Diagnosis of the type of glomerular disease that causes the nephrotic syndrome is necessary for appropriate treatment and typically requires a renal biopsy. The goal of this study was to identify candidate protein biomarkers to diagnose glomerular diseases. Proteomic methods and informatic analysis were used to identify patterns of urine proteins that are characteristic of the diseases. Urine proteins were separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis in 32 patients with FSGS, lupus nephritis, membranous nephropathy, or diabetic nephropathy. Protein abundances from 16 patients were used to train an artificial neural network to create a prediction algorithm. The remaining 16 patients were used as an external validation set to test the accuracy of the prediction algorithm. In the validation set, the model predicted the presence of the diseases with sensitivities between 75 and 86% and specificities from 92 to 67%. The probability of obtaining these results in the novel set by chance is 5 ؋ 10 ؊8 . Twenty-one gel spots were most important for the differentiation of the diseases. The spots were cut from the gel, and 20 were identified by mass spectrometry as charge forms of 11 plasma proteins: Orosomucoid, transferrin, ␣-1 microglobulin, zinc ␣-2 glycoprotein, ␣-1 antitrypsin, complement factor B, haptoglobin, transthyretin, plasma retinol binding protein, albumin, and hemopexin. These data show that diseases that cause nephrotic syndrome change glomerular protein permeability in characteristic patterns. The fingerprint of urine protein charge forms identifies the glomerular disease. The identified proteins are candidate biomarkers that can be tested in assays that are more amenable to clinical testing.
We have identified a list of protein spots that can be used to develop a clinical assay to predict ISN/RPS class and chronicity for patients with lupus nephritis. An assay based on antibodies against these spots could eliminate the need for renal biopsy, allow frequent evaluation of disease status, and begin specific therapy for patients with lupus nephritis.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an important cause of death among hospitalized patients. The 2 most common causes of AKI are acute tubular necrosis (ATN) and prerenal azotemia (PRA). Appropriate diagnosis of the disease is important but often difficult. We analyzed urine proteins by 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis from 38 patients with AKI. Patients were randomly assigned to a training set, an internal test set, or an external validation set. Spot abundances were analyzed by artificial neural networks to identify biomarkers that differentiate between ATN and PRA. When the trained neural network algorithm was tested against the training data, it identified the diagnosis for 16 of 18 patients in the training set and all 10 patients in the internal test set. The accuracy was validated in the novel external set of patients where conditions of 9 of 10 patients were correctly diagnosed including 5 of 5 with ATN and 4 of 5 with PRA. Plasma retinol-binding protein was identified in 1 spot and a fragment of albumin and plasma retinol-binding protein in the other. These proteins are candidate markers for diagnostic assays of AKI.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a process that can lead to renal failure. No biological markers are available for predicting the cause or prognosis of AKI. Tests that can predict which patients will need renal replacement therapy (RRT) are needed. In this chapter, we review the recent literature for proteomic analysis in AKI and identify new candidate markers to predict the need for RRT. We also used artificial neural network (ANN) analysis of urine protein data obtained by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis from 19 patients with acute tubular necrosis to identify a set of proteins that can predict whether a patient will require RRT. Ten patients were randomly selected to train an ANN algorithm. The remaining 9 patients were withheld to serve as an independent validation set. The ANN algorithm correctly predicted the renal prognosis of all 10 patients in the training set. In the validation set, the test correctly predicted the future course of renal failure in 7 of the 9 patients (78% accuracy) including 3 of 4 patients who would require RRT (75% sensitivity) and 4 of 5 who would not (80% specificity). Combinations of urine proteins can be used to predict which patients will require RRT.
Evolutionary constraint for insertions and deletions (indels) is not necessarily equal to constraint for nucleotide substitutions for any given region of a genome. Knowing the variation in indel-specific evolutionary rates across the sequence will aid our understanding of evolutionary constraints on indels, and help us infer how indels have contributed to the evolution of the sequence. However, unlike for nucleotide substitutions, there has been no phylogenetic method that can statistically infer significantly different rates of indels across the sequence space independent of substitution rates. Here, we have developed a software that will find sites with accelerated evolutionary rates specific to indels, by introducing a scaling parameter that only applies to the indel rates and not to the nucleotide substitution rates. Using the software, we show that we can find regions of accelerated rates of indels in the protein alignments of primate genomes. We also confirm that the sites that have high rates of indels are different from the sites that have high rates of nucleotide substitutions within the protein sequences. By identifying regions with accelerated rates of indels independent of nucleotide substitutions, we will be able to better understand the impact of indel mutations on protein sequence evolution.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00239-016-9761-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.