Western military professionalism and civil-military relations are based on the implicit concept that the military institution is separate from society and is apolitical. There is a great deal of evidence to suggest that such a concept is not only historically unsound but unrealistic in the modern era. The nature of modern conflicts and the nature of liberal democratic systems have obscured, and in many instances eliminated, delineations between the military and society. Consequently, there is a need to redefine military professionalism, based on a new perspective of civil-military relations. The traditional ideal has presumed civilian control and supremacy over the military. In reality however, civil-military relations are based on a variety of informal and formal links between military professionals and civilian elite, and involve a great deal of political activity.Therefore, a more realistic model is one of equilibrium. Such a model is relevant to modern security requirements and fosters a military professionalism whose dimension includes political-social ingredients and a recognition that most contingencies and relationships are rooted in political-military as well as social considerations.-------.--Military traditions die hard. Nowhere is this more true than in Western industrial societies, where military professionalism and the concept of civil-military relations remain fixed in nineteenth-century notions. It is assumed that the military in Western industrial systems is apolitical and that civil-military relations are characterized by civilian control and supremacy. While there is a degree of difference in the way these are presumed to operate within each state, the basic views remain the same.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. African Studies Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to African Studies Review.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.