BackgroundThe present study aimed to investigate risk factors for expulsion in immediate postplacental IUD insertion. We specifically sought to determine whether cesarean delivery before or during labor have an impact on IUD expulsion.MethodsThe study included 160 pregnant women for immediate IUD insertion following vaginal or cesarean delivery. Three groups of patients were recruited: Patients who underwent pre-planned cesarean delivery (group 1, n: 51), patients who underwent cesarean delivery during active labor (group 2, n: 47), patients who delivered vaginally (group 3, n: 62).ResultsThe cumulative expulsion rates were similar with a frequency of 8.7, 8.9 and 11.3 % respectively in groups 1 to 3 (p > 0.05 in all pairwise comparisons). The rate of patients who had the IUD removed at 12th month was 4,3, 6.7 and 11.3 % for groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively (p > 0.05 in all pairwise comparisons). Multiparity increased the risk of cumulative expulsion within 12 months by 2.1 fold (95 % 1,03–4,37) in the logistic regression model. Previous vaginal deliveries or IUD use did not have an impact on the expulsion of the IUD. The risk of spontaneous expulsion was similar in patients whose IUD was placed after cesarean in the active and latent phase or after spontaneous vaginal delivery.ConclusionsThe rates of IUD expulsion are similar in patients who underwent cesarean section before and during labor and who delivered vaginally. Parity was the only factor independently associated with IUD expulsion.

The increase in the cesarean delivery rate is leading to an increase in the rate of abnormal placentation (placenta previa and accreta), which in turn give rise to an increase in the peripartum hysterectomy rate. Cesarean section itself is also a risk factor for emergency peripartum hysterectomy. Therefore, every effort should be made to reduce the cesarean rate by performing this procedure only for valid clinical indications. The risk factors for peripartum hysterectomy should be identified antenatally. The delivery and operation should be performed in appropriate clinical settings by experienced surgeons when risk factors are identified.

The aim of the study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy, findings and feasibility of office-based diagnostic hysteroscopy in an IVF population. A total of 2500 consecutive infertile patients were enrolled prospectively prior to IVF treatment. Diagnostic hysteroscopy was performed on each subject in an office setting in the study IVF centre. A total of 1927 patients (77.1%) had a normal uterine cavity, while the remainder of the sample (n=573) demonstrated endometrial pathology on hysteroscopy (22.9%). Of the patients with endometrial pathology, 192 patients had endometrial polyps (7.68%), 96 patients had submucosal fibroids (3.84%), 31 patients had polypoid endometria (1.24%), 27 patients had intrauterine adhesions (1.08%) and 73 patients had uterine septa (2.92%). Diagnostic office-based hysteroscopy is routinely performed in the IVF clinic to assess the endometrial cavity. In such an unselected population, a significant percentage of patients had evidence of uterine pathology that may have impaired the success of IVF. Safety, ease of use, high diagnostic accuracy and high patient tolerance makes office-based hysteroscopy an ideal procedure.

Based on the above findings, we hypothesize that higher levels of acetaldehyde and possibly other glucose degradation products may have been an aetiological factor in these 21 cases of chemical peritonitis. Our observation suggests that acetaldehyde, in concentrations 3-4 times higher than the usual level in commercially available PD solutions, may induce acute sterile peritonitis in CAPD patients.

No abstract