Amyloids are self-assembled protein architectures implicated in dozens of misfolding diseases. These assemblies appear to emerge through a "selection" of specific conformational "strains" which nucleate and propagate within cells to cause disease. The short Abeta(16-22) peptide, which includes the central core of the Alzheimer's disease Abeta peptide, generates an amyloid fiber which is morphologically indistinguishable from the full-length peptide fiber, but it can also form other morphologies under distinct conditions. Here we combine spectroscopic and microscopy analyses that reveal the subtle atomic-level differences that dictate assembly of two conformationally pure Abeta(16-22) assemblies, amyloid fibers and nanotubes, and define the minimal repeating unit for each assembly.

No abstract

Amino acid cross-strand pairing interactions along a beta-sheet surface have been implicated in protein beta-structural assembly and stability, yet the relative contributions have been difficult to evaluate directly. Here we develop the central core sequence of the Abeta peptide associated with Alzheimer's disease, Abeta(16-22), as an experimental system for evaluating these interactions. The peptide allows for internal comparisons between electrostatic and steric interactions within the beta-sheet and an evaluation of these cross-strand pair contributions to beta-sheet registry. A morphological transition from fibers to hollow nanotubes arises from changes in beta-sheet surface complementarity and provides a convenient indicator of the beta-strand strand registry. The intrinsic beta-sequence and pair correlations are critical to regulate secondary assembly. These studies provide evidence for a critical desolvation step that is not present in most models of the nucleation-dependent pathway for amyloid assembly.

The interface between bulk water and bulk hexane solutions of n-alkanols (H(CH(2))(m)OH, where m=20, 22, 24, or 30) is studied with x-ray reflectivity, x-ray off-specular diffuse scattering, and interfacial tension measurements. The alkanols adsorb to the interface to form a monolayer. The highest density, lowest temperature monolayers contain alkanol molecules with progressive disordering of the chain from the -CH(2)OH to the -CH(3) group. In the terminal half of the chain that includes the -CH(3) group the chain density is similar to that observed in bulk liquid alkanes just above their freezing temperature. The density in the alkanol headgroup region is 10% greater than either bulk water or the ordered headgroup region found in alkanol monolayers at the water-vapor interface. We conjecture that this higher density is a result of water penetration into the headgroup region of the disordered monolayer. A ratio of 1:3 water to alkanol molecules is consistent with our data. We also place an upper limit of one hexane to five or six alkanol molecules mixed into the alkyl chain region of the monolayer. In contrast, H(CH(2))(30)OH at the water-vapor interface forms a close-packed, ordered phase of nearly rigid rods. Interfacial tension measurements as a function of temperature reveal a phase transition at the water-hexane interface with a significant change in interfacial excess entropy. This transition is between a low temperature interface that is nearly fully covered with alkanols to a higher temperature interface with a much lower density of alkanols. The transition for the shorter alkanols appears to be first order whereas the transition for the longer alkanols appears to be weakly first order or second order. The x-ray data are consistent with the presence of monolayer domains at the interface and determine the domain coverage (fraction of interface covered by alkanol domains) as a function of temperature. This temperature dependence is consistent with a theoretical model for a second order phase transition that accounts for the domain stabilization as a balance between line tension and long range dipole forces. Several aspects of our measurements indicate that the presence of domains represents the appearance of a spatially inhomogeneous phase rather than the coexistence of two homogeneous phases.