Atherosclerosis is a chronic and progressive inflammatory process beginning early in life with late clinical manifestation. This slow pathological trend underlines the importance to early identify high-risk patients and to treat intensively risk factors to prevent the onset and/or the progression of atherosclerotic lesions. In addition to the common Cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, new markers able to increase the risk of CV disease have been identified. Among them, high levels of Lipoprotein(a)—Lp(a)—lead to very high risk of future CV diseases; this relationship has been well demonstrated in epidemiological, mendelian randomization and genome-wide association studies as well as in meta-analyses. Recently, new aspects have been identified, such as its association with aortic stenosis. Although till recent years it has been considered an unmodifiable risk factor, specific drugs have been developed with a strong efficacy in reducing the circulating levels of Lp(a) and their capacity to reduce subsequent CV events is under testing in ongoing trials. In this paper we will review all these aspects: from the synthesis, clearance and measurement of Lp(a), through the findings that examine its association with CV diseases and aortic stenosis to the new therapeutic options that will be available in the next years.

Objective:The role of resting Heart Rate on the progression of arterial stiffness has not yet been extensively evaluated. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between resting HR and baseline arterial stiffness (evaluated by cfPWV) as well as its progression in a population of hypertensive patients over a 3.7 years follow-up period.Design and method:We enrolled 572 hypertensive outpatients 18–80 aged, followed by the Hypertension Unit of St. Gerardo Hospital (Monza, Italy). Anamnestic, clinical and laboratory data, BP and cfPWV (complior) were assessed at baseline and after a median follow-up time of 3.7 ± 0.5 yearsResults:At baseline the mean age was 53.9 ± 12.7 years, SBP and DBP were 141.2 ± 17.8 and 86.5 ± 10.5 mmHg, HR was 65.6 ± 10.9 bpm and PWV was 8.6 ± 2.0 m/s. Despite an improvement in BP values (from 141.2/86.5 to 132.6/79.2 mmHg, p < 0.001), during follow-up, PWV increased (PWV 0.5 ± 2.2 m/s). In patients with a HR above as compared to those under the median value (9 bpm), PWV was significantly higher (0.82 ± 2.22 vs. 0.27 ± 2.25 m/s, p = 0.003). At multivariate analysis, HR was among the significant determinants of both baseline PWV and its progression ( = 0.031, p < 0.001). Furthermore, HR was a significant determinant of deltaPWV ( = 0.019; p = 0.017).Conclusions:In hypertensive patients there is a significant relationship between basal resting HR and basal PWV as well as between the increase of HR and the increase of PWV during the follow-up period. Beyond age and BP, resting HR must be considered as an independent determinant of arterial stiffness. This represents a possible mechanism through which HR contributes to the increase in CV risk.

Objective:SARS-CoV-2 determines a framework of multi-organ dysfunction that can involve the cardiovascular system creating damages of different nature. Among these, endothelial damage could play a key role in increasing arterial stiffness and thus the cardiovascular risk of infected patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) of a population of patients after recovery from infection and to compare them with those of a group affected by arterial hypertension.Design and method:This prospective observational monocentric study involved 143 patients with previous diagnosis of Covid-19 who undergone PWV measurement during the follow-up at a median time of 3.8 months after the infection. These patients were compared to a population of 143 patients with hypertension matched by age, sex, Systolic Blood Pressure values and Body Mass Index.Results:PWV values were higher in Covid-19 group comparing to hypertension group (10.5 ± 3.0 m/s VS 8.9 ± 2.5 m/s). Furthermore, there is a correlation between higher PWV values and lower values of SpO2% at time of admission at the Emergency Department. (R = -0.302; p < 0.001).Conclusions:SARS-CoV-2 infection seems related to increased PWV values. Moreover, higher arterial stiffness seems correlated to a worse oxygen saturation in Emergency Department. More studies with longer follow-up time are necessary to establish whether the vascular damage is reversible and whether it correlates with an increase of long-term cardiovascular risk.

Background Among the different CardioVascular (CV) manifestation of the COronaVIrus-related Disease (COVID) particular attention has been paid to arrhythmia and particularly to Atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of our study was to assess the incidence of AF episodes in patients hospitalized for COVID and to evaluate its predictors and its relationship with in-hospital all-cause mortality. Methods We enrolled 3435 cases of SARS-CoV2 infection admitted in four hospitals in Northern Italy. We collected data on clinical history, vital signs, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, laboratory tests and pharmacological treatment. AF incident and all-cause in-hospital mortality were considered as outcomes. Results 145 (4.2%) patients develop AF during hospitalization, with a median time of 3 days (IQR: 0, 11.5) from admission. Incident AF patients were older and had lower eGFR, lower platelet and lymphocytes count and higher C-Reactive Protein (CRP), were admitted more frequently to ICU and more frequently died compared to subjects that didn't present AF. At the Cox regression model significant determinants of incident AF were older age (HR 1.070; 95% CI: 1.048, 1.092), history of AF (HR 2.800; 95% CI: 1.465, 5.351), ischemic heart disease (HR 0.324; 95% CI: 0.130, 0.811) and ICU admission (HR 8.030; 95% CI: 4.511, 14.292). Incident AF was a predictor of all-cause mortality (HR 1.679; 95% CI: 1.170, 2.410), together with age (HR 1.053; 95% CI: 1.042, 1.065), dementia (HR 1.553; 95% CI 1.151, 2.095), platelet count (HR 0.997; 95% CI: 0.996, 0.999) higher CRP (HR 1.004; 95% CI: 1.003, 1.005) and eGFR (HR: 0.991; 95% CI: 0.986, 0.996) Conclusion AF present as the main arrhythmia in COVID-19 patients and its development during the hospitalization strongly relates with in-hospital mortality.