This review article is divided into three sections. In Section 1, a short biographical note on Freiherr von Grotthuss is followed by a detailed summary of the main findings and ideas present in his 1806 paper. Attempts to place Grotthuss contribution in the context of the science done at his time were also made. In Section 2, the modern version of the Grotthuss mechanism is reviewed. The classical Grotthuss model has been recently questioned and new mechanisms and ideas regarding proton transfer are briefly discussed. The last section discusses the significance of a classical Grotthuss mechanism for proton transfer in water chains inside protein cavities. This has been an interesting new twist in the ongoing history of the Grotthuss mechanism. A summary and discussion of what was learned from probably the simplest currently available experimental models of proton transfer in water wires in semi-synthetic ion channels are critically presented. This review ends discussing some of the questions that need to be addressed in the near future.

Proton conductivities in bulk solution (lambda(H)) and single-channel proton conductances (g(H)) in two different stereoisomers of the dioxolane-linked gramicidin A channel (the SS and RR dimers) were measured in a wide range of bulk proton concentrations ([H], 0.1-8000 mM). Proton mobilities (micro(H)) in water as well as in the SS and RR dimers were calculated from the conductivity data. In the concentration range of 0.1-2000 mM, a straight line with a slope of 0.75 describes the log (g(H))-log ([H]) relationship in the SS dimer. At [H] > 2000 mM, saturation is followed by a decline in g(H). The g(H)-[H] relationship in the SS dimer is qualitatively similar to the [H] dependence of lambda(H). However, the slope of the straight line in the log(lambda(H))-log([H]) plot is 0.96, indicating that the rate-limiting step for proton conduction through the SS dimer is not the diffusion of protons in bulk solution. The significant difference between the slopes of those linear relationships accounts for the faster decline of micro(H) as a function of [H] in the SS dimer in relation to bulk solution. In the high range of [H], saturation and decline of g(H) in the SS dimer can be accounted for by the significant decrease of micro(H) in bulk solution. At any given [H], g(H) in the RR dimer is significantly smaller than in the SS. Moreover, the g(H)-[H] relationship in the RR stereoisomer is qualitatively different from that in the SS. Between 1 and 50 mM [H], g(H) can be fitted with an adsorption isotherm, suggesting the presence of a proton-binding site inside the pore (pK(a) approximately 2), which limits proton exit from the channel. At 100 mM < [H] < 3000 mM, g(H) increases linearly with [H]. The distinctive shape of the g(H)-[H] relationship in the RR dimer suggests that the channel can be occupied simultaneously by more than one proton. At higher [H], the saturation and decline of g(H) in the RR dimer reflect the properties of micro(H) in bulk solution. In the entire range of [H], protons seem to cross the SS and RR channels via a Grotthuss-like mechanism. The rate-limiting step for proton transfer in the SS dimer is probably the membrane-channel/bulk solution interface. It is also proposed that the smaller g(H) in the RR dimer is the consequence of a different organization and dynamics of the H-bonded network of water molecules inside the pore of the channel, resulting in a slower proton transfer and multiple pore occupancy by protons.

Gramicidin A (gA) molecules were covalently linked with a dioxolane ring. Dioxolane-linked gA dimers formed ion channels, selective for monovalent cations, in planar lipid bilayers. The main goal of this study was to compare the functional single ion channel properties of natural gA and its covalently linked dimer in two different lipid bilayers and HCl concentrations (10-8000 mM). Two ion channels with different gating and conductance properties were identified in bilayers from the product of dimerization reaction. The most commonly observed and most stable gramicidin A dimer is the main object of this study. This gramicidin dimer remained in the open state most of the time, with brief closing flickers (tau(closed) approximately 30 micros). The frequency of closing flickers increased with transmembrane potential, making the mean open time moderately voltage dependent (tau(open) changed approximately 1.43-fold/100 mV). Such gating behavior is markedly different from what is seen in natural gA channels. In PEPC (phosphatidylethanolamine-phosphatidylcholine) bilayers, single-channel current-voltage relationships had an ohmic behavior at low voltages, and a marked sublinearity at relatively higher voltages. This behavior contrasts with what was previously described in GMO (glycerylmonooleate) bilayers. In PEPC bilayers, the linear conductance of single-channel proton currents at different proton concentrations was essentially the same for both natural and gA dimers. g(max) and K(D), obtained from fitting experimental points to a Langmuir adsorption isotherm, were approximately 1500 pS and 300 mM, respectively, for both the natural gA and its dimer. In GMO bilayers, however, proton affinities of gA and the dioxolane-dimer were significantly lower (K(D) of approximately 1 and 1.5 M, respectively), and the g(max) higher (approximately 1750 and 2150 pS, respectively) than in PEPC bilayers. Furthermore, the relationship between single-channel conductance and proton concentration was linear at low bulk concentrations of H+ (0.01-2 M) and saturated at concentrations of more than 3 M. It is concluded that 1) The mobility of protons in gramicidin A channels in different lipid bilayers is remarkably similar to proton mobilities in aqueous solutions. In particular, at high concentrations of HCl, proton mobilities in gramicidin A channel and in solution differ by only 25%. 2) Differences between proton conductances in gramicidin A channels in GMO and PEPC cannot be explained by surface charge effects on PEPC membranes. It is proposed that protonated phospholipids adjacent to the mouth of the pore act as an additional source of protons for conduction through gA channels in relation to GMO bilayers. 3) Some experimental results cannot be reconciled with simple alterations in access resistance to proton flow in gA channels. Said differences could be explained if the structure and/or dynamics of water molecules inside gramicidin A channels is modulated by the lipid environment and by modifications in the structure of gA channels. 4...

The temperature dependencies (range: 5-45 degrees C) of single-channel proton conductances (g(H)) in native gramicidin A (gA) and in two diastereoisomers (SS and RR) of the dioxolane-linked gA channels were measured in glycerylmonooleate/decane (GMO) and diphytanoylphosphatidylcholine/decane (DiPhPC) bilayers. Linear Arrhenius plots (ln (g(H)) versus K(-1)) were obtained for the native gA and RR channels in both types of bilayers, and for the SS channel in GMO bilayers only. The Arrhenius plot for proton transfer in the SS channel in DiPhPC bilayers had a break in linearity around 20 degrees C. This break seems to occur only when protons are the permeating cations in the SS channel. The activation energies (E(a)) for proton transfer in various gA channels (approximately 15 kJ/mol) are consistent with the rate-limiting step being in the channel and/or at the membrane-channel/solution interface, and not in bulk solution. E(a) values for proton transfer in gA channels are considerably smaller than for the permeation of nonproton currents in gA as well as in various other ion channels. The E(a) values for proton transfer in native gA channels are nearly the same in both GMO and DiPhPC bilayers. In contrast, for the dioxolane linked gA dimers, E(a) values were strongly modulated by the lipid environment. The Gibbs activation free energies (Delta G(#)(o)) for protons in various gA channels are within the range of 27-29 kJ/mol in GMO bilayers and of 20-22 kJ/mol in DiPhPC bilayers. The largest difference between Delta G(#)(o) for proton currents occurs between native gA (or SS channels) and the RR channel. In general, the activation entropy (Delta S) is mostly responsible for the differences between g(H) values in various gA channels, and also in distinct bilayers. However, significant differences between the activation enthalpies (Delta H(#)(o)) for proton transfer in the SS and RR channels occur in distinct membranes.

Two different stereoisomers of the dioxolane-linked gramicidin A (gA) channels were individually synthesized (the SS and RR dimers;. Science. 244:813-817). The structural differences between these dimers arise from different chiralities within the dioxolane linker. The SS dimer mimics the helicity and the inter- and intramolecular hydrogen bonding of the monomer-monomer association of gA's. In contrast, there is a significant disruption of the helicity and hydrogen bonding pattern of the ion channel in the RR dimer. Single ion channels formed by the SS and RR dimers in planar lipid bilayers have different proton transport properties. The lipid environment in which the different dimers are reconstituted also has significant effects on single-channel proton conductance (g(H)). g(H) in the SS dimer is about 2-4 times as large as in the RR. In phospholipid bilayers with 1 M [H(+)](bulk), the current-voltage (I-V) relationship of the SS dimer is sublinear. Under identical experimental conditions, the I-V plot of the RR dimer is supralinear (S-shaped). In glycerylmonooleate bilayers with 1 M [H(+)](bulk), both the SS and RR dimers have a supralinear I-V plot. Consistent with results previously published (. Biophys. J. 73:2489-2502), the SS dimer is stable in lipid bilayers and has fast closures. In contrast, the open state of the RR channel has closed states that can last a few seconds, and the channel eventually inactivates into a closed state in either phospholipid or glycerylmonooleate bilayers. It is concluded that the water dynamics inside the pore as related to proton wire transfer is significantly different in the RR and SS dimers. Different physical mechanisms that could account for this hypothesis are discussed. The gating of the synthetic gA dimers seems to depend on the conformation of the dioxolane link between gA's. The experimental results provide an important framework for a detailed investigation at the atomic level of proton conduction in different and relatively simple ion channel structures.