Objetivo: Avaliar eficácia da terapia de ondas de choque focal (f-ESWT) comparada ao placebo para dor e incapacidade em pacientes com osteoartrose de joelho (OA). Métodos: Ensaio clínico randomizado, duplo-cego, placebo controlado, pacientes com OA primária de joelhos realizaram exercícios (alongamentos de isquiotibiais e fortalecimento de quadríceps) e randomizados em f-ESWT ou placebo. Todos os pacientes foram submetidos a 4 sessões semanais de 7.000 pulsos, e no grupo f-ESWT a energia foi de até 0.15mJ/mm2. O desfecho primário foi a escala analógica visual (VAS) para dor em 1 mês. Os desfechos secundários foram WOMAC, TUG, Lequesne e índice de resposta OMERACT-OARSI em 1 e 3 meses; bem como VAS aos 3 meses e eventos adversos (EAs). O teste de Mann-Whitney U e o teste exato Fisher foram utilizados com alfa = 5% e poder = 80% em uma análise de intenção de tratar. Os desfechos contínuos foram relatados como média ± desvio padrão. Resultados: 18 pacientes (9 em cada grupo), idade de 60.6±8.7 com 33.3% homens. Não houve diferença significativa entre grupos em qualquer variável. F-ESWT não foi superior ao placebo em 1 mês: VAS = -2,97 ± 3,18 e -2,68 ± 2,33 cm, respectivamente, p = 0,96. Somente o TUG no 1º mês foi significativo: 9.09 ± 2.30 e 11.01 ± 2.85 seg, p = 0.01. Conclusão: f-ESWT não foi superior ao placebo para osteoartrose de joelhos. Este estudo foi insuficiente para detectar diferenças. Novos estudos devem usar WOMAC A (subescala dor) como desfecho primário e recrutar 92 pacientes.

ObjectivesThe study investigated the long-term functional status of hospitalised COVID-19 survivors to explore and document their functional situation.DesignThis prospective observational study assessed 801 COVID-19 survivors at 3–11 months after hospital discharge. It analyses participants' sociodemographic background, COVID-19 clinical manifestations, and clinical and functional evaluations.SettingTertiary-level university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.ParticipantsStudy participants are COVID-19 survivors admitted to hospital care for at least 24 hours to treat acute SARS-CoV-2 infection.Outcome measuresEpworth Sleepiness Scale, EuroQoL-5 Dimensions-5 Levels, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue, Functional Independence Measure, Functional Oral Intake Scale, Handgrip Strength, Insomnia Severity Index, Medical Research Council (MRC) Dyspnea Scale, MRC sum score, Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale, pain Visual Analogue Scale, Post-COVID-19 Functional Status, Timed Up and Go, WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0, 1-Minute Sit to Stand Test.ResultsMany participants required invasive mechanical ventilation (41.57%, 333 of 801). Mean age was 55.35±14.58 years. With a mean of 6.56 (SD: 1.58; 95% CI: 6.45 to 6.67) months after hospital discharge, 70.86% (567 of 800) reported limited daily activities, which were severe in 5.62% (45 of 800). They also reported pain and discomfort (64.50%, 516 of 800), breathlessness (64.66%, 514 of 795), and anxiety and depression (57.27%, 457 of 798). Daytime sleepiness and insomnia evaluations showed subthreshold results. Most (92.85%, 727 of 783) participants reported unrestricted oral intake. Data indicated no generalised fatigue (mean score: 39.18, SD: 9.77; 95% CI: 38.50 to 39.86). Assessments showed poor handgrip strength (52.20%, 379 of 726) and abnormal Timed Up and Go results (mean 13.07 s, SD: 6.49). The invasive mechanical ventilation group seemed to have a better handgrip strength however. We found no clear trends of change in their functional status during months passed since hospital discharge.ConclusionsMuscle weakness, pain, anxiety, depression, breathlessness, reduced mobility, insomnia and daytime sleepiness were the most prevalent long-term conditions identified among previously hospitalised COVID-19 survivors.

A COVID-19 tem consequências sensório motoras, cognitivas, psíquicas e nutricionais que necessitam de reabilitação. Objetivo: Descrever o programa de reabilitação ambulatorial desenvolvido no Instituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, otimizado, intensivo e de curta duração. Método: Obtivemos informações sociodemográficas e clínicas de 12 adultos com diagnóstico laboratorial de COVID-19, grave e crítica, que necessitaram de hospitalização na fase aguda. Avaliações funcionais: Escala de Medida de Independência Funcional (MIF), EQ-5D-5L, World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0), Post-COVID-19 Functional Status scale, Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea scale, escala visual analógica (EVA) para dor, DN-4 (Douleur Neuropathique 4), escala de sonolência de Epworth, Índice de Gravidade da Insônia, Montreal Ontario Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), escala de Depressão, ansiedade e estresse (DASS-21), avaliação nutricional, Timed Up and Go, teste de caminhada de 10 metros, teste de preensão palmar, MRC sum score, ultrassonografia musculoesquelética da coxa antes, durante e após programa de reabilitação ambulatorial. Este incluiu estimulação magnética indutiva e elétrica musculoesquelética, tratamento por ondas de choque extracorpóreas, exercícios isocinéticos, abordagem emocional, estimulação cognitiva, estimulação do desempenho ocupacional, orientação nutricional e programa educacional por aplicativo COMVC. O tratamento foi realizado duas vezes por semana até atingir os critérios de alta pré-estabelecidos. Resultados: VAS e TUG proporcionaram melhora estatisticamente significante (p <0,001). PCFS, MIF, Handgrip, 10 MWT e DASS-21 domínio ansiedade apresentam tendências de melhora. Conclusão: O programa melhora a dor, mobilidade e ansiedade em pacientes com COVID longa.

BackgroundKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability in the elderly population. Chronic disabling pain is associated with maladaptive neuroplastic changes in brain networks, commonly associated with central sensitization. The main clinical features of nociplastic pain conditions include combined peripheral and central sensitization, and it is crucial to recognize this type of pain, as it responds to different therapies than nociceptive and neuropathic pain.ObjectiveTo report the effect of the Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (IMREA) comprehensive rehabilitation program to reduce pain and to improve functioning in elderly people with knee OA, under the DEFINE cohort.MethodsThis is a retrospective observational cohort of 96 patients with knee OA, recruited from October 2018 to December 2019. All patients were evaluated by a trained multidisciplinary team using the Kellgren Lawrence classification, bilateral knee ultrasonography, the visual analog scale (VAS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain, rigidity and difficulty scores, the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), 10-m and 6-min walking test (10 and 6 MWT), Berg Balance Scale, isokinetic dynamometry for knee extension and flexion strength, and pain pressure thresholds. The rehabilitation program included paraspinous lidocaine blocks, focal extracorporeal shockwaves combined with radial pressure waves and functional electrical stimulation according to individual needs. The baseline was compred with the treatment results with a paired t-test.ResultsThe study sample is composed of 96 participants, mostly females (n = 81, 84.38%), with bilateral osteoarthritis (n = 91, 94.79%), and a mean age of 68.89 (SD 9.73) years. Functional improvement was observed in TUG (p = 0.019), 6-mwt (p = 0.033), right knee flexion strength (p &lt; 0.0001), WOMAC rigidity and difficulty domains (p &lt; 0.0001). Pain was reduced from baseline as measured by WOMAC pain domain (p &lt; 0.0001), VAS for both knees (p &lt; 0.0001), and SF-36 pain domain (p &lt; 0.0001). Pressure pain threshold was modified above the patella (p = 0.005 and p = 0.002 for right and left knees, respectively), at the patellar tendons (p = 0.015 and p = 0.010 for right and left patellar tendons, respectively), left S2 dermatome (p = 0.017), and L1-L2 (p = 0.008).ConclusionsThe IMREA comprehensive rehabilitation program improved functioning and reduced disabling pain in elderly people with knee OA. We highlight the relevance and discuss the implementation of our intervention protocol. Although this is an open cohort study, it is important to note the significant improvement with this clinical protocol.