperatures (20, 22, 24, 26 and 28°C) was measured and the thermal requirements for development at three photoperiods (14, 17 and 20 h light per day) were calculated. Bugs from four geographic populations were used in these experiments: Pyatigorsk (44°02´N, 43°04´E), Borisovka (50°36´N, 36°01´E), Mikhailov (54°15´N, 39°0´E) and Ryazan (54°36´N, 39°42´E).From the values of individual development times at different temperatures the coefficient of linear regression of development rate (the inverse of the duration) on temperature and the thermal threshold for development were calculated. Both these parameters were found to decrease significantly with decrease in day-length for all four populations studied. It means that at shorter day-lengths nymphal development is less dependent on temperature compared to the development at longer day-lengths. These effects seem to be adaptive. The development times of nymphs at relatively high temperatures (above 24-25°C) are shorter under long-days than under short days which should be advantageous at the height of summer when the days are long and the weather is warm. In the contrast, at relatively low temperatures (below 24-25°C) the nymphs develop significantly faster under short-days than under long days, which is advantageous at the end of summer as it allows the nymphs to reach the adult stage, the only stage capable of overwintering. The influence of photoperiod on the thermal reaction norm appeared to be more or less gradual, i.e. the shorter the day-length the shallower the slope of the regression line of development rate on temperature and the lower the thermal threshold for development. An analysis of the literature shows that this effect of photoperiod on the thermal requirements for development is widespread among insects but has been overlooked by previous authors. The authors conclude that the variation in the development time observed in insects at different seasons, photoperiods or food regimes, or from different populations, etc., are generally due to some modification of the thermal reaction norms and more specifically to differences in the thermal requirements for development.

Amara communis larvae were found to develop significantly faster and to have higher growth rate at short-day (12 h) as compared to long-day (22 h) photoperiods at all used temperatures (16, 18, 20, and 22°С). The coefficient of linear regression of larval development rate on temperature was significantly higher at the short day than at the long day. The thermal developmental thresholds appeared similar at both photoperiods. Body weight of young beetles reared under different photoperiods was almost the same. Thus, photoperiod does not simply accelerate or decelerate insect development, but modifies the thermal reaction norm. At short days, larval development becomes faster and more temperature-dependent, which provides a timely completion of development at the end of summer. The analysis of literature data has allowed us to find the photoperiodic modification of thermal requirements for development in 5 insect orders: Orthoptera, Heteroptera, Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, and Diptera. Modification may result in significant changes in the slope of the regression line, and hence the sum of degree-days, and in the thermal developmental threshold. Consequently, the thermal requirements for development in many insects gradually vary during summer under the effect of changing day-length, which may have adaptive significance. Thus, the photoperiodic modification of thermal reaction norms acts as a specific form of seasonal control of insect development.

Temperature and nutrition are crucial environmental variables that determine rates of growth and development in insects. However, the simultaneous effect of these factors on life‐history traits is rarely addressed. In the present study, the influence of two diets (linden fruit and sunflower seeds) on the duration of immature stages and thermal reaction norms for development is tested in the bug Pyrrhocoris apterus L. (Heteroptera: Pyrrhocoridae). Eggs and larvae are reared at five constant temperatures (20, 22, 24, 26 and 28 °C) under an LD 20 : 4 h photocycle. Development rates deviate from linearity in the studied thermal range, especially in larvae; therefore, a nonlinear (power‐law) approximation is also attempted. Parental diet causes no change in thermal reaction norms for egg development. However, the progeny of sunflower‐fed bugs are more variable in terms of their development time, suggesting a transgenerational effect. Larval mortality rates increase in cooler conditions and are always higher on sunflower seeds. This is accompanied by more variable, less temperature‐dependent and generally slower larval development. A review of previously published case studies on temperature–diet interactions in the control of insect development leads to two general conclusions. First, there are two approaches for assessing the temperature‐dependent development in insects: one based on the concept of the sum of degree‐days and the other based on the concept of reaction norm. Despite an obvious non‐exclusiveness, the two approaches appear to have developed in isolation from each other. Second, three principal patterns of temperature–diet interactions can be recognized. The pattern found in P. apterus (the direct effects of diet are stronger at higher temperatures and much weaker or absent at lower temperatures) appears to be the most widespread.

No abstract

http://www.eje.cz tion, analysis and synthesis. At fi rst glance, the sheer variety of taxa, lifestyles, photoperiodic responses and, last but not least, experimental designs is so wide that drawing any generalizations seems challenging. Furthermore, it has long been noted that the rate-controlling effect of photoperiod may depend on other factors, especially temperature. The difference may be merely quantitative such that a particular photoperiod exerts a strong effect at one temperature and little or no effect at another (Vinogradova, 1960; Ingram & Jenner, 1976), but sometimes there is a reversal of photoperiodic effect at high temperatures relative to that in cooler conditions, e.g., acceleration versus retardation (Geispitz et al., 1971; Goryshin & Akhmedov, 1971; Lopatina et al., 2007). Due to the growing appreciation of the role of reaction norms in adaptive evolution (Schlichting & Pigliucci, 1998; Murren et al., 2014; Kivelä et al., 2015), these photoperiod-temperature interactions are currently interpreted as photoperiodic plasticity of thermal reaction norms for growth and development (Gotthard et al., 1999; Lopatina et al., 2007; Kutcherov et al., 2015). However, studies on insect growth and development at several combinations of temperature and photoperiod have also produced a patchwork of examples with nearly as Convergent photoperiodic plasticity in developmental rate in two species of insects with widely different thermal phenotypes