BackgroundManagement of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has been difficult using standard therapy (radiation with temozolomide chemotherapy). The ketogenic diet is used commonly to treat refractory epilepsy in children and, when administered in restricted amounts, can also target energy metabolism in brain tumors. We report the case of a 65-year-old woman who presented with progressive memory loss, chronic headaches, nausea, and a right hemisphere multi-centric tumor seen with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Following incomplete surgical resection, the patient was diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme expressing hypermethylation of the MGMT gene promoter.MethodsPrior to initiation of the standard therapy, the patient conducted water-only therapeutic fasting and a restricted 4:1 (fat: carbohydrate + protein) ketogenic diet that delivered about 600 kcal/day. The patient also received the restricted ketogenic diet concomitantly during the standard treatment period. The diet was supplemented with vitamins and minerals. Steroid medication (dexamethasone) was removed during the course of the treatment. The patient was followed using MRI and positron emission tomography with fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG-PET).ResultsAfter two months treatment, the patient's body weight was reduced by about 20% and no discernable brain tumor tissue was detected using either FDG-PET or MRI imaging. Biomarker changes showed reduced levels of blood glucose and elevated levels of urinary ketones. MRI evidence of tumor recurrence was found 10 weeks after suspension of strict diet therapy.ConclusionThis is the first report of confirmed GBM treated with standard therapy together with a restricted ketogenic diet. As rapid regression of GBM is rare in older patients following incomplete surgical resection and standard therapy alone, the response observed in this case could result in part from the action of the calorie restricted ketogenic diet. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of restricted ketogenic diets, administered alone or together with standard treatment, as a therapy for GBM and possibly other malignant brain tumors.

Baseline CT scans of 116 patients (48% female, median 64 years) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) were retrospectively reviewed to investigate the prognostic role of sarcopenia and fat compartment distributions on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and early therapy termination. Skeletal muscle index (SMI), skeletal muscle density (SMD), and intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) were quantified at the level of the third lumbar vertebra (L3) and proximal thigh (PT). Low L3-SMD, but not low L3-SMI, was associated with early therapy termination (p = 0.028), shorter OS (HR = 6.29; 95% CI = 2.17–18.26; p < 0.001), and shorter PFS (HR = 2.42; 95% CI = 1.26–4.65; p = 0.008). After correction for sex, International Prognostic Index (IPI), BMI, and R-CHOP therapy (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone), low L3-SMD remained associated with poor OS (HR = 3.54; 95% CI = 1.10–11.40; p = 0.034) but not with PFS. Increased PT-IMAT was prognostic for poor OS and PFS after correction for sex, IPI, BMI, and R-CHOP therapy (HR = 1.35; CI = 1.03–1.7; p = 0.03, and HR = 1.30; CI = 1.04–1.64; p = 0.024, respectively). Reduced muscle quality (SMD) and increased intermuscular fat (IMAT), rather than low muscle quantity (SMI), are associated with poor prognosis in DLBCL, when measured at the L3 level, and particularly at the level of the proximal thigh. The proximal thigh represents a novel radiological landmark to study body composition.

Background: Bortezomib (VELCADE®, Vel) and lenalidomide (Revlimid®, Rev) are both highly effective agents in multiple myeloma (MM). Preclinical studies show Rev sensitizes MM cells to Vel and dexamethasone (Dex), suggesting combination therapy may enhance clinical activity. This phase 1 dose-escalation study aimed to determine MTD and activity of Rev-Vel +/− Dex combination therapy in patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory MM. Methods: Eight cohorts (≥3 pts each) were planned, with dosing of Vel 1.0 or 1.3mg/m2 (d 1, 4, 8, 11) and Rev 5, 10, 15, or 20mg (d 1–14), in 21-d cycles. Dex 40mg (on day of and day after each Vel dose) could be added in pts with PD. NCI CTCAE v3.0 was used for toxicity assessment; DLT was defined as any grade (G) ≥3 non-hematologic toxicity, G4 neutropenia for ≥5 d and/or neutropenic fever, or platelets <10,000/mm3 on >1 occasion despite transfusion. Response was assessed by modified EBMT criteria. Results: 28 pts were enrolled in cohorts 1–6 (Rev 5–15mg, Vel 1.0–1.3mg/m2) plus 10 additional pts at the MTD (Dose Level 5), including 12 with relapsed and 26 with relapsed and refractory MM (n=38). Among 25 men and 13 women, median age was 60yrs (range: 37–79), and median no. of prior therapies was 5 (range: 1–13), including 23 pts with prior SCT, 23 with prior Vel, 6 with prior Rev, and 36 with prior thalidomide (Thal). One DLT was observed in cohort 4 (Rev 10mg–Vel 1.3mg/m2; transient G3 hyponatremia). DLT was reached in cohort 6 (Rev 15mg–Vel 1.3mg/m2) with 1 episode of G3 HZV reactivation (successfully treated with acyclovir) and 1 G4 neutropenia (reversed with GCSF support and dose reduction). MTD was therefore declared at Rev 15mg–Vel 1.0mg/m2. In total, 5 pts had dose reductions for Vel, 6 pts for Rev, and 5 pts for both Rev and Vel. No significant (G≥3) fatigue or peripheral neuropathy has been seen. No anticoagulant prophylaxis was required and only 1 pt had DVT while on Rev alone. In 36 evaluable pts, the overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) is 58% (90% CI: 46%, 75%), including 6% CR/nCR (Table) after a median of 6 cycles (range: 4–17). Responses were durable (median 6 months, range: 1–26), and 11 pts remain on therapy beyond 1 year. Dex has been added in 14 pts with PD, resulting in PR/MR/SD in 10 (71%), with just 1 pt experiencing Dex-related G2 diarrhea and fatigue, which prompted discontinuation of therapy. Conclusions: Rev-Vel +/− Dex is well tolerated and very active with durable responses seen in pts with heavily pretreated relapsed and/or refractory MM, including pts who have had prior Rev, Vel, Thal and SCT. An MTD of Rev 15mg–Vel 1.0mg/m2 has been defined, with Phase 2 studies now ongoing in both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory MM. Best responses by Rev-Vel cohort (EBMT criteria) Cohort Rev-Vel dose Vel 1.0mg/m2 Vel 1.3mg/m2 1–2 Rev 5mg 2PR, 1MR 1CR, 2PR 3–4 Rev 10mg 1nCR, 2PR 2PR, 2MR, 1SD, 1PD 5–6 Rev 15mg 2PR, 4MR, 7SD, 1PD 2 PR, 5SD

It is unclear whether weight loss (WL) achieved by means of lifestyle interventions (LSIs) before bariatric surgery (BS) can improve long-term WL outcomes after surgery. We aimed to assess the impact of a structured LSI on WL% after gastric bypass (GBP). Two groups of patients were selected from a large cohort of participants with obesity who underwent GBP surgery at Santa Maria Nuova Hospital (Reggio Emilia, Italy). The groups were categorized as those who have or have not received LSI prior to GBP. The LSI group included 91 participants (cases) compared to 123 participants (controls) in the non-LSI group. WL% was measured at follow-up times of 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. The LSI group achieved a clinically significant WL% (−7.5%) before BS, and at the time of surgery, the two groups had similar body weights and demographic statuses. At all points, until the 24-month follow-up, the two groups displayed similar WLs%. With regard to the longer follow-ups, the LSI group maintained weight loss until the last timepoint (60 months), whereas the non-LSI group experienced weight regain at 36, 48, and 60 months. In a real-world context, a structured behavioral LSI prior to GBP seems to prevent longer-term weight regain.