We studied a group of 247 patients out of 7725 patients who had an ultrasonic examination between 32 and 36 weeks gestation and were found to have oligohydramnios (amniotic fluid volume (AFV) less than or equal to 2.0 cm). We compared the features of labor and mode of delivery and perinatal outcome in this group with that of a normal control group of 247 patients who also had an ultrasonic examination between 32 and 36 weeks gestation and were found to have normal AFV (greater than 2.0 to less than 8.0 cm). The incidence of induction of labor, of elective cesarean section, of preterm delivery (less than 37 weeks' gestation) was significantly higher in the oligohydramnios group (study group) as compared with the incidence in the control group (P less than 0.05). The incidence of fetal distress in antenatal and intrapartum period, pH (less than or equal to 7.2), of low Apgar score (0-5), of intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) (less than tenth centile) infants, of major fetal anomaly and perinatal mortality rate (PNMR) are significantly higher in the oligohydramnios group as compared with the incidence and PNMR in the normal control group (P less than 0.05). The ultrasonic finding of oligohydramnios should alert the clinician regarding the possibility of problems in labor and perinatal period.
We studied a group of 135 patients with polyhydramnios diagnosed on the basis of ultrasonic findings (greatest vertical diameter of the liquor column greater than or equal to 8.0 cm) between 32 and 36 weeks gestation (study group). We compared the obstetric characteristics and perinatal outcome of the study group with a similar number who constituted our control group. The incidence of women aged 20 years or less was higher in the study group (8.9%) compared with 4.5% in the control group. Of the 135 patients who were diagnosed to have polyhydramnios ultrasonically, the clinical diagnoses prior to referral for ultrasonic scanning, were, suspected large for date fetuses in 34 patients (25.2%), clinically suspected polyhydramnios in 28 (20.7%), gestational diabetes in 21 (15.6%) and insulin dependent diabetes in 6 (4.4%) compared with 13.3%, 5.2%, 3.0% and 0.7%, respectively in the control group (P less than 0.05). Preterm delivery occurred in 11.1% in the study group compared with the incidence of 6.7% in the control group. The incidence of fetal distress, low Apgar Score, macrosomic infants, major fetal anomalies, gross and corrected perinatal mortality rate and admission to special/intensive care nursery was significantly higher in the study group compared with that of the control (P less than 0.01). We found ultrasonic examination is a reliable technique to assess the amount of amniotic fluid volume and it alerts the clinician to possible future problems in pregnancy, labor and neonatal period.
Objective: To describe a process of meaningful Aboriginal community engagement that repositioned and valued community members’ knowledge(s) and lived experiences while strengthening relationships, research processes and outcomes. Background: Aboriginal Australians have the oldest continuous culture in the world, yet due to effects of colonisation, experience some of the world's poorest health outcomes. The AKction [Aboriginal Kidney Care Together – Improving Outcomes Now] project brought together Aboriginal people with lived experience of kidney disease, clinicians and researchers to improve kidney care. Methodology: Using Aboriginal methodologies of Ganma and Dadirri within community‐based participatory action research (cb‐PAR), a core advisory group of Aboriginal people with lived experiences of kidney disease worked closely with clinicians and researchers. Results: Three community consultation workshops that deeply valued Aboriginal knowledge(s) were co‐created. Community members formed a reference group, established partnerships and influenced health research, policy and service provision. Non‐Indigenous researchers engaged in critical self‐reflection and levelling of Western‐Aboriginal and clinician‐consumer power imbalances. Conclusions: Deeply respectful community engagement is possible through co‐creation and cb‐PAR. It results in multiple positive impacts and beneficial relationships between community members, clinicians and academics. Implications for public health: Meaningful consultation with Aboriginal communities guides culturally safe research processes, health policy and service delivery.
Objective: To describe the experiences, perceptions and suggested improvements in healthcare identified by Aboriginal patients, families and community members living with kidney disease in South Australia. Methods: Community consultations were held in an urban, rural and remote location in 2019 by the Aboriginal Kidney Care Together – Improving Outcomes Now (AKction) project and Kidney Health Australia. Consultations were co‐designed with community members, using participatory action research, Yarning, Dadirri and Ganma Indigenous Methodologies. Key themes were synthesised, verified by community members and shared through formal and community reports and media. Results: Aboriginal participants identified the importance of: family and community and maintaining their wellbeing, strength and resilience; the need for prevention and early detection that is localised, engages whole families and prevents diagnosis shock; better access to quality care that ensures Aboriginal people can make informed choices and decisions about their options for dialysis and transplantation, and; more Aboriginal health professionals and peer navigators, and increased responsiveness and provision of cultural safety care by all kidney health professionals. Conclusion: Aboriginal community members have strong and clear recommendations for improving the quality and responsiveness of health care generally, and kidney care specifically. Implications for public health: Aboriginal people with lived experience of chronic conditions wish to significantly inform the way care is organised and delivered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.