IntroductionDrug abuse and overdoses are on the rise in West Virginia. Multiple socioeconomic and prescription-prescribing practices influenced this shift. The shifting burden of intravenous drug use to more rural areas has created unique challenges for patient access (medical attention, addiction education, rehabilitation), as well as created an avalanche of additional costs for hospital networks.MethodsWe analyzed sepsis cases from 2006 to 2015 to investigate whether different types of drug use have increased the odds of developing sepsis as compared to other forms of drug use. To investigate this aspect, the authors examined this relationship by using a logistical regression and a time series analysis of the total cases of drug use and infections.ResultsThe initial analysis investigated the association between drug use and the number of sepsis cases at Charleston Area Medical Center from 2006 to 2015 using a time series analysis. Results suggest that there are similar relationships between sepsis and sedative usage (p=0.016) and sepsis by mixed/other drug (p= 0.020) use. For logistic regression (n=2284), the infection models of sepsis/skin, endocarditis/skin infection, and osteomyelitis/skin infection showed several exposures significantly increased the risk of different infections. A drug user with a positive urine test for opiates is 80.8 percent more likely to develop sepsis as compared to skin infections (p=0.001). The use of sedatives also significantly increased the odds of developing sepsis by 83.2 percent (p=0.002).ConclusionSepsis left untreated will result in a high mortality rate. As illicit drug use increases, sepsis cases will increase. Further research is needed to understand the continued relationship between drug use and the incidence of sepsis. Based on the current evidence, sepsis appears to be slightly affected by drug use and seems to be influenced by sedatives and opiates but only at a marginal level.

BackgroundAortic stenosis is classified as stenosis that can be caused by a congenital disability in infants and children but is more commonly produced by a degenerative process of calcification and scarring of the valve in the later decades of life. High systemic pressure and hemodynamic disturbances characteristic of this area of the cardiovascular system makes the aortic valve susceptible to plaque and cholesterol buildup over time, similarly to atherosclerosis, contributing to the pathology of aortic stenosis. Thus, this study aims to assess the short and long-term clinical outcomes of risk factor reduction, post transcatheter aortic valve replacement (post-TAVR), and results of tested medication outcomes.MethodsData were obtained from Charleston Area Medical Center, which is a tertiary care 800-bed community teaching facility and was examined using STATA 11.4 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas, USA), a Cox proportional hazards model to test for clinical significance. This study examined the medications aspirin, clopidogrel, beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Additional medications analyzed included statin, anticoagulant, aspirin with clopidogrel, and beta-blocker with ACE inhibitor and statin following the procedure of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and the overall risk of a hazard event of mortality.ResultsResults suggest that clopidogrel by itself had the lower rate of mortality at one year with hazards of 0.6906, a p-value of 0.221 and a 95% confidence interval of 0.3677 - 1.259; and at three years with hazards of 0.4845, a p-value of 0.027 and a 95% confidence interval of 0.2552 - 0.9201. Statins had the second-lowest rate at one year with hazards of 0.7299 and a p-value 0.215 and a 95% confidence interval of 0.4438 - 1.200; and at three years with hazard of 0.8529 and a p-value of 0.530 and a 95% confidence interval of 0.5192 - 1.401. Both of these medications had a consistent lower hazard and/or risk of death compared to other standard medication regiments. Within our center's data, clopidogrel had the best clinical outcome. ConclusionsThis study showed that therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel alone did not demonstrate a significant increase in mortality versus alternative anticoagulation therapy in patients post aortic valve replacement. Clopidogrel and statin usage post-aortic valve revascularization may have a trend towards a reduction in mortality.

IntroductionThe effect of insurance coverage on the health of at-risk populations is poorly understood in the Appalachian region of the United States. The goal of this study is to examine how different types of insurance coverage (Private Insurance, Medicare under 65, Medicare 65 or over, Medicaid and Self Pay) may influence cancer survival over time. This study analyzes colon, bladder, as well as combines anal, rectal, and esophageal cancers.MethodsWe systematically analyzed all West Virginia Cancer Registry patients between the years of 2000 and 2013 who was diagnosed with colon, bladder, anal, rectal, and esophageal cancers. Separate analysis examined colon (n = 927), bladder (n = 269), and combined anal, rectum, and esophageal cancers (n = 398). Cox proportional hazards models investigated the effect of insurance types on survival while controlling for age, sex, tobacco use, alcohol use, and cancer stage.ResultsOverall, tobacco use marginally significantly decreased colon cancer survival. Tobacco use had a suggestive relationship at hazards ratio at 1.150, 95% confidence interval: 0.9990-1.235, p = 0.052. The type of payer group did not alter survival. Older individuals tend to have a lower survival rate compared to those that are younger at the time of diagnosis. Also, late-stage cancer faced lower survival compared to those with early-stage cancer. Other results within stage groups corresponded to existing literature.ConclusionFor the three differing cancer groupings, there was no significant survival difference for patients by insurance type. The effect of tobacco usage on colon cancer survival merits further research. The study design could be improved by considering more risk factors such as patient comorbidities that might affect patient care and survival.

No abstract

Atraumatic adrenal hemorrhage is a rare injury, often due to the disruption of normal hemostasis secondary to sepsis, autoimmune disease, or chronic anticoagulation. We present a case of recurrent adrenal hemorrhage in a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome previously maintained on warfarin for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism prophylaxis who worsened shortly after transition to apixaban therapy. Initial left-sided adrenal hemorrhage occurred four weeks after beginning apixaban, followed by the development of retinal hemorrhage and later right-sided adrenal hemorrhage. This is, to date, the first reported case of adrenal hemorrhage in a patient receiving chronic anticoagulation with apixaban.