No abstract

OBJECTIVES Current guidelines recommend prophylactic replacement of the ascending aorta at an aneurysmal diameter of >55 mm to prevent acute Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) in non-Marfan patients. Several publications have challenged this threshold, suggesting that surgery should be performed in smaller aneurysms to prevent this devastating disease. We reviewed our experience with measuring aortic size at the time of TAAD to validate the existing recommendation for prophylactic ascending aorta replacement. METHODS All patients who had been admitted for TAAD to our emergency department from 2014 to 2019 and underwent ascending aorta replacement were included. Marfan patients were excluded. The maximum diameter of the dissected aorta was measured preoperatively using CT scan. We estimated the aortic diameter at the time of dissection to be 7 mm smaller than the measured maximum diameter of the dissected aorta (modelled pre-dissection diameter). RESULTS Overall, 102 patients were included. Of these, 67 were male (65.6%) and 35 were female (34.4%), and the cohort’s mean age was 65 ± 12.1 years. In addition, 66% were treated for arterial hypertension. The mean maximum modelled pre-dissection diameter was 39.6 ± 4.8 mm: 39.1 ± 5.1 mm in men and 40.7 ± 2.8 mm in women (P = 0.1). The cumulative 30-day mortality rate was 19.6% (20/102). CONCLUSIONS TAAD occurred at a modelled aortic diameter below 45 mm in 87.7% of our patients. Therefore, the current aortic diameter threshold of 55 mm excludes ∼99% of patients with TAAD from prophylactic replacement of the ascending aorta. The maximum diameter of the ascending aorta warrants reappraisal and this parameter should be a distinct part of a personalized decision-making process that also takes into account age, gender and body surface area to establish the surgical indication for preventive aorta replacement aimed to improve the survival benefit of this procedure.

Objectives To quantitatively evaluate the impact of virtual monochromatic images (VMI) on reduced-iodine-dose dual-energy coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in terms of coronary lumen segmentation in vitro, and secondly to assess the image quality in vivo, compared with conventional CT obtained with regular iodine dose. Materials and methods A phantom simulating regular and reduced iodine injection was used to determine the accuracy and precision of lumen area segmentation for various VMI energy levels. We retrospectively included 203 patients from December 2017 to August 2018 (mean age, 51.7 ± 16.8 years) who underwent CCTA using either standard (group A, n = 103) or reduced (group B, n = 100) iodine doses. Conventional images (group A) were qualitatively and quantitatively compared with 55-keV VMI (group B). We recorded the location of venous catheters. Results In vitro, VMI outperformed conventional CT, with a segmentation accuracy of 0.998 vs. 1.684 mm2, respectively (p < 0.001), and a precision of 0.982 vs. 1.229 mm2, respectively (p < 0.001), in simulated overweight adult subjects. In vivo, the rate of diagnostic CCTA in groups A and B was 88.4% (n = 91/103) vs. 89% (n = 89/100), respectively, and noninferiority of protocol B was inferred. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) of lumen versus fat and muscle were higher in group B (p < 0.001) and comparable for lumen versus calcium (p = 0.423). Venous catheters were more often placed on the forearm or hand in group B (p < 0.001). Conclusion In vitro, low-keV VMI improve vessel area segmentation. In vivo, low-keV VMI allows for a 40% iodine dose and injection rate reduction while maintaining diagnostic image quality and improves the CNR between lumen versus fat and muscle. Key Points • Dual-energy coronary CT angiography is becoming increasingly available and might help improve patient management. • Compared with regular-iodine-dose coronary CT angiography, reduced-iodine-dose dual-energy CT with low-keV monochromatic image reconstructions performed better in phantom-based vessel cross-sectional segmentation and proved to be noninferior in vivo. • Patients receiving reduced-iodine-dose dual-energy coronary CT angiography often had the venous catheter placed on the forearm or wrist without compromising image quality.

No abstract