2006
DOI: 10.4324/9780203004722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The US Military Profession into the 21st Century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As Feaver and Kohn implied, declining tolerance for sacrifice negatively affects military–civilian relations. Disputes then prompt the military to raise its voice in the political arena (as recommended by Sarkesian and Connor 2006), or at least to pursue other options to enhance its professional autonomy vis‐à‐vis the politicians, as the IDF did with the installation of counterfire methods. Simply put, by including casualty sensitivity as a factor, Desch’s matrix of threats is enhanced with additional variations on civilian‐military relations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Feaver and Kohn implied, declining tolerance for sacrifice negatively affects military–civilian relations. Disputes then prompt the military to raise its voice in the political arena (as recommended by Sarkesian and Connor 2006), or at least to pursue other options to enhance its professional autonomy vis‐à‐vis the politicians, as the IDF did with the installation of counterfire methods. Simply put, by including casualty sensitivity as a factor, Desch’s matrix of threats is enhanced with additional variations on civilian‐military relations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Military professionalism occurs when the military subordinates itself to civilian politics (Huntington, 1957). Under such circumstances, the military is apolitical, obedient, and trusted by national politicians (Kohn, 2009; Moskos et al, 2000; Sarkesian and Conor, 2006). However, military professionalism is a Western-centric concept.…”
Section: The Military and Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The active involvement of the military in politics is neither unique to Africa nor a new phenomenon in Zimbabwe. Early scholars such as Huntington (1957) argue that if military professionalism is to be achieved, the military has to subordinate itself to civilian politics, a practice that he calls “objective civilian control.” Features of military professionalism include integrity, competence, obedience, honor, and trustworthiness (Kohn 2009; Sarkesian & Conor 2006; Moskos et al 2000). However, military professionalism is a broad concept, often difficult to define both in theory and practice.…”
Section: Politicized Armies: Africa and Beyondmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, military professionalism is a broad concept, often difficult to define both in theory and practice. For Sarkesian and Conor (2006), military professionalism is characterized by at least two tiers: on the one hand, the relationship between the military and national leadership, and on the other, practices within the military itself. This article examines both tiers, especially the ways in which the former affects the latter.…”
Section: Politicized Armies: Africa and Beyondmentioning
confidence: 99%