Abstrak: Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi usaha penemuan nilai--nilai keindonesiaan dalam novel--novel Pramoedya Ananta Toer (Pram). Masalah penelitian meliputi nilai multikulturalisme, mo--dernisme, dan nasionalisme keindonesiaan dalam novel--novel

This study aims to describe (1) the form of anger of the main character in the novel "Perempuan Bersampur Merah" by Intan Andaru and (2) the factors of anger of the main character in the novel "Perempuan Bersampur Merah" by Intan Andaru, also describe (3) the psychological impact of the main character in the novel “Perempuan Bersampur Merah” by Intan Andaru. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. The subject of this research is the novel "Perempuan Bersampur Merah" by Intan Andaru. The method of data collection is done by reading and note-taking techniques. The data were analyzed by qualitative descriptive technique, which is a research procedure with descriptive data presented in the form of the author's speech in the novel "Perempuan Bersampur Merah" by Intan Andaru.. The results showed that (1) the form of anger of the main character in the novel "Perempuan Bersampur Merah" by Intan Andaru, namely the anger described by the author in the main character, anger is an expression of human emotions in venting dissatisfaction, disappointment or mistakes when there is an emotional turmoil that does not occur. controlled include revenge, curiosity, irritation, hurt and overflowing emotions (2) the factors of anger between characters in the novel "Perempuan Bersampur Merah" by Intan Andaru there are several factors, namely environmental factors, family factors, social factors. Not only that, anger also arises on the basis of feeling disappointed, irritated, disgusted and annoyed. (3) the psychological impact of the main character in the novel "Perempuan Bersampur Merah" by Intan Andaru caused several problems for the main character, namely being depressed, uncomfortable with their environment, potentially hurting themselves, interfering with children's relationships with parents, even with family, problems with friends peers, school environment, even the environment where the child lives.

AbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan menjelaskan pemikiran filsafat dalam novel Tarian Setan dan Siddharta (2007). Kumpulan pemikiran filsafat yang dibangun adalah hasrat karakter sebagai representasi manusia sehingga semua argumen yang dibangun berakar pada latar belakang kemunculan hasrat, proses hasrat, dan hasil hasrat. Berdasarkan pemikiran filsafat, bisa disimpulkan bahwa Hasqil dan Siddharta memiliki hasrat menjadi karena pengaruh imitasi, mimetik. Dalam proses menjadi yang disebabkan oleh mimetik, bisa diidentifikasi bahwa Hasqil lebih memiliki hasrat fisik, agresif, sementara Siddharta memiliki hasrat psikologis, reseptif. Sebagai subjek yang memiliki hasrat menjadi, Hasqil dan Siddharta bisa dianggap sebagai korban karena keduanya tidak pernah bebas dalam menentukan hasratnya sendiri. Individu adalah korban lingkungannya. Ironi tentang keterjebakan manusia pada hasrat libidinal telah didemonstrasikan oleh kedua karakter tersebut. Hasqil telah terjebak dalam hasrat libidinal sehingga menjadi orang gagal, sementara Siddharta secara sengaja menjebak dirinya sendiri untuk proses kesadaran menjadi karena prinsip bahwa hidup adalah tindakan. Hasrat kematian selalu menjadi bagian dari proses menjadi untuk tiap individu. Kematian adalah sebuah pelarian dari ketidakbahagiaan dan harapan untuk sekaligus meraih kebahagiaan.Kata kunci: proses menjadi, hasrat, Tarian Setan, Siddharta Abstract THE PROCESS OF BEING IN SADDAM HUSSEIN'S TARIAN SETAN AND HERMAN HESSE'S SIDDHARTAThis paper is aimed to explain the philosophical way of thinking in the novels Tarian Setan and Siddharta (2007). The collection of way of thinking built is the character's desire as a human representation so that all arguments built are rooted in the background of desire emergence, desire process, and desire result. Based on the philosophical way of thinking, it can be concluded that Hasqil and Siddharta have a desire of being for the influence of imitation, mimetic. In the process of being caused by the mimetic, it can be identified that Hasqil has a more physical desire, aggressive, whereas Siddharta has a psychological desire, receptive. As a subject having a desire of being, Hasqil and Siddharta can be regarded as victims since both have never been free in deciding their own desire. Individuals are their environment's victims. The irony of human entrapment towards libidinal desire has been demonstrated by the two characters. Hasqil has been trapped in libidinal desire that he becomes a failed person, whereas Siddharta has intentionally trapped himself for the process of consciousness of being because of a principle that life is action. The desire of death has always become a part of the process of being for every individual. Death is an escape from unhappiness and a hope to get a hold of happiness all together.