The clinical use of mirror visual feedback (MVF) was initially introduced to alleviate phantom pain, and has since been applied to the improvement of hemiparesis following stroke. However, it is not known whether MVF can restore motor function by producing plastic changes in the human primary motor cortex (M1). Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation to test whether M1 plasticity is a physiological substrate of MVF-induced motor behavioral improvement. MVF intervention in normal volunteers using a mirror box improved motor behavior and enhanced excitatory functions of the M1. Moreover, behavioral and physiological measures of MVFinduced changes were positively correlated with each other. Improved motor performance occurred after observation of a simple action, but not after repetitive motor training of the nontarget hand without MVF, suggesting the crucial importance of visual feedback. The beneficial effects of MVF were disrupted by continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over the M1, but not the control site in the occipital cortex. However, MVF following cTBS could further improve the motor functions. Our findings indicate that M1 plasticity, especially in its excitatory connections, is an essential component of MVF-based therapies.

No abstract

Repeated paired associative stimulation combining peripheral nerve stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) can produce human motor plasticity. However, previous studies used paired artificial stimuli, so that it is not known whether repetitive natural M1 activity associated with TMS can induce plasticity or not. To test this hypothesis, we developed a movement-related cortical stimulation (MRCS) protocol, in which the left M1 was stimulated by TMS at specific timing with respect to the mean expected reaction time (RT) of voluntary movement during a simple reaction time task using the right abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle. Seventeen normal volunteers were subjected to repeated MRCS intervention (0.2 Hz, 240 pairs). Motor function was assessed before and after MRCS. When TMS was given 50 ms before the RT of movement [MRCS(Ϫ50)], motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude of the right APB, but not other muscles, increased for up to 15 min post-MRCS. The RT of the right APB was also shortened. However, spinal excitability measured by F-wave did not change. When TMS was given 100 ms after the RT [MRCS(ϩ100)], MEP amplitude was decreased. These findings show that this new MRCS protocol can produce timing-dependent motor associative plasticity, which may be clinically useful.

No abstract

No abstract