The diagnosis of glioblastoma (GBM) often carries a dismal prognosis, with a median survival of 14.6 months. A particular challenge is the diagnosis of GBM in the elderly population (age > 75 years), who have significant comorbidities, present with worse functional status, and are at higher risk with surgical treatments. We sought to evaluate the impact of current GBM treatment, specifically in the elderly population. The authors undertook a retrospective review of all patients aged 75 or older who underwent treatment for GBM from 1997 to 2016. Patient outcomes were evaluated with regards to demographics, surgical variables, postoperative treatment, and complications. A total of 82 patients (mean age 80.5 ± 3.8 years) were seen. Most patients presented with confusion (57.3%) and associated comorbidities, and prior anticoagulation use was common in this age group. Extent of resection (EOR) included no surgery (9.8%), biopsy (22.0%), subtotal resection (40.2%), and gross-total resection (23.2%). Postoperative adjuvant therapy included temozolomide (36.1%), radiation (52.5%), and bevacizumab (11.9%). A mean overall survival of 6.3 ± 1.2 months was observed. There were 34 complications in 23 patients. Improved survival was seen with increased EOR only for patients without postoperative complications. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that complications (HR = 5.43, 95% CI 1.73, 17.04, p = 0.004) predicted poor outcome. Long-term survivors (> 12 months survival) and short-term survivors had similar median preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score (80 vs. 80, p = 0.43), but long-term survivors had unchanged postoperative KPS (80 vs. 60, p = 0.02) and no complications (0/9 vs. 23/72, p = 0.04). The benefit of glioblastoma treatment in our series was limited by the postoperative complications and KPS. Presence of a complication served as an independent risk factor for worsened overall survival in this age group. It is likely that decreased patient function limits postoperative adjuvant therapy and predisposes to higher morbidity especially in this age group.

OBJECTIVEHypovitaminosis D is prevalent in neurocritical care patients, but the potential to improve patient outcome by replenishing vitamin D has not been investigated. This single-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized (1:1) clinical trial was designed to assess the effect on patient outcome of vitamin D supplementation in neurocritical care patients with hypovitaminosis D.METHODSFrom October 2016 until April 2018, emergently admitted neurocritical care patients with vitamin D deficiency (≤ 20 ng/ml) were randomized to receive vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol, 540,000 IU) (n = 134) or placebo (n = 133). Hospital length of stay (LOS) was the primary outcome; secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, repeat vitamin D levels, patient complications, and patient disposition. Exploratory analysis evaluated specific subgroups of patients by LOS, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II).RESULTSTwo-hundred seventy-four patients were randomized (intent-to-treat) and 267 were administered treatment within 48 hours of admission (as-treated; 61.2% of planned recruitment) and monitored. The mean age of as-treated patients was 54.0 ± 17.2 years (56.9% male, 77.2% white). After interim analysis suggested a low conditional power for outcome difference (predictive power 0.12), the trial was halted. For as-treated patients, no significant difference in hospital LOS (10.4 ± 14.5 days vs 9.1 ± 7.9 days, p = 0.4; mean difference 1.3, 95% CI −1.5 to 4.1) or ICU LOS (5.8 ± 7.5 days vs 5.4 ± 6.4 days, p = 0.4; mean difference 0.4, 95% CI −1.3 to 2.1) was seen between vitamin D3 and placebo groups, respectively. Vitamin D3 supplementation significantly improved repeat serum levels compared with placebo (20.8 ± 9.3 ng/ml vs 12.8 ± 4.8 ng/ml, p < 0.001) without adverse side effects. No subgroups were identified by exclusion of LOS outliers or segregation by GCS score, SAPS II, or severe vitamin D deficiency (≤ 10 ng/ml).CONCLUSIONSDespite studies showing that vitamin D can predict prognosis, supplementation in vitamin D–deficient neurocritical care patients did not result in appreciable improvement in outcomes and likely does not play a role in acute clinical recovery.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02881957 (clinicaltrials.gov)

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract