Several studies have made strong efforts to understand how age and parity modulate the risk of breast cancer. A holistic understanding of the dynamic regulation of the morphological, cellular, and molecular milieu of the mammary gland offers insights into the drivers of breast cancer development as well as into potential prophylactic interventions, the latter being a longstanding ambition of the research and clinical community aspiring to eradicate the disease. In this review we discuss mechanisms that react to pregnancy signals, and we delineate the nuances of pregnancyassociated dynamism that contribute towards either breast cancer development or prevention. Further definition of the molecular basis of parity and breast cancer risk may allow the elaboration of tools to predict and survey those who are at risk of breast cancer development. Parity: A Perspective for Therapeutic and Prophylactic InterventionBreast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignance in women. It strikes >1.6 million women worldwide, and about one in eight 8 women in the USA will develop breast cancer in their lifetime (Box 1 and Table 1). Most breast cancers arise because of dysfunction of cells in mammary ducts (50-70% of tumors) or lobules (10-15% of breast cancers), which categorizes these tumors as carcinomas, specifically adenocarcinomas. Some breast tumors are sarcomas, originating in the stroma or muscle. Other types and subtypes of breast cancer are less frequent, and a single diagnosis of breast cancer may refer to a combination of different tumors (www.breastcancer.org) (Box 1).Parity is known to have a dual effect on breast cancer risk. In many ways, breast tumorigenesis mimics several mechanisms that are commonly activated during pregnancy, including augmented cell proliferation, alterations in cell shedding, reduced cell apoptosis, altered gene expression, and extracellular matrix (ECM) modifications. On the other hand, epidemiological studies have provided evidence of the cancer-preventive benefits of pregnancy wherein an early age of pregnancy decreases the risk of breast cancer development. Although understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying these phenomena is still in its infancy, their elucidation will open new avenues to target breast cancer. Mammary Gland Composition and DevelopmentThe mammary gland is a complex and highly adaptive organ whose main function, in female mammals, is to produce milk during lactation for the sustenance of young offspring. The gland is composed of a variety of cell types, including fibroblasts, adipocytes, epithelial, endothelial, and immune cells. The epithelial cells can be further subdivided into multiple cell types that, together, form the branching structure of the gland and constitute the secretory alveoli during lactation. Two main epithelial cell compartments can be distinguished in the mammary gland: the luminal compartment [the inner cell layer, localized between the lumen (see Glossary),and the basal compartment] and the basal compartment (the outer layer surrounding ...
Pregnancy causes a series of cellular and molecular changes in mammary epithelial cells (MECs) of female adults. In addition, pregnancy can also modify the predisposition of rodent and human MECs to initiate oncogenesis. Here, we investigate how pregnancy reprograms enhancer chromatin in the mammary epithelium of mice and influences the transcriptional output of the oncogenic transcription factor cMYC. We find that pregnancy induces an expansion of the active cis-regulatory landscape of MECs, which influences the activation of pregnancy-related programs during re-exposure to pregnancy hormones in vivo and in vitro. Using inducible cMYC overexpression, we demonstrate that post-pregnancy MECs are resistant to the downstream molecular programs induced by cMYC, a response that blunts carcinoma initiation, but does not perturb the normal pregnancy-induced epigenomic landscape. cMYC overexpression drives post-pregnancy MECs into a senescence-like state, and perturbations of this state increase malignant phenotypic changes. Taken together, our findings provide further insight into the cell-autonomous signals in post-pregnancy MECs that underpin the regulation of gene expression, cellular activation, and resistance to malignant development.
The developing mammary gland depends on several transcription-dependent networks to define cellular identities and differentiation trajectories. Recent technological advancements that allow for single-cell profiling of gene expression have provided an initial picture into the epithelial cellular heterogeneity across the diverse stages of gland maturation. Still, a deeper dive into expanded molecular signatures would improve our understanding of the diversity of mammary epithelial and non-epithelial cellular populations across different tissue developmental stages, mouse strains and mammalian species. Here, we combined differential mammary gland fractionation approaches and transcriptional profiles obtained from FACS-isolated mammary cells to improve our definitions of mammary-resident, cellular identities at the single-cell level. Our approach yielded a series of expression signatures that illustrate the heterogeneity of mammary epithelial cells, specifically those of the luminal fate, and uncovered transcriptional changes to their lineage-defined, cellular states that are induced during gland development. Our analysis also provided molecular signatures that identified non-epithelial mammary cells, including adipocytes, fibroblasts and rare immune cells. Lastly, we extended our study to elucidate expression signatures of human, breast-resident cells, a strategy that allowed for the cross-species comparison of mammary epithelial identities. Collectively, our approach improved the existing signatures of normal mammary epithelial cells, as well as elucidated the diversity of non-epithelial cells in murine and human breast tissue. Our study provides a useful resource for future studies that use single-cell molecular profiling strategies to understand normal and malignant breast development.
Pregnancy reprograms mammary epithelial cells (MECs) to control their responses to pregnancy hormone re-exposure and carcinoma progression. However, the influence of pregnancy on the mammary microenvironment is less clear. Here, we used single-cell RNA sequencing to profile the composition of epithelial and non-epithelial cells in mammary tissue from nulliparous and parous female mice. Our analysis indicates an expansion of gd natural killer T-like immune cells (NKTs) following pregnancy and upregulation of immune signaling molecules in post-pregnancy MECs. We show that expansion of NKTs following pregnancy is due to elevated expression of the antigen-presenting molecule CD1d on MECs. Loss of CD1d expression on post-pregnancy MECs, or overall lack of activated NKTs, results in mammary oncogenesis. Collectively, our findings illustrate how pregnancy-induced changes modulate the communication between MECs and the immune microenvironment and establish a causal link between pregnancy, the immune microenvironment, and mammary oncogenesis.
17Pregnancy leaves a series of cellular and molecular modifications on mammary epithelial cells 18 (MECs). Pregnancy is also known for decreasing the predisposition of rodent and human MECs 19 to oncogenesis. Here, in order to understand the molecular basis for this effect, we analyzed 20 epigenetic changes in the enhancer landscape of murine post-pregnancy MECs, together with 21 their effect on gene regulation, tissue development and oncogenesis. Using in vivo and in vitro 22 analyses, we found that completion of a pregnancy cycle changed the dynamics of cellular 23 proliferation and gene expression in response to a second pregnancy. Our results also 24 demonstrated that post-pregnancy MECs are resistant to the initial molecular programs driven 25 by cMYC overexpression, a response that blocked MEC proliferation but did not perturb the 26 pregnancy-induced epigenomic landscape. Overall, our findings suggest that pregnancy-27 induced mammary cancer prevention involves the epigenomic changes in MECs brought about 28 by pregnancy. 29 30 89 This procedure induces mammary gland development that closely resembled both the 90 histological and epigenetic modifications observed in mice where pregnancy occurred following 91 conception [25] ( Supplementary Fig. 1a). 92Pre-and post-pregnancy MECs had similar transcription programs, as revealed by 93 unsupervised expression clustering, suggesting that their epithelial identity during tissue 94 4 homeostasis is not substantially altered by a previous pregnancy cycle. MECs harvested during 95 the early stages of a second pregnancy (D6) clustered together with those harvested at a later 96 time-point during a first pregnancy (D12), supporting that post-pregnancy MECs respond 97 robustly to consecutive pregnancy signals ( Fig.1a). In order to address whether this robust 98 response to second pregnancy signals have an epigenetic basis, we investigated the genomic 99 distribution of the active histone mark H3K27ac, which annotates active regulatory elements 100 (promoters and enhancers) in mammalian genomes, in the same cohort of MECs utilized for the 101 RNA-seq analysis ( Supplementary Fig. 1a). 102Post-pregnancy MECS exhibited an eight-fold increase in the number of exclusive H3K27ac 103 peaks (n=169,950), compared to pre-pregnancy MECs (n=20,741), demonstrating that 104 pregnancy significantly expands the regulatory landscape of MECs ( Fig. 1b). H3K27ac peaks in 105 pre-pregnancy MECs were enriched in pathways associated with kinase activity, RNA binding 106 and stem cells ( Supplementary Fig. 1b), while in post-pregnancy MECs, the H3K27ac peaks 107 enriched for pathways involved in regulation of cell polarity, mRNA splicing, DNA methylation 108 and response to stress ( Supplementary Fig. 1c). These observations show that pre- and post-109 pregnancy MECs engage in distinct cellular maintenance and tissue homeostasis pathways. 110Further investigation of the regulatory regions demarcated by the pregnancy-induced 111 epigenome demonstrated that the majority of H3K27ac pea...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.