Objective The main objective of this article is to characterize ophthalmology consultations in the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary care hospital and identify specific ways to modify the curriculum for ophthalmology and emergency medicine residency programs to train residents to effectively manage eye-related consultations. Design This is a retrospective chart review study of ED encounters between January 1, 2008 and January 1, 2017 during which ophthalmology was consulted. Setting Single-center urban tertiary care center. Participants All adult patients who were seen by the ophthalmology consultation service in the ED during the study time period. Main Outcome Measured We identified the reason for and timing of ophthalmology consultation; diagnoses made in the ED and follow-up ophthalmology clinic visit; procedures resulting from consultation; and communication with a senior resident, fellow, or attending. Results We identified 3,583 consecutive ED encounters with an ophthalmology consultation over a 9-year period. About 51.1% of patients were female and mean age of patients was 49 years. Blurry vision/vision loss was the most common reason for consultation (24.8%) and posterior vitreous detachment was the most common diagnosis made in the ED by the ophthalmology team (11.0%). Of the patients with documented follow-up ophthalmology clinic visits, 96.7% of diagnoses made at the first ophthalmology clinic visit were the same as those determined in the ED. About 12.7% of visits resulted in a procedure with the most common being eyelid laceration repairs, pars plana vitrectomy, and laser retinopexy. Overall, 40.4% of visits required communication with a senior resident, fellow, or attending. The frequency of residents seeking assistance from more senior ophthalmologists decreased over the course of the academic year (p < 0.0001). Conclusions This study provides data that ophthalmology residency training programs can use to more effectively prepare residents for consultations in the ED. Furthermore, identifying the reasons for consultation and subsequent diagnoses can guide the education of emergency medicine physicians to improve their ability to diagnose and triage ophthalmologic presentations.
No abstract
Introduction: When indicated, the intraoperative use of frozen sections may assist in determining the surgical course or appropriate processing of surgical specimens. Knowing the accuracy of a preliminary frozen section diagnosis is important. The purpose of this study is to determine the rate of correlation between frozen and permanent histopathologic diagnosis for adult orbital lesions, analyze characteristics of discordant cases, and examine the effects of discordance on surgical decision making. Methods: A 15-year retrospective chart review was conducted at a tertiary care center of all adult patients with orbital lesions for which frozen section and corresponding permanent section tissue diagnoses were obtained. Results: 65 orbital surgeries were performed with a total of 89 frozen sections sampled. In 63 surgeries (96.9%), at least one frozen section diagnosis matched the final permanent section diagnosis. Overall, frozen section diagnosis corresponded with permanent section diagnosis in 81 of 89 (91.0%) specimens. Of the eight (9.0%) specimens from five unique patients that did not correlate, the final diagnoses on permanent sections were: amyloidosis (5), margin-positive infiltrating breast carcinoma (2), and lymphoid hyperplasia (1). The discrepancy between frozen and permanent sections did not alter care in any patient. Conclusion: Frozen section diagnoses correlates with permanent histopathologic tissue diagnosis in adult orbital biopsies in greater than 90% of cases. Among non-correlated specimens, amyloidosis was the most common diagnosis. Although rare, orbital amyloid disorders may be considered in the differential diagnosis of cases of orbital biopsies with nonspecific findings on frozen section.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.