Background Early initiation of breastfeeding after birth and exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months improves child survival, nutrition and health outcomes. However, only 42% of newborns worldwide are breastfed within the first hour of life. Small and sick newborns are at greater risk of not receiving breastmilk and often require additional support for feeding. This study compares breastfeeding practices in Rwandan neonatal care units (NCUs) before and after the implementation of a package of interventions aimed to improve breastfeeding. Methods This pre-post intervention study was conducted at two district hospital NCUs in rural Rwanda from October–December 2017 (pre-intervention) and September 2018–March 2019 (post-intervention). Only newborns admitted before their second day of life (DOL) were included. Data were extracted from patient charts for clinical and demographic characteristics, feeding, and patient outcomes. Exclusive breastfeeding at discharge was based on last recorded infant feeding on the day of discharge. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding at discharge. Results Pre-intervention, 255 newborns were admitted in the NCUs and 793 were admitted in post-intervention. Exclusive breastfeeding on the day of birth (DOL0) increased from 5.4% (12/255) to 35.9% (249/793). At discharge, exclusive breastfeeding increased from 69.6% (149/214) to 87.0% (618/710). The mortality rate decreased from 16.1% (41/255) to 10.5% (83/793). Factors associated with greater odds of exclusive breastfeeding at discharge included admission during the post-intervention period (aOR 4.91; 95% CI 1.99, 12.11), and admission for infection (aOR 2.99; 95% CI 1.13, 7.93). Home deliveries (aOR 0.15; 95% CI 0.05, 0.47), preterm delivery (aOR 0.36; 95% CI 0.15, 0.87) and delayed first breastmilk feed (aOR 0.04 for DOL3 vs. DOL0; 95% CI 0.01, 0.35) reduced odds of exclusive breastfeeding at discharge. Conclusions Expansion and adoption of evidenced-based guidelines, using innovative approaches, aimed at the unique needs of small and sick newborns may help to improve earlier initiation of breastfeeding, decrease mortality, and improve exclusive breastfeeding on discharge from hospital among small and sick newborns. These interventions should be replicated in similar settings to determine their effectiveness.

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) misinformation and inadequate access to hygiene and sanitation amenities could hamper efforts to contain COVID-19 spread in resource-limited settings. In this study, we describe knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms and preventive measures, sources of information, and access to adequate handwashing among patients with chronic diseases in three Rwandan rural districts during the onset of COVID-19 in Rwanda. Methods This was a cross-sectional survey conducted among patients who were enrolled in the HIV/AIDS, non-communicable diseases, mental health, oncology, and pediatric development programs at health facilities in Kayonza, Kirehe and Burera districts. The study sample was randomly selected and stratified by district and clinical program. Telephone-based data collection occurred between 23 April and 11 May 2020. Primary caregivers responded to the survey when the selected patient was a child under age 18 or severely ill. We defined good knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms and preventive measures as knowing that a dry cough and fever were common symptoms and social distancing or staying home and regular handwashing could prevent COVID-19 infection. Access to adequate handwashing was defined as living in a household with a handwashing station and regular access to clean water and soap. We used Fisher’s exact tests and logistic regression to measure associations between the source of information and good knowledge about COVID-19 and between socio-economic characteristics and access to adequate handwashing. Results In total, 150 patients and 70 caregivers responded to the survey. Forty-eight (22.3%) respondents had no formal education. Sources of COVID-19 information included mass media (86.8%), local government leaders (27.3%), healthcare workers (15.9%) and social media (6.8%). Twenty-seven percent (n=59) of respondents had good knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms and preventive measures. In the adjusted analysis, getting information from news media was associated with having good knowledge about COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio, aOR: 5.46; 95% CI: 1.43-20.75]. Seventy-nine (35.9%) respondents reported access to adequate handwashing at home, with access varying significantly by the district in favour of Kayonza (61.3%). Conclusions COVID-19-related knowledge and access to adequate handwashing were low among patients with chronic diseases at the beginning of the pandemic in Rwanda. Efforts to mitigate COVID-19 spread among chronic care populations may include investment in targeted COVID-19-related education and access to adequate handwashing.

Background Women who deliver via cesarean section (c-section) experience short- and long-term complications that may affect their physical health and their ability to function normally. While physical health outcomes are routinely assessed and monitored, postpartum functional outcomes are not well understood from a patient’s perspective or characterized by clinicians. In Rwanda, 11% of rural women deliver via c-section. This study explores the functional recovery of rural Rwandan women after c-section and assesses factors that predict poor functionality at postoperative day (POD) 30. Methods Data were collected prospectively on POD 3, 11, and 30 from women delivering at Kirehe District Hospital between October 2019 and March 2020. Functionality was measured by self-reported overall health, energy level, mobility, self-care ability, and ability to perform usual activities. We computed composite mean scores with a maximum score of 4.0 and scores ≤ 2.0 reflected poor functionality. We assessed functionality with descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Results Of 617 patients, 54.0%, 25.9%, and 26.8% reported poor functional status at POD3, POD11, and POD30, respectively. At POD30, the most self-reported poor functionality dimensions were poor or very poor overall health (48.1%), and inability to perform usual activities (15.6%). In the adjusted model, women whose surgery lasted 30–45 minutes had higher odds of poor functionality (aOR = 1.85, p = 0.01), as did women who experienced intraoperative complications (aOR = 4.12, p = 0.037). High income patients had incrementally lower significant odds of poor functionality (aOR = 0.62 for every US$100 increase in monthly income, p = 0.04). Conclusion We found a high proportion of poor functionality 30 days post-c-section and while surgery lasting > 30 minutes and experiencing intra-operative complications was associated with poor functionality, a reported higher income status was associated with lower odds of poor functionality. Functional status assessments, monitoring and support should be included in post-partum care for women who delivered via c-section. Effective risk mitigating intervention should be implemented to recover functionality after c-section, particularly among low-income women and those undergoing longer surgical procedures or those with intraoperative complications.

RESULTS:Of 59,964 included patients (median age 69 years; 43.2% female; 75.8% colorectal resections), 18.0% received perioperative RBC transfusions. Funnel plots showed variation in transfusion use among surgeons and hospitals. Patient characteristics, such as age, comorbidity, and procedure type, explained 12.8% of the variation. After adjusting for case-mix, systematic between-surgeon and between-hospital differences were responsible for 2.8% and 2.1% of the variation, respectively. This translated to an approximately 30% difference in the odds of transfusion for two similar patients treated by distinct surgeons (MOR 1.35,) and hospitals (MOR: 1.30, 95%CI 1.23-1.42). We observed comparable effects across procedure-type subgroups.CONCLUSION: Transfusion provision depends on patient factors. Yet, the impact of the treating surgeon and hospital on variation relative to other factors is important and reflects opportunities to target modifiable processes of care to standardize perioperative RBC transfusion practice.