Introduction: Shadowing a physician is an observational experience which includes a student observing a licensed healthcare provider caring for patients. Shadowing is commonly done by students before and during medical school, but little is known about the nature or extent of these extra-curricular observational experiences. Objective: We hypothesized that shadowing experiences were common yet variable. We investigated the prevalence, nature, and perceived value of medical student experiences with shadowing physicians (both before and during medical school). Methods: This survey-based study was non-experimental with a cross-sectional convenience sample of osteopathic medical students about their shadowing experiences before and during medical school. The survey was sent to all matriculated osteopathic medical students (OMS1-4) for the 2017 to 2018 academic year from two medical schools: Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine (PCOM) (1084 total students) and PCOM-Georgia (554 total students). The final survey instrument included three sections: demographics (6 questions), pre-medical shadowing experiences (21 questions), and medical student shadowing experiences (24 questions). Results: Respondents (357) identified themselves as OMS1 (96), OMS2 (89), OMS3 (73), OMS4 (95) and other (2, OMS5) with enrollment at PCOM-Philadelphia (242) and PCOM-Georgia (115). Among survey respondents, 339 (95.5%) reported shadowing a physician as a pre-medical student, and 110 (30.8%) reported shadowing (outside of their required clinical rotations) a physician during medical school. Requirements to participate were inconsistent; fewer than 50% of shadowing experiences required Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) training, proof of vaccination, or purified protein derivative (PPD) documentation. In addition to observation, pre-medical and medical students, respectively, participated in history taking (44 [13%], 47 [42.7%]), physical examinations (45 [13.3%], 44 [40%]) and procedures (13, [3.8%], 20 [18.2%]) during their shadowing experiences. Motivations to participate in shadowing varied between pre-medical and medical student experiences, but both groups mentioned their desire to learn more about a particular discipline, obtain letters of recommendation, and gain patient care experience. Students recommended both pre-medical (273 [80.5%]) and medical school (93 [84.5%]) shadowing to future students. Conclusion: Shadowing remains a common and important tool for students to learn about patient care, medicine and careers. The nature of each shadowing experience and participation requirements are quite variable. Measures to ensure patient safety, confidentiality, liability and supervision are inconsistently applied. Promoting guidelines, as well as codes of conduct, for shadowing could serve as a helpful resource for students, academic advisors and supervising clinici...

Introduction Increased education may improve awareness of antimicrobial resistance (AMR)1 however 43% of people aged 16-65 in England lack skills to understand health information2. This study aimed to improve patient knowledge on short course antibiotics using a patient information leaflet (PIL) incorporating Health Literacy (HL) techniques supporting the governments’ 5 year 2019 AMR strategy. Method This study received ethics approval. A revised Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS) checklist for Community Pharmacy PIL incorporating HL techniques was piloted then used for 5-weeks as a counselling tool by 8 consenting community pharmacists. It was handed to patients during the dispensing of short-course antibiotics after which the pharmacists filled out a questionnaire. Results 106 patients were counselled and all 8 pharmacists completed questionnaires on how the PIL supported their practice. On a scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (improved a lot), pharmacists scored how much they thought the PIL could improve patient’s knowledge on appropriate antibiotic use. 63% of pharmacists (5/8) scored the PIL ‘5’ or ‘4’. 63% of pharmacists (5/8) did not feel that the PIL took longer than their standard counselling. 66% (2/3) felt that the extra time was worthwhile. Conclusion Pharmacists believed written information using HL techniques led to improved AMR education at the point of antibiotic dispensing. References 1.Health Education England. Tackling antimicrobial resistance: educational priorities London; 2018. 2. Rowlands G, et al. A mismatch between population health literacy and the complexity of health information: an observational study. British Journal of General Practice [Internet]. 2015;65(635):e379-e386.

Introduction The purpose of medicines labelling and packaging is to provide clear unambiguous identification of the medicine and the conditions for its safe use, allowing patients to understand and act on the information.1 Inappropriate antibiotic usage, (deviation from directions provided to the patients by the prescriber, resulting in sub-optimal treatment) may result in exposing bacteria to sub-therapeutic plasma concentrations and/or environment, which are one of the main drivers of Antibiotic Resistance.2 A recent comprehensive analysis showed the global burden associated with drug-resistant infections in 2019 was an estimated 4.95 million deaths.3 Aim To ascertain the support from pharmacists and the public and their perceptions on the likely barriers to harmonising or standardising physical appearance and/or messaging on antibiotic packaging to reduce inappropriate antibiotic usage. Methods This study received ethics approval from the University of Huddersfield. In partnership with NHS England Antimicrobial Stewardship lead for North-East and Yorkshire, two questionnaires (public and pharmacist) were piloted. The final version was transferred to Qualtrics (online questionnaire format). During a 5-week period public questionnaires were distributed via posters with QR codes and social media. Pharmacist questionnaires were emailed to consenting pharmacists (community, hospital, GP practice, industry) around Huddersfield, Doncaster, Rochdale, Dewsbury and Leeds. The data underwent descriptive statistical analysis. Results Inappropriate antibiotic usage (saving for future use) was admitted by 23.5% of the 174 public participants, sharing with others (2.5%), throwing their antibiotics in the bin (32.7%) and other inappropriate usage was reported. This compared to 22.2% returning antibiotics to the pharmacy for disposal. 100% of pharmacists (40) think inappropriate antibiotic use needs to be addressed; the majority of pharmacists (55.5%) and the public (61.4%) think a harmonised antibiotic appearance would reduce inappropriate use. ‘Putting the word “ANTIBIOTICS” on the packaging would improve antibiotic packaging appearance’ was the top improvement selected by pharmacists (38.3%) and public (35.3%). Pharmacists (38.9%) thought antibiotic manufacturers would be the greatest obstacle to harmonised packaging. The majority of public (70.5%) and pharmacists (85.3%) think a standardised messaging system would help reduce inappropriate antibiotic use. Both pharmacists (41.1%) and public (47%) highlighted that a standard leaflet for appropriate use could improve antibiotic use. Pharmacists (47.8%) thought that multiple stakeholders (e.g., MHRA, manufacturers, etc) would be the barriers to a standardised messaging. Discussion/Conclusion Inappropriate antibiotic use by individuals who re-use leftovers or share their antibiotics may result in a treatment failure and could to increase AMR. Improvements in antibiotic packaging and patient information leaflets with appropriate disposal instructions could help minimise AMR. Limitations of this study include the low number of practice and industrial pharmacist respondents compared to community and hospital pharmacists. Public and pharmacist respondents supported the wording “ANTIBIOTIC” on antibiotic packaging and a standardised leaflet covering increasing adherence and appropriate disposal of leftovers. This study warrants further evaluation with regulators, manufacturers and other key stakeholders. References 1. HM Government. Best practice guidance on the labelling and packaging of medicines. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/best-practice-in-the-labelling-and-packaging-of-medicines (Accessed: 10/09/22). 2. Gullberg, E., et al. Selection of resistant bacteria at very low antibiotic concentrations. PLoS Pathogens, 2011;7(7):e1002158. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002158 3. Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0.

Introduction Increased education may improve awareness of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), however 43% of people aged 16-65 in England lack skills to understand health information1.This study aimed to improve patient knowledge on short course antibiotics using a patient information leaflet (PIL) incorporating Health Literacy (HL) techniques supporting the Governments’ 5 year 2019 AMR strategy. Method This study received ethics approval. A revised Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS) checklist for Community Pharmacy PIL incorporating HL techniques was piloted, then used for 5-weeks as a counselling tool by 8 consenting community pharmacists. It was handed to patients during dispensing of short-course antibiotics, after which the pharmacists filled out a questionnaire. Patients receiving counselling using the PIL completed face to face questionnaires. Results 106 patient questionnaires were completed. 94% of patients had taken antibiotics previously and 90% of these thought the counselling received using the PIL was easier to understand than previous counselling. 96% of patients agreed the PIL improved their knowledge on appropriate antibiotic use. 81% of patients intended to change their behaviour and thought the PIL had improved their antibiotic knowledge especially to “always finish a prescribed course of antibiotics”. All patients stated the PIL was easy to follow. Conclusion This pilot suggests that patient behaviour can be influenced using structured counselling on AMR drawing on HL techniques. References 1 Rowlands G, Protheroe J, et al. A mismatch between population health literacy and the complexity of health information: an observational study. British Journal of General Practice. 2015;65(635):e379-e386.