An 83-year-old woman with a 1-year history of scheduled intravitreal injection of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor (aflibercept) was diagnosed with nephrotic syndrome due to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis with histopathological findings of segmental infiltration of foam cells in the glomerular capillaries. Her nephrotic syndrome improved immediately following the termination of aflibercept intravitreal injection without steroid therapy. Although widely used to treat ophthalmic diseases, we should keep in mind that even intravitreal injection of VEGF inhibitor, as opposed to systemic administration, can cause kidney injury.
Background Tumor-to-tumor metastasis is the rare phenomenon in which one tumor exhibits metastatic deposits from another. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no prior reported case of tumor-to-tumor metastasis of a diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) to a primary gastric adenocarcinoma. Case presentation A 70-year-old man presented with chest discomfort. An echocardiogram showed the presence of a right ventricular tumor. A positron emission tomogram showed multiple foci of abnormal activity in right cervical lymph nodes, cardiac wall, and stomach. A right cervical lymph node biopsy specimen revealed histological features of DLBCL. An esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed a large circumferential ulceration on the gastric body. Subsequent biopsy revealed adenocarcinoma cells surrounded by infiltrating lymphoma cells. On immunohistochemical staining, lymphoma cells were positive for CXCR4 and adenocarcinoma cells were positive for CXCL12/SDF-1. The patient was treated with six cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy regimen, resulting in a complete remission. Conclusions This patient’s case implies that the interaction between a chemokine and its receptor may be the underlying mechanism for the observed tumor-to-tumor metastasis. Specifically, our case would suggest an involvement of the CXCL12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 axis in the observed metastasis of DLBCL to primary gastric adenocarcinoma.
Malignant hypertension triggers incremental renin activity, whereas primary aldosteronism suppresses such activity. We encountered a patient with malignant hypertension refractory to multiple anti-hypertensive agents. Repeated neurohormonal assessments, instead of a single one, eventually uncovered trends in an incremental aldosterone concentration, ranging from 221 up to 468 pg/mL, with a decline in the renin activity from 2.3 to <0.2 ng/mL/h. Adrenal venous sampling confirmed bilateral aldosterone secretion. Following the diagnosis of bilateral primary aldosteronism, we initiated a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, which improved his blood pressure. Repeated neurohormonal assessments are encouraged to correctly diagnose underlying primary aldosteronism with malignant hypertension.
Background Cholesterol embolization syndrome (CES) is a disease associating with the systemic cholesterol crystal embolism and end-organ dysfunction due to the atherosclerotic plaque rupture, which is dominantly triggered by the intravascular intervention. There is no consensus for which types of anticoagulants we should use during the hemodialysis in patients with CES and end-stage renal disease. Case presentation We had a 68-year-old man with CES due to intravascular intervention, who suffered the omental bleeding, instead of the embolism, immediately after the initiation of hemodialysis with heparinization. An emergent laparotomy found active bleeding from the omentum, which was surgically repaired. The histopathological analysis showed the embolization of cholesterol crystal clefts in the omentum artery and the injury of arterial wall structure accompanied by the infiltration of inflammatory cells. We preferred nafamostat mesylate during hemodialysis and he had no adverse events following the surgery. Conclusions It should be noticed that, in addition to the embolic events, bleeding events can develop in patients with CES, particularly following the initiation of hemodialysis with anticoagulation therapy.
Background:Primary aldosteronism is associated with low plasma renin levels, while malignant phase hypertension is generally associated with raised renin activity. Therefore, these two conditions are at opposite ends of the renin spectrum, so in theory their co-existence would be unusual.Case presentation:We present a case of a 41-year-old male with uncontrolled hypertension on multiple antihypertensive drugs. He discontinued these drugs for three days, thereafter he admitted to our hospital with congestive heart failure and acute ischemic stroke. He manifested malignant phase hypertension (blood pressure 216/130 mmHg; Keith-Wagener IV) accompanying renal dysfunction (serum creatinine 2.4 mg/dL), high plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC, 221 pg/mL) and mildly elevated plasma renin activity (PRA, 3.0 ng/mL/hr). A computed tomography did not reveal the presence of adrenal mass. After the treatment for congestive heart failure, the reassessment for endocrine causes of hypertension showed high level of PAC (468 pg/mL) and low level of PRA (0.2 ng/mL/hr), resulting in a high PAC/PRA ratio under the treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) confirmed the excessive aldosterone secretion from bilateral adrenal glands. Given these findings, we diagnosed him with idiopathic aldosteronism. After an addition of the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, he could keep his blood pressure under control.Conclusions:PRA in patients with primary aldosteronism could be increased under the conditions in which renin release from the kidney is overstimulated by glomerular ischemia, leading to an incorrect diagnosis of primary aldosteronism. Repeated endocrine assessment including the measurement of PRA and PAC should be considered to reveal the cause of malignant phase hypertension.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.