Artikel ini menitikberatkan pada pemahaman dua organisasi Islam terbesar di Indonesia yakni Muhammadiyah dan Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) mengenai toleransi terhadap non-muslim, sebagai salah satu isu utama dalam gerakan radikalisme. Isu toleransi terhadap non-muslim seringkali menjadi pemantik tindak kekerasan, ketidakadilan, bahkan diskriminasi karena adanya pemahaman yang tidak kontekstual terhadap teks-teks (ayat) kitab suci yang berkaitan dengan hubungan muslim dengan non-muslim. Di sini pemahaman terhadap teks menjadi kunci, maka kajian ini menggunakan teori Interpretasi Paul Ricoeur yang memfokuskan pada penafsiran berdasarkan penjarakan (distansiasi) teks dengan pembaca. Adapun metode analisis yang digunakan adalah metode hermeneutika Ricoeur yang menitikberatkan pada distansiasi bahasa, diskursus, dan tekstualitas. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman Muhammadiyah dan NU mengenai toleransi terhadap non-muslim didasarkan pada surat al Hujurat ayat 13. Muhammadiyah memahami toleransi terhadap non-muslim sebagai sebagai ukhuwah insaniyah yang didasarkan atas nilai-nilai kemanusiaan universal, sedangkan NU memahami toleransi terhadap non-muslim sebagai ukhuwah wathaniyah dalam konteks berbangsa dan bernegara. Pemahaman yang moderat mengenai toleransi terhadap non-muslim dari kedua ormas Islam tersebut dapat dijadikan kontra-diskursus atas pemahaman tentang isu toleransi terhadap nonmuslim yang selama ini dapat memicu tindakan tidak adil dan diskriminatif.

This study focus on the process of understanding how Muhammadiyah is interpreted as Islamic organisation and Pancasila is as the ideology. The understanding toward Pancasila as the ideology is important because the Khalifah ideology appear to replace Pancasila. Furthermore, the drawback of globalisation which bring neoliberalism issue into society weaken the principles of Pancasila. In addition, destructive cult appears to claim that their movement/ organisation apply the most the principles of pancasila.  This study aims to investigate the strategies used by Muhammadiyah in implementing the five principle of pancasila ad the ideology. This study used hermeneutika Paul Ricoeur methodology which emphasis on the interpretation on distantiation between text and reader. The findings mentioned that the understanding about Pancasila is rely in al-Qur'an's Saba verse 15 "baldatun thayyibatun wa rabbun ghafur", (a good country is in Allah's forgiveness). In discourse analysis, this verse is interpreted by Muhammadiyah that Indonesia is a country which is used pancasila as the ideology. They believe that Indonesia is darul ahdi wa syahadah then this belief become cons discourse to against some movements to establish Khalifah Ideology.

This study focuses on the discourse about the meaning of Jihad that emerged in the Muhammadiyah circle as one of the Islamic Organizations in Indonesia. The discussion of meaning of Jihad as a way of peace or a way of war becomes crucial amid radicalism, terrorism, violence movements and chaos waged on behalf of religion. However, Muhammadiyah believes that the meaning of Jihad is anti-war and anti-violence which strengthens the understanding of Islam as the religion of rahmatan lil alamin (a mercy to all creation). This belief is criticism and contra-discourse towards camps that perceive Jihad as war and acts of violence. This study uses Paul Ricoeur's Interpretation Theory and focuses on the interpretation of the text based on the distinction between the text and the reader. The method is Ricoeur's hermeneutic method which focuses on the distortion of language, discourse, and textuality. The study shows that textually the meaning of Jihad among the Muhammadiyah circle is jihad lil-muwajahah, or the struggle to tackle a challenge by creating a superior movement, for example, "Jihad Konstitusi." Muhammadiyah's understanding of the meaning of Jihad can be used as a counter-discourse on the meaning of Jihad which well known as an act of terrorism.

Kajian ini memfokuskan kajiannya mengenai diskursus bentuk negara sebagai salah satu isu yang memicu gerakan radikalisme di kalangan organisasi masyarakat (Ormas) Islam (Muhammadiyah dan Nahdlatul Ulama). Asumsinya, munculnya gerakan-gerakan radikal di dunia dewasa ini sangat dipengaruhi oleh pemahaman umat Islam mengenai ayat-ayat yang berkaitan dengan bentuk negara. Kajian ini menggunakan metode hermeneutika Ricour yang menekankan pada otonomi teks yang berkaitan dengan keputusan dan pernyataan resmi kedua Ormas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, berdasarkan analisis teks yang menggunakan hermeneutika Ricoeur, bahwa pemahaman ormas Islam mengenai bentuk negara, di mana Muhammadiyah memandang negara Pancasila sebagai ahlul ahdi wa syahada. Sedangkan NU memandang bentuk negara sebagai konsep bersama dalam hidup bernegara.

This article focuses on the process of interpreting the meaning of jihad in moderate Islamic organizations as a counter-discourse of radicalism in Indonesia. In the discourse on the meaning of jihad in Indonesia, many Muslim groups further accentuate the interpretation of the meaning of jihad as war or other acts of violence. As a result, there have been many acts of violence taking place such as attacks and bombings against non-Muslims in the name of jihad. The misinterpretation of the meaning of jihad must be countered by giving rise to other meanings of jihad as counter-discourses. One of them is proposed by a moderate Islamic organization in Indonesia, Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), which interprets the meaning of jihad more contextually and in accordance with the values of Islamic teachings as a religion which upholds the value of rahmatan lil-alamin. The research method used was the analysis of Paul Ricoeur's hermeneutics which emphasized the distinction of the interpretation process. The research finds that the interpretation of the meaning of jihad among NU is jihad as "Mabadi' Khaira Ummah" (prioritizing people's welfare). This interpretation is a reflection of the NU as an organization that is based on people's welfare and integrity of the nation. Contextually, this interpretation is manifested in the form of jihad against corruption, against drugs and jihad in social media. The implication of interpretation of the meaning of jihad as "Mabadi' Khaira Ummah" is strengthening NU's position as a moderate Islamic organization, and also as a counterdiscourse on the interpretation of the meaning of jihad as war and terrorism that is often interpreted by radical muslim groups in Indonesia.