Aims The aim of this registry was to evaluate the additional prognostic value of a composite cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-based risk score over standard-of-care (SOC) evaluation in a large cohort of consecutive unselected non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients. Methods and results In the DERIVATE registry (www.clinicaltrials.gov/registration: RCT#NCT03352648), 1000 (derivation cohort) and 508 (validation cohort) NICM patients with chronic heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction <50% were included. All-cause mortality and major adverse arrhythmic cardiac events (MAACE) were the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. During a median follow-up of 959 days, all-cause mortality and MAACE occurred in 72 (7%) and 93 (9%) patients, respectively. Age and >3 segments with midwall fibrosis on late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were the only independent predictors of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.036, 95% CI: 1.0117–1.056, P < 0.001 and HR: 2.077, 95% CI: 1.211–3.562, P = 0.008, respectively). For MAACE, the independent predictors were male gender, left ventricular end-diastolic volume index by CMR (CMR-LVEDVi), and >3 segments with midwall fibrosis on LGE (HR: 2.131, 95% CI: 1.231–3.690, P = 0.007; HR: 3.161, 95% CI: 1.750–5.709, P < 0.001; and HR: 1.693, 95% CI: 1.084–2.644, P = 0.021, respectively). A composite clinical and CMR-based risk score provided a net reclassification improvement of 63.7% (P < 0.001) for MAACE occurrence when added to the model based on SOC evaluation. These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort. Conclusion In a large multicentre, multivendor cohort registry reflecting daily clinical practice in NICM work-up, a composite clinical and CMR-based risk score provides incremental prognostic value beyond SOC evaluation, which may have impact on the indication of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.

Background: Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a socially relevant condition carrying an adverse prognosis. Systematic analysis is needed of the relationship between quality of life (QoL) – what patients are most interested in – and objective parameters of CHF severity – which largely determines physicians’ care. Methods: We prospectively investigated QoL, as ascertained by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, alongside all the currently used objective clinical/instrumental (electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, hemodynamic and functional capacity) indicators of disease severity in 106 consecutive CHF patients. Results: Besides persistence of sinus rhythm (p = 0.007), the only objective parameters that correlated with QoL were NYHA class (p < 0.001) and distance covered during the six minutes walking test (p < 0.001) (two indications of patients’ ability to attend to their daily needs). Presence of left bundle branch block was associated with a worse QoL only in patients with CHF due to ischemic heart disease (p = 0.032). All the other clinical/instrumental parameters showed no relation with QoL (p > 0.150 in all cases). Conclusions: Objective indicators of disease severity, which largely determine physicians’ care, appear to have little bearing on QoL, suggesting that current treatment for CHF fails to satisfy patients’ perceived needs. The possibility of cost-effective nonpharmaceutical therapeutic protocols (e.g. psychological interventions) specifically designed to improve patients’ QoL deserves investigation as a much needed new approach to the management of CHF.

No abstract

No abstract

AimsThe use of beta-blocker therapy in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is debated. We aimed at describing patterns of beta-blocker prescription through a nationwide survey. Methods and results From 11 referral centres, we retrospectively collected data of CA patients with a first evaluation after 2016 (n = 642). Clinical characteristics at first and last evaluation were collected, with a focus on medical therapy. For patients in whom beta-blocker therapy was started, stopped, or continued between first and last evaluation, the main reason for beta-blocker management was requested. Median age of study population was 77 years; 81% were men. Arterial hypertension was found in 58% of patients, atrial fibrillation (AF) in 57%, and coronary artery disease in 16%. Left ventricular ejection fraction was preserved in 62% of cases, and 74% of patients had advanced diastolic dysfunction. Out of the 250 CA patients on beta-blockers at last evaluation, 215 (33%) were already taking this therapy at first evaluation, while 35 (5%) were started it, in both cases primarily because of high-rate AF. One-hundred-nineteen patients (19%) who were on beta-blocker at first evaluation had this therapy withdrawn, mainly because of intolerance in the presence of heart failure with advanced diastolic dysfunction. The remaining 273 patients (43%) had never received beta-blocker therapy. Beta-blockers usage was similar between CA aetiologies. Patients taking vs. not taking beta-blockers differed only for a greater prevalence of arterial hypertension, coronary artery disease, AF, and non-restrictive filling pattern (P < 0.01 for all) in the former group. Conclusions Beta-blockers prescription is not infrequent in CA. Such therapy may be tolerated in the presence of co-morbidities for which beta-blockers are routinely used and in the absence of advanced diastolic dysfunction.