Les alphabets anatoliens, à savoir le phrygien, le lydien, le carien, le lycien et le sidétique, attestés en Asie Mineure au i er millénaire avant J.-C., et qui transcrivent des langues indo-européennes, nous conduisent à nous interroger sur leurs origines. En effet, entre les mondes grec et sémitique, partageant des caractéristiques non seulement avec l’alphabet grec mais aussi avec les alphabets sémitiques, ces alphabets anatoliens peuvent très bien être dérivés de l’un ou des autres. Ainsi, l’adaptation de ces alphabets au phrygien et à des langues anatoliennes paraît beaucoup plus grande et plus complexe qu’il n’y paraît au premier abord.
To go (back) and settle down in a FrenchPolynesian island : toward a new mobility paradigm ? The example of Rurutu (Austral Islands) At a time when the major territorial patterns are ruled by metropolitan logics, and characterized by the marginalization of landlocked or poorly connected places, processes of valuing margins are paradoxically emerging. These dynamics are reflected through new forms of mobility that are upsetting the classical pattern, more centripetal and determined by economic reasons. In French Polynesia, net migration of some remote islands like Rurutu in Australes archipellago has recently become positive. Would this be an illustration of margins attractiveness and the setting up of a new mobility model as observed in Europe, or should we grasp this evolution in the light of radically different Oceanian benchmarks ? Based on research carried out in Rurutu, this article questions the nature and the sources of contemporary mobility in French Polynesia as well as the existence of a post-modern mobility model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.