The participation of the mitochondrial pathway in paclitaxel-induced apoptosis has been well documented. After addition of paclitaxel to U937 cells, however, we observed an early expression of five endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response genes that preceded the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria and the cleavage of the caspases. Involvement of the ER was supported by the following evidence. Paclitaxel treatment not only activated calpain and caspase-4, but also induced a gradual increase in the cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration at 3-6 h. Paclitaxel-induced apoptosis can be inhibited by the calpain inhibitor calpeptin and IP(3) receptor inhibitors. Either buffering of the cytosolic Ca(2+) or inhibition of mitochondrial calcium uptake reduced BiP expression. These inhibitors also reduced mitochondrial apoptotic signals, such as mitochondrion membrane potential disruption, cytochrome c release and eventually reduced the death of U937 cells. Paclitaxel-induced Bax/Bak translocation to the ER and Bax dimerization on the ER membrane occurred within 3 h, which led to a Ca(2+) efflux into cytosol. Moreover, we found that cytochrome c translocated to the ER after releasing from mitochondria and then interacted with the IP(3) receptor at 12-15 h. This phenomenon has been known to amplify apoptotic signaling. Taken together, ER would seem to contribute to paclitaxel-induced apoptosis via both the early release of Ca(2+) and the late amplification of mitochondria-mediated apoptotic signals.
Acetylcholine (ACh), synthesized in the pituitary, can act locally to modulate pituitary function. We used rat primary anterior pituitary (AP) cells to investigate how ACh affects pituitary prolactin (PRL) secretion in the presence or absence of known PRL regulators: thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH), 17β-estradiol (E2) and triiodothyronine (T3). Cultured AP cells were prepared from ovariectomized rats and pretreated with diluent, 0.6 nM E2, 10 nM T3, or E2 plus T3 for 5 days, then challenged with various doses of ACh or muscarinic receptor agonists (oxotremorine or carbachol) and TRH (100 nM) for 20 min. Significant ACh (10–5M) suppression of both basal and TRH-induced PRL secretion was not evident in diluent-, E2- or T3-pretreated cells, but observed only in cells pretreated with both E2 and T3. Moreover, in E2 plus T3-pretreated cells, oxotremorine and carbachol, like ACh (10–7–10–5M), suppressed both responses in a dose- related manner. Pertussis toxin (PTX; 100 ng/ml) as well as atropine (a muscarinic receptor antagonist; 1 mM) blocked these effects of cholinomimetics. ACh also inhibited both PRL responses elicited by drugs elevating intracellular cAMP (10 µM forskolin) or Ca2+ (1 µM Bay K-8644) in a PTX-sensitive manner. ACh inhibition of basal PRL secretion was unaltered by intracellular Ca2+ mobilization blockers, TMB-8 (100 µM) and thapsigargin (1 µM), but abrogated by the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor (300 µM L-NAME). ACh inhibition of TRH-induced PRL secretion was accentuated by TMB-8 and alleviated by thapsigargin or L-NAME. In summary, muscarinic inhibition of either basal or TRH-induced PRL secretion was augmented by E2 and T3, and involved the PTX-sensitive cAMP/Ca2+ pathways. Furthermore, nitric oxide mediated the basal rather than TRH-induced PRL response to ACh, whereas the intracellular Ca2+ mobilization concerned the TRH-induced rather than the basal PRL response to ACh. Thus, ACh synthesized in the AP appears to inhibit basal vs. TRH-induced PRL secretion via different mechanisms.
Transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) synthesized in the pituitary may act as an autocrine/paracrine regulator of lactotrope function. We examined the effects of TGF-beta 1 on PRL messenger RNA (mRNA), PRL synthesis, and PRL secretion in cultured anterior pituitary (AP) cells from rats at different ages. APs excised from ovariectomized female Sprague-Dawley rats, either young(2-3 months old; average serum PRL: 9 ng/ml), middle-aged (11-12 months old; average serum PRL: 133 ng/ml), or old (24 months old; average serum PRL: 159 ng/ml), were dispersed and cultured for 5 days. Then, cells were washed and challenged with increasing doses of TGF-beta 1 (0-100 ng/ml) for 1-48 h in serum-free medium. Northern blot analysis showed an increase in basal PRL mRNA levels, and a decrease in responsiveness to TGF-beta 1 with age. TGF-beta 1 suppressed PRL mRNA in a dose- and time-dependent manner in cells from young rats. Maximum inhibition was observed at 0.5-1 ng/ml of TGF-beta 1. At 0.5 ng/ml TGF-beta 1, significant reduction in PRL mRNA was detected at 6 h, and maximum inhibition was observed at 12-48 h post TGF-beta 1 incubation. Cells from middle-aged rats were less responsive to TGF-beta 1, whereas cells from old rats did not seem to respond under our experimental conditions. In addition to its effect on PRL mRNA in young AP cells, TGF-beta 1 dose dependently inhibited the rate of PRL synthesis, as indicated by reduced [35S]methionine incorporation into immunoprecipitated PRL. Responsiveness of PRL synthesis to TGF-beta 1 inhibition also decreased with age; however, significant inhibition by TGF-beta 1 on PRL synthesis could still be observed in old AP cells. Analysis by RIA demonstrated that young AP cells produced lower levels (15 micrograms/10(6) cells.24 h) of PRL in culture medium than old AP cells (32 micrograms/10(6) cells.24 h). TGF-beta 1 decreased medium PRL levels in old AP cells as efficaciously as in young AP cells. Significant reduction in medium PRL secreted by young AP cells was observed at 3 h when changes in both PRL mRNA and PRL synthesis were not evident. Taken together, our data suggest that TGF-beta 1 affects PRL production at multiple levels. Moreover, its inhibition on PRL synthesis and mRNA expression, but not on PRL secretion, is age-related. Thus, TGF-beta 1 may play an important role in regulating lactotrope function during aging.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.