No abstract

End-to-end spoken language understanding (SLU) models are a class of model architectures that predict semantics directly from speech. Because of their input and output types, we refer to them as speech-to-interpretation (STI) models. Previous works have successfully applied STI models to targeted use cases, such as recognizing home automation commands, however no study has yet addressed how these models generalize to broader use cases. In this work, we analyze the relationship between the performance of STI models and the difficulty of the use case to which they are applied. We introduce empirical measures of dataset semantic complexity to quantify the difficulty of the SLU tasks. We show that near-perfect performance metrics for STI models reported in the literature were obtained with datasets that have low semantic complexity values. We perform experiments where we vary the semantic complexity of a large, proprietary dataset and show that STI model performance correlates with our semantic complexity measures, such that performance increases as complexity values decrease. Our results show that it is important to contextualize an STI model's performance with the complexity values of its training dataset to reveal the scope of its applicability.

End-to-end (E2E) spoken language understanding (SLU) systems can infer the semantics of a spoken utterance directly from an audio signal. However, training an E2E system remains a challenge, largely due to the scarcity of paired audio-semantics data. In this paper, we treat an E2E system as a multi-modal model, with audio and text functioning as its two modalities, and use a cross-modal latent space (CMLS) architecture, where a shared latent space is learned between the 'acoustic' and 'text' embeddings. We propose using different multi-modal losses to explicitly guide the acoustic embeddings to be closer to the text embeddings, obtained from a semantically powerful pre-trained BERT model. We train the CMLS model on two publicly available E2E datasets, across different cross-modal losses and show that our proposed triplet loss function achieves the best performance. It achieves a relative improvement of 1.4% and 4% respectively over an E2E model without a cross-modal space and a relative improvement of 0.7% and 1% over a previously published CMLS model using L2 loss. The gains are higher for a smaller, more complicated E2E dataset, demonstrating the efficacy of using an efficient cross-modal loss function, especially when there is limited E2E training data available.

We introduce a general method for the interpretation and comparison of neural models. The method is used to factor a complex neural model into its functional components, which are comprised of sets of co-firing neurons that cut across layers of the network architecture, and which we call neural pathways. The function of these pathways can be understood by identifying correlated task level and linguistic heuristics in such a way that this knowledge acts as a lens for approximating what the network has learned to apply to its intended task. As a case study for investigating the utility of these pathways, we present an examination of pathways identified in models trained for two standard tasks, namely Named Entity Recognition and Recognizing Textual Entailment.

No abstract