The aims of this study were to develop a device for measuring the tightness of proximal tooth contact and to evaluate the proximal contact tightness using this device at rest and during clenching. Twenty young adult volunteers with healthy dentition participated in this experiment. The tightness of proximal tooth contact between the second premolar and the first molar of both the maxilla and the mandible was measured by pulling a stainless steel strip between them at rest, and at 20 and 50% clenching levels of maximum voluntary contraction of masseter muscles at intercuspal position. Proximal contact tightness increased as the clenching levels of both the maxilla and the mandible increased. At rest, proximal contact tightness was less in the maxilla than in the mandible, whereas during clenching it was less in the mandible. These results indicate that during clenching, the teeth are displaced and they contact appropriately with adjacent teeth, making it possible to exert sufficient occlusal force while maintaining the integrity of dental arches.

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between occlusal tooth contact patterns and the tightness of proximal tooth contact (TPTC) during clenching. Twenty young adult volunteers with healthy dentition participated in the study. TPTC between the left second premolar (P2) and the first molar (M1) was measured during clenching at the 50% maximum voluntary contraction level in the intercuspal position (ICP). A silicone impression material was used to make an interocclusal record at the ICP in each subject, and interocclusal records were analysed using an image-processing system. Subjects were classified according to the presence or absence of each type (A, B or C) of occlusal contact. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The results of this study exhibited a relationship between B-type contact and the TPTC of maxillary teeth. The experimental group with a lack of B-type contact on maxillary P2 and/or M1 showed a statistically greater TPTC than the group with B-type contact on both of these teeth (P < 0.01). These results suggest that occlusal tooth contact patterns have an influence on TPTC during clenching.

No abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEMProper proximal contact is important for maintaining and stabilizing the dental arch. However, the proximal contact strength (PCS) is not a constant value and can be affected by a variety of factors.PURPOSEThis study examined the influences of postural changes on the posterior PCS.MATERIAL AND METHODSTwelve adults with a normal occlusion and had not undergone prosthetic treatment or proximal restoration were participated in this study. A metal strip was inserted into the proximal surface and removed at a constant velocity. The contact strength was measured in every contact point between canine to second molar in both arches. The PCSs were obtained initially in the upright position, secondly in the supine position and finally in the upright position again. All measurements were repeated after a 2 hour period. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Friedman test (P < .05).RESULTSGenerally, a decrease in PCS occurred when the posture was changed from the initial upright to supine position, while it increased when the posture was changed from the supine to upright position. A significant change was observed in all areas except for between the canine-first premolar in the maxilla and between the first molarsecond molar in the mandible areas.CONCLUSIONThe posterior PCS, which dentists generally believe to be a static feature of occlusion, is affected significantly by posture.